To make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
That part ain't rocket science. Work with the state and the CCID to make it safe, then the investment will happen. Jackson's downtown is ripe for it.To make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
Big question is, will he be willing to move the zoo to LaFleur's Bluff?
That is 90 percent of Jackson's "issues."I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
This the architectural drawing of the $500,000 "amphitheater" Chockwe is building at the zoo. I'm sure it'll come in at twice that.I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.The State and Feds can start to make differences now in Jackson. City alone does not have a pot to pee in outside of NE Jackson.
Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.
My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
You forgot to throw in how everybody wants 'regulation' in college sports too, all of the sudden. So weird.Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.
My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.
Even for people who aren’t self interested, it’s not exactly hypocrisy to think that you should have local control and also, when that results in third world conditions, it’s better for state or federal entities to take control than it is to leave those people to suffer.
I mean i don't love a lot of federal dollars, but if everyone else is taking it?Oh, ok then, I need to update my notes so I remember that federal involvement at the local and state level is now liked and its even encouraged.
My notes still showed that federal involvement is bad, local power is best, small government is ideal, etc etc.
Do you always speak out of both sides of your mouth? Or is it only when you type?You forgot to throw in how everybody wants 'regulation' in college sports too, all of the sudden. So weird.
you can tell that lie on another website. You always crawfish when called out on your stupid comments.It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.
![]()
That is 90 percent of Jackson's "issues."
This the architectural drawing of the $500,000 "amphitheater" Chockwe is building at the zoo. I'm sure it'll come in at twice that.
View attachment 793070
Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?Jackson had local control and they couldn’t keep first world amenities like running water. I don’t think people who are self interested (which is basically anybody in Mississippi at this point) preferring state and federal involvement to having a state capital city without running water is the own you think it is.
Even for people who aren’t self interested, it’s not exactly hypocrisy to think that you should have local control and also, when that results in third world conditions, it’s better for state or federal entities to take control than it is to leave those people to suffer.
There's no question this thing is just a front for him to embezzle more money and get more kickbacks. What I think is funny is that even the architectural drawing looks cheap, and I'm sure if anything ever is built, it'll look a lot worse than that does. More likely, as you say, he bleeds all he can out of it and the project never actually gets built.Pat he's not building any amphitheater out there. Now that he's been given his release papers he will be grabbing every cent from every account available, that theater was just a last minute desperation plea for support so it may look like he was doing something to grab some votes. Now he may very well try to start something quickly there but it will only be to open the bank accounts for raiding. How long have they been talking about building a hotel at the convention center? Same ploy, hire somebody to do another "study" get money approved then skim off the top. Farish St, another ploy but they did pour some sidewalks and plant some trees and shrubs that got stolen before they had a chance to die.
They are going to have to get rid of a lot of people in Jackson before the ones that are tax paying law abiding citizens will return. Trying to get the ones that don't contribute and cause the issues is next to impossible because they don't have the will or means to leave. I did over 20 years in the metro and watched it predictably get worse and worse each passing year, hell I did those 20 years in the suburbs and watched them even go down because of Jackson, no way I'm going back to start over with Jackson but I do sincerely hope it does come back.The first step is to make it safe. Once this happens you can get real investment.
If Republicans convinced 100% of their constituents to come out and vote, and the Democrats added zero from the primaries, it would still be a landslide. With that level of control, I'd hope Bennie and Horhn would be willing to cross the aisle, sit down with TateR, and figure out how they could make Jackson a better place for all.To be fair, there's still a final vote. Kenny Gee won the Republican vote for mayor with 99 total votes. June 3 is the final vote.
You forgot. It's only wasteful federal spending when it's done in the interest of others.It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.
![]()
RATSTo make improvements a large part of Horhn's efforts will need to be attracting LEGITIMATE private investors. Jackson's sales tax base has gone (literally) and he has to find a way to get people to spend their money there again.
Is he a decent guy? I assumed he was just another grifter based on Bennie Thompson's endorsement. Literally know nothing else about him, but assumed whoever was not under indictment and was not endorsed by Bennie would have been the most decent candidate.
You okay man? I'm beginning to wonder if horshack stole your login.You forgot to throw in how everybody wants 'regulation' in college sports too, all of the sudden. So weird.
Are you worried about the average citizen in Jackson? 17 no.Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?
And let's face it, when the state comes in, they are protecting their own interests. They aren't worried about the average citizens of Jackson, and neither are you.
Federal grants are already available, for a number of things. They aren't the city savior either. They aren't going to come in and 'run' the city, it's for specific things, which come with strings attached. Which are good....but they still don't run the place.
I don't know if I'm always talking about cutting waste, but certainly I support cutting waste. I don't think the state or feds controlling the water system is going to be super efficient or anything by normal standards, but compared to the city spending money and not having a functioning water/sewer system, I do think the state or feds can clear that bar easily and be a big improvement.Aren't you always talking about cutting waste?
And let's face it, when the state comes in, they are protecting their own interests. They aren't worried about the average citizens of Jackson, and neither are you.
The specific things and strings attached are the savior with respect to attaining and keeping first world status. Running a water and sewer system is not rocket science. There are communities with relatively little human capital that manage to do it. Same with having paved roads and being reasonably safe within the CID. Jackson is presumably going to continue to be a 17ing basketcase of a city in general, but if there is enough state and federal control to have running water and sewer, paved streets, reasonably functioning law enforcement and justice system within the CID, there is enough there from state and federal offices plus being a population center in general that it can, if not become a thriving city, at least become the type of place that people don't want an explanation as to why you live there.Federal grants are already available, for a number of things. They aren't the city savior either. They aren't going to come in and 'run' the city, it's for specific things, which come with strings attached. Which are good....but they still don't run the place.
