Since you're family is from Ft. Worth
I would think you would understand better than most just how wrong your example is. I used the historical perspective to highlight that Ft. Worth is not a suburb of Dallas. I live in Fort Worth and the vast majority of people that I work with live in Fort Worth or one of its many suburbs. There are several major companies located in Fort Worth that employee several thousand employees each. I have lived here for 13 years now and I can count on one hand the number of people that I know that have ever commuted to Dallas at any point in their career. Your example sucks because places like Madison, Pearl, Flowood, etc. exist as they do because of Jackson. If Jackson wasn't there, they would all be sleepy little Mississippi towns because there wouldn't be a population base to drive their growth. Fort Worth became what it is independent of Dallas and is anything but a little brother to Dallas. And no one that is from Fort Worth that I have ever met would even think of claiming Dallas when asked where they are from. As I said, it has only been in the last 30 years or so that the two have meshed due to the explosion of the suburbs located between the two of them. I understand your original point (even though it was weakly made), I was just pointing out the fallacy of your chosen example. As a long time resident of Fort Worth, it rendered your point basically meaningless since your entire premise was flawed by your example.
I guess it doesn't really matter that much, just bothered me for some reason....
I would think you would understand better than most just how wrong your example is. I used the historical perspective to highlight that Ft. Worth is not a suburb of Dallas. I live in Fort Worth and the vast majority of people that I work with live in Fort Worth or one of its many suburbs. There are several major companies located in Fort Worth that employee several thousand employees each. I have lived here for 13 years now and I can count on one hand the number of people that I know that have ever commuted to Dallas at any point in their career. Your example sucks because places like Madison, Pearl, Flowood, etc. exist as they do because of Jackson. If Jackson wasn't there, they would all be sleepy little Mississippi towns because there wouldn't be a population base to drive their growth. Fort Worth became what it is independent of Dallas and is anything but a little brother to Dallas. And no one that is from Fort Worth that I have ever met would even think of claiming Dallas when asked where they are from. As I said, it has only been in the last 30 years or so that the two have meshed due to the explosion of the suburbs located between the two of them. I understand your original point (even though it was weakly made), I was just pointing out the fallacy of your chosen example. As a long time resident of Fort Worth, it rendered your point basically meaningless since your entire premise was flawed by your example.
I guess it doesn't really matter that much, just bothered me for some reason....
It was a vague example of a big city next to a smaller city where people commute to and from, and there is some form of teamwork between the two. If you want to get all specific on dates that the two were founded you're reading way too far into what I said.
My entire family is from Fort Worth, and everyone works in Dallas but lives in FW for the amenities it provides. How is that any different than what I'm saying but on a bigger scale? It's not a suburb but it's a little brother to Dallas. To say otherwise is insane. Ask a person where they're from and they're always going to tell you 9/10 times Dallas.
Last edited: