The Lumumba era is coming to a close

thatsbaseball

Well-known member
May 29, 2007
17,183
5,266
113
To make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
To make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
That part ain't rocket science. Work with the state and the CCID to make it safe, then the investment will happen. Jackson's downtown is ripe for it.

I'm just skeptical that even Bennie and his gang want TOO much investment. Because if too many people move in, their political power may be diminished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatsbaseball
Apr 20, 2014
71
46
18
Thank the good Lord that's over with. Too bad he ran off a MASSIVE chunk of the tax base in the process only never to return. I don't know why anyone who left would go back at this point, it's just chaos around there. Hope they can get things ironed out sooner rather than later because the rest of the states benefit when Jackson is in a good spot.
 

civildawg88

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
2,431
694
102
I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,384
17,291
113
I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
This the architectural drawing of the $500,000 "amphitheater" Chockwe is building at the zoo. I'm sure it'll come in at twice that.
1745432579259.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
14,476
4,432
113
The State and Feds can start to make differences now in Jackson. City alone does not have a pot to pee in outside of NE Jackson.
Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.

My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Villagedawg

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,177
3,549
113
Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.

My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.
Even for people who aren’t self interested, it’s not exactly hypocrisy to think that you should have local control and also, when that results in third world conditions, it’s better for state or federal entities to take control than it is to leave those people to suffer.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.

My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
You forgot to throw in how everybody wants 'regulation' in college sports too, all of the sudden. So weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

Lucifer Morningstar

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2022
1,662
2,575
113
As someone that spends most of their time in the metro area, this election is a good thing. Lumumba was a huge piece of ****, as others have stated in their own ways. Jackson can come back. It will not be easy, but nothing worth having ever is, right? And I know I will get the joke of the Devil living in Jackson from the folks that hate the city. And for those that have bad experiences in Jackson, there is nothing to say. For those, like me, that want to see the city come back. The first step is to make it safe. Once this happens, you can get real investment. And no, it will not be easy, but just giving up is not the answer
 
Last edited:

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
14,476
4,432
113
Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.
Even for people who aren’t self interested, it’s not exactly hypocrisy to think that you should have local control and also, when that results in third world conditions, it’s better for state or federal entities to take control than it is to leave those people to suffer.
It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.


 
Apr 7, 2025
315
243
43
Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.

My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
I mean i don't love a lot of federal dollars, but if everyone else is taking it?

Also, the reason jackson is in this mess is b/c its been so poorly ran, and i'm sure i don't have to remind you which "group" did that.
 
Apr 7, 2025
315
243
43
It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.


you can tell that lie on another website. You always crawfish when called out on your stupid comments.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
13,347
7,194
113
This the architectural drawing of the $500,000 "amphitheater" Chockwe is building at the zoo. I'm sure it'll come in at twice that.
View attachment 793070

Pat he's not building any amphitheater out there. Now that he's been given his release papers he will be grabbing every cent from every account available, that theater was just a last minute desperation plea for support so it may look like he was doing something to grab some votes. Now he may very well try to start something quickly there but it will only be to open the bank accounts for raiding. How long have they been talking about building a hotel at the convention center? Same ploy, hire somebody to do another "study" get money approved then skim off the top. Farish St, another ploy but they did pour some sidewalks and plant some trees and shrubs that got stolen before they had a chance to die.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.
Even for people who aren’t self interested, it’s not exactly hypocrisy to think that you should have local control and also, when that results in third world conditions, it’s better for state or federal entities to take control than it is to leave those people to suffer.
Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?

And let's face it, when the state comes in, they are protecting their own interests. They aren't worried about the average citizens of Jackson, and neither are you.

Federal grants are already available, for a number of things. They aren't the city savior either. They aren't going to come in and 'run' the city, it's for specific things, which come with strings attached. Which are good....but they still don't run the place.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
51,384
17,291
113
Pat he's not building any amphitheater out there. Now that he's been given his release papers he will be grabbing every cent from every account available, that theater was just a last minute desperation plea for support so it may look like he was doing something to grab some votes. Now he may very well try to start something quickly there but it will only be to open the bank accounts for raiding. How long have they been talking about building a hotel at the convention center? Same ploy, hire somebody to do another "study" get money approved then skim off the top. Farish St, another ploy but they did pour some sidewalks and plant some trees and shrubs that got stolen before they had a chance to die.
There's no question this thing is just a front for him to embezzle more money and get more kickbacks. What I think is funny is that even the architectural drawing looks cheap, and I'm sure if anything ever is built, it'll look a lot worse than that does. More likely, as you say, he bleeds all he can out of it and the project never actually gets built.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
13,347
7,194
113
The first step is to make it safe. Once this happens you can get real investment.
They are going to have to get rid of a lot of people in Jackson before the ones that are tax paying law abiding citizens will return. Trying to get the ones that don't contribute and cause the issues is next to impossible because they don't have the will or means to leave. I did over 20 years in the metro and watched it predictably get worse and worse each passing year, hell I did those 20 years in the suburbs and watched them even go down because of Jackson, no way I'm going back to start over with Jackson but I do sincerely hope it does come back.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
To be fair, there's still a final vote. Kenny Gee won the Republican vote for mayor with 99 total votes. June 3 is the final vote.

