SP+ projections for WVU/BIG 12

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Don Nehlen coached more seasons and had a higher winning % than old coke head Dana. 16 of the 35 men who have been head coach's for wvu had a Higher winning % than your messiah. Holgorsen was the patron saint of mediocrity at wvu.
Actual Wins are what matter, not manufactured stats to try to make you feel better.
 

Jason Voorhees

Redshirt
Jan 2, 2017
2,196
0
0
Buck, this try to raise a lather / rinse / repeat over Holgersen is getting a little old. He just got an extension at Houston, so I doubt he will ever return to coach WVU, so why should we care about him? Or Rich Rod. Or either Bowden offspring for that mater?

Let’s move on.
Holgorsen may be available in year 2 or 3 of Houston's big 12 stint. He has already proven he is nothing more than an average power 5 coach. Even last season he was 2-2 against the best 4 teams he played. Wvu and the rest of the big 12 except for maybe early season Kansas would have had 9 guaranteed wins playing Houston's schedule.
 

Jason Voorhees

Redshirt
Jan 2, 2017
2,196
0
0
It’s news that directly affects WVU. It will be used in rankings and tv placement during the next season. It will affect recruiting, donations, and eventually peoples jobs. What’s NOT news is you whining and trolling every time someone posts facts that don’t paint your bs in a good light.
all you have to do is just win just ask Baylor and Oklahoma State. Ask Texas and Iowa State How much preseason Hype matters when you lose
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
All I have to ask is Neal Brown how much WVU is winning since he arrived. Not much at all--worst coaching effort since the 1950's at WVU.

Here is SPORTS REFERENCE ranking of WVU coaches all time (21 coaches)

21 Coaches​


  • W-L-T record at West Virginia

RkCoachFromToYrsGWLTPctGWLTPctNotes
OverallBowls
OverallBowls
RkCoachFromToYrsGWLTPctGWLTPctNotes
1Don Nehlen1980200021246149934.61413490.308
2Dana Holgorsen20112018810261410.5987250.286
3Rich Rodriguez2001200778660260.6985230.400
4Art Lewis19501959109858382.6021010.000
5Rat Rogers1925194598344318.5780000
6Bobby Bowden1970197566842260.6182110.500
7Clarence Spears192119244383063.80811001.000
8Gene Corum1960196566129302.4921010.000
9Bill Stewart2007201044028120.7004220.500
10Jim Carlen1966196944125133.64611001.000
11Mont McIntire1916192043924114.6670000
12Bill Kern1940194754824231.5100000
13Neal Brown2019202133517180.4862110.500
14Frank Cignetti1976197944417270.3860000
15Trusty Tallman1934193632915122.5520000
16Marshall Glenn1937193932914123.53411001.000
17Dudley DeGroot194819492231391.58711001.000
18Greasy Neale1931193333112163.4350000
19Sol Metzger191419152161051.6560000
20C.A. Lueder1909190919432.5560000
21Edwin Sweetland1913191319342.4440000
 

Jason Voorhees

Redshirt
Jan 2, 2017
2,196
0
0
Actual Wins are what matter, not manufactured stats to try to make you feel better.
Winning percentage is a better indicator in most cases than actual wins. Holgorsen was only at wvu for 8 years because nobody wanted him. Big time programs don't like coach's that choke in November. He was lucky to have a friend in Houston that got him the job. He self-demoted because he knew the bottom was about to fall out.
 

Jason Voorhees

Redshirt
Jan 2, 2017
2,196
0
0
It’s news that directly affects WVU. It will be used in rankings and tv placement during the next season. It will affect recruiting, donations, and eventually peoples jobs. What’s NOT news is you whining and trolling every time someone posts facts that don’t paint your bs in a good light.
You don't know the difference between a news article and an opinion article.
 

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
Buck, this try to raise a lather / rinse / repeat over Holgersen is getting a little old. He just got an extension at Houston, so I doubt he will ever return to coach WVU, so why should we care about him? Or Rich Rod. Or either Bowden offspring for that mater?

Let’s move on.
The word would be matter...not mater.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
No one says- Nick Saban or anyone else had a great “ winning percentage”. Rather, they go down in the history books for ACTUAL WINS.

And actual wins are something that Neal Brown is not delivering to WVU at anywhere near the level of the previous staff or really anyone else going back to the 40’s Edit*. Outside the equally bad Frank Cignetti who coached a few Brown like seasons and was let go in the late 70’s.

Denying that the last staff brought significant success to the WVU football program while also facing the most difficult schedules is simply lying for lyings sake.
 
Last edited:

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Preseason rankings carry with teams throughout every season- sometimes through the end. SP+ is considered by those ranking teams in the pre season and throughout the season and will factor in to where you finish in the rankings.

if you are considered a scrub program as Neal Brown has made WVU, you wont be attractive to quality recruits or good players already at your school.

If you LOSE more than win, as Brown does, the fanbase will dwindle and so will donations and support to the program until change is made.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,558
734
113
Why will the new OC be a game changer? Who will be this game changing QB? Why will the no name running back by committee be better than Leddie?
No name running back by commitee? We have a pretty good RB in the program and 3 guys with experience
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,558
734
113
It’s news that directly affects WVU. It will be used in rankings and tv placement during the next season. It will affect recruiting, donations, and eventually peoples jobs. What’s NOT news is you whining and trolling every time someone posts facts that don’t paint your bs in a good light.
It has already killed our TV placement so bad we have 3 marquee weeknight games.
 

westsiderSJHS77

Redshirt
Aug 9, 2008
2,800
0
0
No one says- Nick Saban or anyone else had a great “ winning percentage”. Rather, they go down in the history books for ACTUAL WINS.

And actual wins are something that Neal Brown is not delivering to WVU at anywhere near the level of the previous staff or really anyone else going back to the 50s.
Frank Cignetti would like to thank you for over looking the late 70s.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Frank Cignetti would like to thank you for over looking the late 70s.
Good point--equally bad, maybe a little worse. Both have at least two five win only regular seasons back to back at WVU (Brown of course was gifted a bowl due to Covid cancelling sure losses). Both managed 17 wins for WVU--took Cignetti four seasons to get there, Brown 3, but Cignetti was coach no more after 4.

Brown is at #13 and Cignetti at #14 for ranked WVU coaches-so we'll amend that one other coach in the 70's was as bad as Neal Brown, but other than that you have to go back to actually BEFORE the 1950's into the 40's and way earlier to find such a lousy job performance.

 
Last edited:

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
It has already killed our TV placement so bad we have 3 marquee weeknight games.
Well, 3 weeknight games anyway. Don't know that any major program considers weeknight games "marquee". Besides those schedule changes were announced prior to the SP+ rankings, not after. The Big Ten refused to play any weeknight games for a number of years, and you'll rarely see top programs playing in those games. 3:30 and 7:30 Saturdays are the preferred slots.
 

WVUALLEN

Senior
Aug 4, 2009
67,805
692
113
Spears coached from 1921-1944 at WVU--comes in at #7, well ahead of Neal Brown in all time WVU coaching rankings.
Idiot. Doc Spears was only here until 1924.

Played those power house teams of WV Weslyan, Marietta, Gonzaga, Allegheny, Marshall, Saint Louis, Geneva, Centre College, Bethany...
 
Last edited:

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Talk about an idiot. A typo 1944 rather than 1924 and you guessed it the resident troll throws a hissy fit.

Spears still performed better in his four years than the horrid Brown and is ranked 7spots higher in all time rankings of WVU coaches.
 

WVUFanForever

Redshirt
Oct 1, 2004
13,368
20
0
Your historical coaches thread has ZERO respones....

Take that as a hint that people are tired of your Dana ********... okay...
 

westsiderSJHS77

Redshirt
Aug 9, 2008
2,800
0
0
Well, 3 weeknight games anyway. Don't know that any major program considers weeknight games "marquee". Besides those schedule changes were announced prior to the SP+ rankings, not after. The Big Ten refused to play any weeknight games for a number of years, and you'll rarely see top programs playing in those games. 3:30 and 7:30 Saturdays are the preferred slots.
NEWS FLASH

This just in: Ohio State is no longer considered a top program in college football. The Buckeyes dropped from the upper class in the sport due to playing their 2021 season opener on Thursday September 2, 2021. Thanks for setting everyone straight. I’m sure “king of nothing” will be here to straighten you out.

Clemson fans are feeling the same pain since they too played on a Friday night last year too.

That’s two programs that via for the playoffs every year. Major disappointment for both those schools.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Your historical coaches thread has ZERO respones....

Take that as a hint that people are tired of your Dana ********... okay...
Ahhh, but more than 100 people and growing have viewed it havent they.

Tells me two things: Some like me are interested in WVU historical facts. Others like you don’t want anyone realizing your LIES are just that— meaningless babbling from radical trolls trying to paint a false narrative about WVU football For an agenda.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
NEWS FLASH

This just in: Ohio State is no longer considered a top program in college football. The Buckeyes dropped from the upper class in the sport due to playing their 2021 season opener on Thursday September 2, 2021. Thanks for setting everyone straight. I’m sure “king of nothing” will be here to straighten you out.

