So the SEC is bearing its teeth so far at 5-1

karlchilders.sixpack

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2008
19,962
3,968
113
With Auburn, Mizzou, Vandy, and Bama left to go.

I'm thinking that we win at least two of those, 7- 3 would be a very good year.

I've seen quite a bit of testiness from other teams, especially Big10 teams. They don't like it.

Just a few observations,

what do you think?
 

croomin

Redshirt
Oct 6, 2012
532
0
0
All I know is I am comfortable with the SEC Nat'l Title run ending...

To hell with Auburn. May Florida State rip them apart. Aside from that, glad to see the Conference coming out on top.

But all of the games have been pretty competitive, except ours of course.

Also love seeing the B1G lose, but I do like this Michigan State team.
 
Last edited:

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,850
26,252
113
I think you're right. Bama should win pretty easily, Vandy a slight favorite, Mizzou a tossup, and Auburn a slight underdog. Also, in almost every bowl the SEC is playing a team that finished higher in its conference than the SEC team did. Big 10 is a pretty decent major conference, but not nearly as good as the SEC/PAC-12/Big 12 overall. If they don't like it, they just need to get better. But population demographics are working against them. When Notre Dame went to the ACC, they were thinking long-term.
 

was21

Senior
May 29, 2007
9,937
584
113
For some strange reason, I've always wanted to play a mid level Big Ten team on a home and away basis...Purdue comes to mind...there may be others..Indiana maybe
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Exactly.

No tie-ins for the SEC are apples to apples right now. Nor will they likely be in the future. It's always a #5 SEC vs a #3 ACC/B1G or something like that.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,850
26,252
113
If the SEC "encourages" every school to play at least 1 major conference opponent each year, we should definitely be looking at the mid to lower Big 10 and ACC teams.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
18,994
2,084
113
Could have a home and home with Ohio State. Mullen and Meyer have something in common so it could probably be done .... And Mullen is 1-0 vs Meyer.

At least that would make people here quit complaining about scheduling Oklahoma State.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
18,994
2,084
113
Actually, that IS apples to apples. 5 in the SEC is at least equivalent to 3 in the ACC and B1G. That's why it's set up that way.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Actually, that IS apples to apples. 5 in the SEC is at least equivalent to 3 in the ACC and B1G. That's why it's set up that way.

It's still unfair no matter what percentage of the time we beat them.
 

missouridawg

Junior
Oct 6, 2009
9,389
288
83
Could have a home and home with Ohio State. Mullen and Meyer have something in common so it could probably be done .... And Mullen is 1-0 vs Meyer.

At least that would make people here quit complaining about scheduling Oklahoma State.

Mullen lost to Urban/Tebow in Starkville in 2009. John Banks with 2 pick 6s.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Could have a home and home with Ohio State. Mullen and Meyer have something in common so it could probably be done .... And Mullen is 1-0 vs Meyer.

At least that would make people here quit complaining about scheduling Oklahoma State.

1-1. I'm not even convinced that they would be willing to do a straight up home and home with us if we for some reason totally lost our minds and decided we wanted that.

I don't care anything about home and homes with meandering B1G schools. Play them in bowls. Is everyone in favor of that willing to give up a 7th home game in the 3rd year in order to say they visited Purdue? It doesn't make much fiscal sense for MSU at this point to start scheduling a home and home in the place of what is currently a 2-for-1.