If Republicans convinced 100% of their constituents to come out and vote, and the Democrats added zero from the primaries, it would still be a landslide. With that level of control, I'd hope Bennie and Horhn would be willing to cross the aisle, sit down with TateR, and figure out how they could make Jackson a better place for all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
1,138
766
113
It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.


You forgot. It's only wasteful federal spending when it's done in the interest of others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

Predestined

Member
Dec 5, 2008
2,358
67
48
To make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
RATS

I thought you said Lemonis
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
2,503
4,009
113
Is he a decent guy? I assumed he was just another grifter based on Bennie Thompson's endorsement. Literally know nothing else about him, but assumed whoever was not under indictment and was not endorsed by Bennie would have been the most decent candidate.

He's a career politician, so let me be clear that I'm using the 'political scale' when I rate him. But on that scale, yeah, I'd say he's a good guy. Very friendly toward people on both sides and willing to listen to good ideas from either side. But he can also be firm in decisions and make a tough call if he has to. He and I don't agree on everything politically, obviously (because he's wrong on several things**) but I like him personally.

And what's more important than liking him is that he (a) has good intentions for the city, which I believe/hope he does; and (b) is smart or politically savvy enough to listen to those good ideas and implement them, even if some loudmouth constituents in parts of the city don't like it. Hopefully he will ignore some of the people who have been poison to the city in the past. (And don't just bring in a new crop of poisoners *cough cough* Bennie).

I don't know if it is, but if the best thing for the city is to move the zoo - move it.
If the best thing for the city is to hire more cops - hire them.
If the best thing for the city is to accept help from the state - let them help.
If the best thing on a city construction project would be to hire a licensed and bonded non-minority-owned contractor because they can do the best job and they can do it for less than some bloated local contractor who is paying your cousin a kickback just to get them in the door - F*CKING DO IT.
Don't let your own business interests get in the way of making good decisions for the city.

It's not that complicated. Just get back to business and keep us out of the political toilet.
 
Apr 7, 2025
315
243
43
Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?

And let's face it, when the state comes in, they are protecting their own interests. They aren't worried about the average citizens of Jackson, and neither are you.

Federal grants are already available, for a number of things. They aren't the city savior either. They aren't going to come in and 'run' the city, it's for specific things, which come with strings attached. Which are good....but they still don't run the place.
Are you worried about the average citizen in Jackson? 17 no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WilCoDawg

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,177
3,549
113
Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?
I don't know if I'm always talking about cutting waste, but certainly I support cutting waste. I don't think the state or feds controlling the water system is going to be super efficient or anything by normal standards, but compared to the city spending money and not having a functioning water/sewer system, I do think the state or feds can clear that bar easily and be a big improvement.

And let's face it, when the state comes in, they are protecting their own interests. They aren't worried about the average citizens of Jackson, and neither are you.

That's why I said self-interested and not charitable. I mean, I certainly do want residents of jackson to have clean running water just like I want anybody to have running water, but also certainly, if it wasn't the state capital and important for Mississippi to generally retain first world status, my appetite for spending federal and state money on it would be less. ETA: I also certainly would understand people from other states taking the position that Jackson voted itself into this mess and now they are getting what they voted for, good and hard and if somebody is going to bail them out it needs to be other Mississippians and not the feds.

Federal grants are already available, for a number of things. They aren't the city savior either. They aren't going to come in and 'run' the city, it's for specific things, which come with strings attached. Which are good....but they still don't run the place.
The specific things and strings attached are the savior with respect to attaining and keeping first world status. Running a water and sewer system is not rocket science. There are communities with relatively little human capital that manage to do it. Same with having paved roads and being reasonably safe within the CID. Jackson is presumably going to continue to be a 17ing basketcase of a city in general, but if there is enough state and federal control to have running water and sewer, paved streets, reasonably functioning law enforcement and justice system within the CID, there is enough there from state and federal offices plus being a population center in general that it can, if not become a thriving city, at least become the type of place that people don't want an explanation as to why you live there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,177
3,549
113
It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.


Again, I just don't know what that's going to be relevant to. Welcoming fed involvment is a combination of the very low standards that need to be met here (appoint a conservator so that clean running water is available in a city in the USA; something even the most skeptical libertarian I expect believes is within the capabilities of the feds) and self interest - every dollar the feds put in is probably $0.80-.90 the state doesn't have to put in.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
I don't know if I'm always talking about cutting waste, but certainly I support cutting waste. I don't think the state or feds controlling the water system is going to be super efficient or anything by normal standards, but compared to the city spending money and not having a functioning water/sewer system, I do think the state or feds can clear that bar easily and be a big improvement.

That's why I said self-interested and not charitable. I mean, I certainly do want residents of jackson to have clean running water just like I want anybody to have running water, but also certainly, if it wasn't the state capital and important for Mississippi to generally retain first world status, my appetite for spending federal and state money on it would be less. ETA: I also certainly would understand people from other states taking the position that Jackson voted itself into this mess and now they are getting what they voted for, good and hard and if somebody is going to bail them out it needs to be other Mississippians and not the feds.