Clemson fans are feeling the same pain since they too played on a Friday night last year too.

That’s two programs that via for the playoffs every year. Major disappointment for both those schools.
Hmm so you are saying if you EVER play on a weeknight then you aren’t a major program. Whereas I stated - and clearly at that a weeknight game isn’t necessarily a “ marquee” game per major programs And they rarely- notice I didn’t say “ never”, but “ rarely”-play them. Pretty sure you’ll find the Ohio State/ Clemson type midweek games are extremely rare, and when they are played are not their “ marquee” games- just games that were fit in a time slot. WVU is now having to play some of its top games weeknight. You wont see Ohio State/Clemson or such doing that.

Plus the point remains even though you don’t address that— This Change in WVUs schedule came about before the SP+ ratings.
 
Last edited:

westsiderSJHS77

Redshirt
Aug 9, 2008
2,800
0
0
Why should anyone care about a poll that ranks teams 7 months before the season begins? With several more schools loosing or gaining players who leave after spring practice and during the summer, who knows how a team’s roster will look like. Let alone how a billionaire may just open his wallet and buy a couple dozen players and change a school’s roster in a weeks time.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Why should anyone care about a poll that ranks teams 7 months before the season begins? With several more schools loosing or gaining players who leave after spring practice and during the summer, who knows how a team’s roster will look like. Let alone how a billionaire may just open his wallet and buy a couple dozen players and change a school’s roster in a weeks time.
The people that MADE the poll obviously believe it matters, as do those ranking schools all throughout the season. I'm sure the various gambling operations care. Undoubtedly players considering programs also do. Ask them why it matters
 

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
Why should anyone care about a poll that ranks teams 7 months before the season begins? With several more schools loosing or gaining players who leave after spring practice and during the summer, who knows how a team’s roster will look like. Let alone how a billionaire may just open his wallet and buy a couple dozen players and change a school’s roster in a weeks time.
The word is...losing...not loosing lol.
 

GhostofGraves

Redshirt
Mar 6, 2010
1,370
0
0
Neal Brown hasn't won a bowl game with a team "he recruited".

WVU 70 Clemson 33. Dana Holgorsen won as many bowl games as every coach EVER at WVU except Don Nehlen. And he won more than Brown has. And his wins weren't eked out against a G5 squad.

Brown can barely get WVU into a bowl, whereas Dana Holgorsen had WVU 4 pts from a BIG 12 CCG and likely major bowl berth.

But like I said, some people want to sell that 5 wins is better than 7,8,10 win seasons. Don't think even they actually believe that, but can't admit how wrong they've been so keep trying to sell that bunk.
WVU 70 Clemson 33...with a team Holgs didn't recruit.
 

spartansstink

Redshirt
Sep 24, 2005
3,374
0
0
Ahhh, but more than 100 people and growing have viewed it havent they.

Tells me two things: Some like me are interested in WVU historical facts. Others like you don’t want anyone realizing your LIES are just that— meaningless babbling from radical trolls trying to paint a false narrative about WVU football For an agenda.
Your logic is faulty.

You SHOULD really be complaining about the firing/loss of Bill Stewart, which according to your own stats and your criteria should have never been fired being the best coach WVU has really ever had - using win-loss records. Thus, Dana should never have been here.

I've yet to see you, using the criteria you hold most dear, to defend Bill. With you, its only Dana this and Dana that. If you're going to be consistent in your arguments, you need to jump off the Dana bandwagon and get on board the Bill train and educate this board about how Dana should have never have been here in the first place.
 

WVUFanForever

Redshirt
Oct 1, 2004
13,368
20
0
meaningless babbling from radical trolls trying to paint a false narrative about WVU football For an agenda.
You are talking about yourself right there...correct? What ******* false narrative is this board putting out there douchebag?

I will wait? Just because we dont all slurp the cokehead like you, that isn't a false narrative.
 

WVUFanForever

Redshirt
Oct 1, 2004
13,368
20
0
The people that MADE the poll obviously believe it matters, as do those ranking schools all throughout the season. I'm sure the various gambling operations care. Undoubtedly players considering programs also do. Ask them why it matters
I am making my own poll and putting WVU first.

See how easy that.
 

Buckaineer

Freshman
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Its amazing how the clown trolls here try to derail every post because their egos don't like when facts counter their nonsense.

WVU football is in deep trouble. So is basketball for that matter. Actual fans want those situations improved. Trolls want to derail threads where WVU fans discuss anything except the trolls. Just sad.