Again, I just don't know what that's going to be relevant to. Welcoming fed involvment is a combination of the very low standards that need to be met here (appoint a conservator so that clean running water is available in a city in the USA; something even the most skeptical libertarian I expect believes is within the capabilities of the feds) and self interest - every dollar the feds put in is probably $0.80-.90 the state doesn't have to put in.It isnt an attempt at an 'own'. And state involvement wasnt what I commented on. I commented only on wanting federal involvement.
It was me very casually noting that federal involvement was being hoped for, because maybe that will stick with some here moving forward and there will be fewer comments about 'Im from the federal government and am here to help' or that the federal government is just default corrupt/inept/dadebil.
![]()
Nah I'm just not buying the far-right's bullshlt just like I don't buy the far-left.You okay man? I'm beginning to wonder if horshack stole your login.
I understand what you mean, but you have to admit it's inconsistent. State and feds can't just prop up a city forever anyway. Maybe we get some help, but it's ultimately the goal of government to create an environment where private investment can safely do its thing. If the local government can't ultimately get their heads out of their assses, the people who are left will simply continue to move away.I don't know if I'm always talking about cutting waste, but certainly I support cutting waste. I don't think the state or feds controlling the water system is going to be super efficient or anything by normal standards, but compared to the city spending money and not having a functioning water/sewer system, I do think the state or feds can clear that bar easily and be a big improvement.
That's why I said self-interested and not charitable. I mean, I certainly do want residents of jackson to have clean running water just like I want anybody to have running water, but also certainly, if it wasn't the state capital and important for Mississippi to generally retain first world status, my appetite for spending federal and state money on it would be less. ETA: I also certainly would understand people from other states taking the position that Jackson voted itself into this mess and now they are getting what they voted for, good and hard and if somebody is going to bail them out it needs to be other Mississippians and not the feds.
The specific things and strings attached are the savior with respect to attaining and keeping first world status. Running a water and sewer system is not rocket science. There are communities with relatively little human capital that manage to do it. Same with having paved roads and being reasonably safe within the CID. Jackson is presumably going to continue to be a 17ing basketcase of a city in general, but if there is enough state and federal control to have running water and sewer, paved streets, reasonably functioning law enforcement and justice system within the CID, there is enough there from state and federal offices plus being a population center in general that it can, if not become a thriving city, at least become the type of place that people don't want an explanation as to why you live there.
I agree, its a good idea potentially involve them in whatever capacity will be beneficial.Again, I just don't know what that's going to be relevant to. Welcoming fed involvment is a combination of the very low standards that need to be met here (appoint a conservator so that clean running water is available in a city in the USA; something even the most skeptical libertarian I expect believes is within the capabilities of the feds) and self interest - every dollar the feds put in is probably $0.80-.90 the state doesn't have to put in.
Shocking take here, folks!!!****I actually do hope that Horhn can make some positive changes, but I don't expect much. There are too many problems, not enough tax base and very little community support. In stating that Jackson is very dangerous, lacks at least 200 officers, is impoverished as most who could move did, has extreme infrastructure issues and has a culture of those who lead wanting moreso to enrich themselves than solve problems, the degradation is entrenched. Yes, the Lumumba team has taken Jackson to the edge. Under the son's leadership, nothing positive occurred and he used his time to give out crony contracts for the purpose of kickbacks. I doubt much changes. Jackson, the hellhole it is, is officially dead.
The bulk of people who aren't delusional, and the ones that pay taxes overwhelmingly agree that the zoo should close.I will never understand why Jackson doesn't shut down their zoo. It's in a literal war zone that no one is going to. There must be some funding that's getting embezzled from the state or feds that's supposed to go to the zoo
Yet not one thing I said is incorrectShocking take here, folks!!!****
Hard to prove you wrong, for sure. Not only do you have to convince the existing Jacksonians to get on board, you also have to convince all the scared suburbanites and small towners that you can safely walk 3 feet inside the city limits and not be simultaneously stabbed and shot from 5 different directions. While I'm overembellishing the danger I am certainly not embellishing what Bubba from Pelahatchie and Christy Joe from Madison thinks. And the fear just magnifies the farther and farther away you get. I mean you have people like L4 who truly think it's Afghanistan.Yet not one thing I said is incorrect
Local government is not going to get their heads out of their asses anytime soon because that's not what voters want, or at least not what they vote for.I understand what you mean, but you have to admit it's inconsistent. State and feds can't just prop up a city forever anyway. Maybe we get some help, but it's ultimately the goal of government to create an environment where private investment can safely do its thing. If the local government can't ultimately get their heads out of their assses, the people who are left will simply continue to move away.
And lets be honest, the only area of Jackson that has a prayer is the CCID, which is lucky to be state-run due to its situation with all the state-owned land. But the mayor still has to meet them in the middle. Things like moving any decent attraction (like the zoo) to the CCID, are no-brainers. And any outside investments really need to be pointed to that area, unless the investor chooses otherwise. There should be no political barriers to downtown development.
Well, now we know why the city is a literal hell-hole.As someone that spends most of their time in the metro area this election is a good thing.