Time will tell lady. We will see. All I know is he's using the same tone now as he has in saying he's right. What if he does prove major fraud has happened? I'll accept it if he is proven wrong, and concedes. Will you accept the results if Trump is proven right, again?
Aside from proving voter fraud, which he tried and failed to prove in the past with his own hand-picked commission, is Trump's goal simply to wreak havoc on the nation and have his fragile ego massaged?
I ask because surely he doesn't really believe he has grounds to give him back the election. I keep reading and hearing the opinions of Trump fans that it is simply impossible for him to lose by the amount of votes he's losing by and that is not based in reality.
Trump's won in 2016, over a historically bad candidate who forgot to campaign in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, by winning those three states by a combined 77,000 votes. As it currently stands, he stands to lose Michigan alone by nearly twice that much.
The last three states that seemingly have held some hesitation to project for Biden are Georgia, Nevada and Arizona. Biden leads those three states by roughly 64,000 combined votes.
My point for bringing up all this is to show how far Trump would have to reach to actually prove there was a level of fraud high enough to turn this election for him.
Trump lost. Period. He won in 2016, and contrary to what I'm sure you're going to tell me, I don't believe it was because of Russian interference. It was because the Democrats thought it was Hillary's turn, not realizing how disliked she was and not accepting the reality that a good portion of the country wanted a white male back in office after 8 years of Barack Obama.
Joe Biden won in 2020 because he ran against his opponent's character and record at the time the campaign kicked into high gear.
Donald Trump lost in 2020 because he displayed his character and ran against his opponent's son.