The Save Act

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,457
32,434
113


Stealing an election was a gamble.


A serious and dangerous one.


The globalists put all their money on the distraction of the plandemic, the brainwashed left, and a strategically placed and weaponized judiciary to hold the election “legitimacy line,” no matter what evidence of fraud came to light.


They cheated not just in one big way, and not only in swing states. That would have been too obvious.


They cheated in every way possible, with mail-in ballots, Dominion tabulations, and while “counting” votes.


But because all pre-election polls were intentionally manipulated to make the steal less alarming, they had no way to predict how many legal votes for Trump there would be.


THIS WAS THE BIGGEST FLAW IN THEIR PLAN!


Fast-forward to election night…


Things were immediately crazy. Trump was doing well all over the map, even in states considered Trump-proof.


Trump was approaching record-breaking territory.


The cheaters should have paid more attention to the pre-election Trump support in California. (If they followed me here, they would have!)


But they were too busy planning the steal to worry about ACTUAL Trump support.


The LEGAL ballots were irrelevant… until election day.


They had to load thousands of Biden faux ballots in unexpected places, which drove up the total to unexpected levels.


Then, the linchpin: Fox News called Arizona for Biden immediately, even with a large Trump lead.


It was the APB to all involved in the steal.


Someone made a call and shut down counting in states that needed time to usher in fake, no-crease “mail-in Biden ballots” and make adjustments to the Dominion counts, feeding and re-feeding Biden ballots over and over.


Who the heck made that call?


Maybe ask Bret Baier or Martha.


Remember the “water main emergency” in Georgia that somehow lined up with the shutdown of counting in multiple states and later, wasn’t a water main emergency?


What? Come on, now…


People went to bed with Trump leading and woke up to an 81-million-vote victory for the guy who hid in his basement.


Those of us who watched the chaos throughout the night saw Trump LOSE tens of thousands of votes, not just once but several times, and on live TV.


The election results were a sloppy, unbelievable mess, and the election crimes were random, like panic-driven carelessness often is.


But this randomness also saved the globalists from immediate exposure.


Then, the fallout began, first as a trickle, then a flood.


Over 2,000 affidavits were filed (then ignored) by election workers (both parties, under penalty of perjury) who saw irregular activity.


Videos surfaced of ballots by the thousands being dropped off at dark docks late at night at locations where we’d been told counting had stopped and workers went home.


Who let these ballot-droppers in with their “special delivery”?


Then there was the impossible, non-partisan math.


Sadly, a disturbing percentage of US citizens were—and still are—okay with a stolen election as long as Trump is not President.


There is NO SUCH THING as a FREE country without FAIR elections.


@LeaderJohnThune PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT!
 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,017
11,957
113
Thats true but I think everything ended up being thrown out when the case was ended. It was a scam by Fani and the commie dems anyway and everyone knows it.
Some people plead guilty to prevent lawfare and spending all their resources against lawyers that have an unlimited supply of taxpayer money. That's why the FEDS have such a high conviction rate. It not always that their case is airtight, it's people don't have the money/resources to fight them.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,454
20,863
113
IMO cheating in elections should be right up there with murder and other heinous crimes. It's a crime against all of us.
Then Trump must hang right? We have actual concrete proof of his multiple attempts to cheat as opposed to the imaginary Democratic fraud you've been fooled into believing, yet you give him a total pass. So can you state for the record that you agree we should put him on trial?

1773592415136.png


 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,454
20,863
113
Some people plead guilty to prevent lawfare and spending all their resources against lawyers that have an unlimited supply of taxpayer money. That's why the FEDS have such a high conviction rate. It not always that their case is airtight, it's people don't have the money/resources to fight them.
LMAO, Hambone, they were actually guilty!

“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have... Fellas, I need 11,000 votes, give me a break."



1773594034275.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,457
32,434
113
X post from a Democrat.



For years, I held my tongue about the 2020 election. I was cautious and, like many, was forced to censor myself so I wouldn’t be pegged as unpatriotic or an ultra-MAGA supporter. But no more. In my opinion (and I have a right to my opinion), the 2020 and 2022 elections were rigged. I was one of the 36% of Democrats who believed that.

I admit I had no evidence, but I have common sense. This is why I believe it.

We have been asking for election integrity for years, and now that it’s here, some people are against it? It’s overdue, and if this doesn’t pass, it will be the biggest blow to trust in our election process. There is only one reason anyone wouldn’t want this to pass, and that is because they know the 2020 election was rigged to try to beat the current president, and it will be harder to cheat.

There was never a thorough audit of what happened in 2020. They did a half-hearted effort and then told us to “be quiet. There’s nothing to see here” when we all saw irregularities that night. Thirty-six percent of Democrats (I was one of them) believed something was wrong that night when six swing states had Trump either leading or taking over, they closed at the same time, boxes got pulled from under tables, Republican poll watchers got told to leave, and we woke up the next morning to see Biden ahead by just enough. But most of that 36% were okay with it because their guy won. It still wasn’t right.