The specific things and strings attached are the savior with respect to attaining and keeping first world status. Running a water and sewer system is not rocket science. There are communities with relatively little human capital that manage to do it. Same with having paved roads and being reasonably safe within the CID. Jackson is presumably going to continue to be a 17ing basketcase of a city in general, but if there is enough state and federal control to have running water and sewer, paved streets, reasonably functioning law enforcement and justice system within the CID, there is enough there from state and federal offices plus being a population center in general that it can, if not become a thriving city, at least become the type of place that people don't want an explanation as to why you live there.
I understand what you mean, but you have to admit it's inconsistent. State and feds can't just prop up a city forever anyway. Maybe we get some help, but it's ultimately the goal of government to create an environment where private investment can safely do its thing. If the local government can't ultimately get their heads out of their assses, the people who are left will simply continue to move away.

And lets be honest, the only area of Jackson that has a prayer is the CCID, which is lucky to be state-run due to its situation with all the state-owned land. But the mayor still has to meet them in the middle. Things like moving any decent attraction (like the zoo) to the CCID, are no-brainers. And any outside investments really need to be pointed to that area, unless the investor chooses otherwise. There should be no political barriers to downtown development.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
14,476
4,432
113
Again, I just don't know what that's going to be relevant to. Welcoming fed involvment is a combination of the very low standards that need to be met here (appoint a conservator so that clean running water is available in a city in the USA; something even the most skeptical libertarian I expect believes is within the capabilities of the feds) and self interest - every dollar the feds put in is probably $0.80-.90 the state doesn't have to put in.
I agree, its a good idea potentially involve them in whatever capacity will be beneficial.
They are wanted when it is viewed as beneficial, makes sense. Hopefully this will lead to fewer people engaging in the dramatics and theatrics that are on such frequent display when they are not wanted.
People launching generalized claims of how the federal government is all corrupt, incompetent, etc and then supporting using them when it is beneficial, is a tough circle to square.

To be clear, my subsequent comments are not directed at onewoof specifically.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,490
2,900
113
I actually do hope that Horhn can make some positive changes, but I don't expect much. There are too many problems, not enough tax base and very little community support. In stating that Jackson is very dangerous, lacks at least 200 officers, is impoverished as most who could move did, has extreme infrastructure issues and has a culture of those who lead wanting moreso to enrich themselves than solve problems, the degradation is entrenched. Yes, the Lumumba team has taken Jackson to the edge. Under the son's leadership, nothing positive occurred and he used his time to give out crony contracts for the purpose of kickbacks. I doubt much changes. Jackson, the hellhole it is, is officially dead.
Shocking take here, folks!!!****
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Darryl Steight
Apr 20, 2014
71
46
18
I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
The bulk of people who aren't delusional, and the ones that pay taxes overwhelmingly agree that the zoo should close.

It SHOULD have been moved to Lefleur's Bluff, but that was too racist we were told. It would have flourished at Lefleur's Bluff.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,772
9,125
113
Yet not one thing I said is incorrect
Hard to prove you wrong, for sure. Not only do you have to convince the existing Jacksonians to get on board, you also have to convince all the scared suburbanites and small towners that you can safely walk 3 feet inside the city limits and not be simultaneously stabbed and shot from 5 different directions. While I'm overembellishing the danger I am certainly not embellishing what Bubba from Pelahatchie and Christy Joe from Madison thinks. And the fear just magnifies the farther and farther away you get. I mean you have people like L4 who truly think it's Afghanistan.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,177
3,549
113
I understand what you mean, but you have to admit it's inconsistent. State and feds can't just prop up a city forever anyway. Maybe we get some help, but it's ultimately the goal of government to create an environment where private investment can safely do its thing. If the local government can't ultimately get their heads out of their assses, the people who are left will simply continue to move away.

And lets be honest, the only area of Jackson that has a prayer is the CCID, which is lucky to be state-run due to its situation with all the state-owned land. But the mayor still has to meet them in the middle. Things like moving any decent attraction (like the zoo) to the CCID, are no-brainers. And any outside investments really need to be pointed to that area, unless the investor chooses otherwise. There should be no political barriers to downtown development.
Local government is not going to get their heads out of their asses anytime soon because that's not what voters want, or at least not what they vote for.

You are correct that the only area with a prayer for the foreseeable future is the CCID, but I suspect the best you can hope for is that the city government doesn't actively try to impede it. It is a depressingly common objection to investment in depressed areas that essentially there is no kickback to people in the area. It's not enough that private investors are going to come in and put money in and make the area nicer. There will be opposition that essentially complains that they will not make any money directly off a project involving land they don't own, work they are not doing, and money they are not investing. They essentially feel cheated because they don't get anything out of it but the area near where they live becoming nicer, just because they have zero involvement in the project.

If Jackson starts seeing significant development in the CID, and the CID starts to actually be nicer, I feel like there is little doubt that you'd start to hear people in Jackson complain that all the investment is going into the CID and that they aren't benefitting from it. And their politicians will probably listen and try to impede more development, and if Horhn won't do it, he will probably be at risk of getting beat for re-election by somebody that will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight