I don’t know, but our QB wore #36 for a game about 15 years ago.When did the rules and the NCAA become so soft that they said screw it, not worth enforcing anything?
ie: wearing shorts, no pads, plus all the other BS they now allow.
But that was a one time only thing for a special tribute.I don’t know, but our QB wore #36 for a game about 15 years ago.
True, but to your question, there are no jersey number rules in college football besides ineligible receiver numbers…only recommendations.But that was a one time only thing for a special tribute.
Actually I don’t think the NCAA rules prohibit a quarterback from wearing any numberAs far as I know a Qb can wear any number from 0-49 and 80-99. OL are the only players with restricted numbers. No such thing as a LB number as D can wear any number they like.
Real question, why is soaking not against the CLS rules?When did the rules and the NCAA become so soft that they said screw it, not worth enforcing anything?
ie: wearing shorts, no pads, plus all the other BS they now allow.
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think offensive players other than lineman who aren't eligible to catch a pass unless identifying themselves as eligible can wear any number except 50-79.Actually I don’t think the NCAA rules prohibit a quarterback from wearing any number
0-99.
Interesting that you call someone soft in the same post where you ***** about football fashion.When did the rules and the NCAA become so soft that they said screw it, not worth enforcing anything?
ie: wearing shorts, no pads, plus all the other BS they now allow.
According to the NCAA Football Rules Book- (Rule 1-4-2): Player Numbers on page FR-24- The only numbers restricted by position are interior offensive linemen, who must wear 50–79 (Rule 1-4-2-c) as you pointed out. Players must wear jersey numbers in the range of 0-99, with no explicit position specific restrictions on quarterbacks, or surprisingly actual anyone else, other than interior offensive linemen.I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think offensive players other than lineman who aren't eligible to catch a pass unless identifying themselves as eligible can wear any number except 50-79.
Interesting that you think a number is fashion related.Interesting that you call someone soft in the same post where you ***** about football fashion.
Agree, especially with the shorts thang. A college ref told me that lack of a knee pad was actually against the rules. Somewhere in the player safety domain. I know I wouldn't even want to play without knee pads.....if you've ever knocked your knee with another player's, or a helmet or shoe going full speed, you know what I mean. The numbers thing is out of control as well. Wish we would go back to traditional numbering for a player's position. Tired of seeing DE's with a #1 or #9, etc. They're not a QB, RB, or WR. Cmon' man!When did the rules and the NCAA become so soft that they said screw it, not worth enforcing anything?
ie: wearing shorts, no pads, plus all the other BS they now allow.
He's Jewish also polygamy was stop being church doctrine in 1890.They wear a number for the amount of wives they want