In one county, 130,000 votes were cast for Biden in a row, not one vote for Trump. That is statistically impossible in a part of that state where voters were polled at 70(Biden)/30(Trump), and they really want me to believe that Trump didn’t get one vote out of that number?

We had ballots from New York being sent to Pennsylvania, as admitted by one driver who was told to do so, and it’s highly likely that was where the illegal immigrants came into play.

We literally had a truckload of votes from a red area dumped in a ditch.

They were stuffing ballot boxes with bags of ballots, and they told us it never happened, when even Democrats were caught two years later in their own primaries doing it to each other. This is a fact. In another Democrat-only election, they found a thumb drive that altered the election results, causing a judge to reverse the results. This is a fact.

They delayed any real audit of what happened, so most of the evidence of it could be hidden. Then they tried to shame anyone who questioned it.

The SAVE ACT must pass, or I will never have faith in our voting system again.

It is worth it. Our election process is the most important aspect of being American. If that isn’t secure, we fall to absolute corruption.

That has nothing to do with MAGA! It has everything to do with being an American who cares about election integrity. I want to win or lose knowing our system is secure, and we should take every measure to ensure this.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,689
3,424
113
dpic, this really makes the case against adding any voting limits to those we have. And what better or more knowledgeable person to announce that this is a fascist takeover of our democracy.

Of course, you do realize that for every person who has the view you have shared, there is an equal and opposite view from someone who has equal or greater credentials that the two individuals you cite.

So, with all due respect, I'm not sure what intrinsic value either this or the potential post of someone with opposite views really adds to the conversations.

I think fetterman has the right idea...he's all for voter ID, but against the SAVE act - he thinks it goes too far especially with mail in ballots. It almost seems like a compromise..a word which has fallen into disfavor in our government
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
32,922
8,329
113
This just goes to show you how stupid and uninformed you are. Neither one of them was ever charged for cheating in an election.
Well, this post will probably elicit a hail of curse words and other invective from you but ces't la vie., I find it entertaining.

You dummy. Pretty much every criminal charge for which Tina Peters was convicted (and received a nine year prison sentence) is an election related criminal charge. Don't want to believe me? Here are the details, direct from The Heritage Foundation:

 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,185
13,056
102
Some people plead guilty to prevent lawfare and spending all their resources against lawyers that have an unlimited supply of taxpayer money. That's why the FEDS have such a high conviction rate. It not always that their case is airtight, it's people don't have the money/resources to fight them.

oh boy. I would say something insulting to you right now, but I actually feel sorry for you. You gotta wake up every day and be you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,689
3,424
113
oh boy. I would say something insulting to you right now, but I actually feel sorry for you. You gotta wake up every day and be you.
I don't have this experience with government, but I can tell you that occurs in industry. Companies have multitudes of lawyers on their payrolls, plaintiffs have to pay by the hour. Cost to proceed might exceed any potential recoveries and vice versa...company might determine its cheaper to settle than to proceed..so they settle and move on
 

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,185
13,056
102
I don't have this experience with government, but I can tell you that occurs in industry. Companies have multitudes of lawyers on their payrolls, plaintiffs have to pay by the hour. Cost to proceed might exceed any potential recoveries and vice versa...company might determine its cheaper to settle than to proceed..so they settle and move on

When a company settles a lawsuit, they're not admitting guilt. Very, very different than someone saying they're guilty of committing a crime because they don't want to pay for lawyers. This is just a foolish, foolish argument to make.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,689
3,424
113
When a company settles a lawsuit, they're not admitting guilt. Very, very different than someone saying they're guilty of committing a crime because they don't want to pay for lawyers. This is just a foolish, foolish argument to make.
you're right. I guess though it's a risk reward for the defendant. Is it worth it to get a slap on the risk by pleading guilty, or spend your money to hire and pay lawyers when your chance of beating the charge is a low percentage.

I imagine some people have taken the slap and saved their money and others haven't . Depends on the situation I assume.
 

CTN-1

Heisman
Sep 28, 2018
9,162
13,457
113
you're right. I guess though it's a risk reward for the defendant. Is it worth it to get a slap on the risk by pleading guilty, or spend your money to hire and pay lawyers when your chance of beating the charge is a low percentage.

I imagine some people have taken the slap and saved their money and others haven't . Depends on the situation I assume.
“Slap on the risk”??
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,454
20,863
113
I don't have this experience with government, but I can tell you that occurs in industry. Companies have multitudes of lawyers on their payrolls, plaintiffs have to pay by the hour. Cost to proceed might exceed any potential recoveries and vice versa...company might determine its cheaper to settle than to proceed..so they settle and move on
Surely you're not trying to trying to imply these cases may not be legitimate so they settled, are you? C'mon Ned, you know better than that.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,457
32,434
113


John Solomon releases information on Chinese interference in the 2020 elections. The most significant part:

"Officials told Tust the News that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John
Ratcliffe are working to declassify a
potentially explosive tranche of
documents showing what China did
and who in U.S. government knew and when."

Q Post # 4524 dated Jun 25, 2020:
Good catch. Coincidence?
Important people understand for future events.
Assumption or intel based?
All assets [F][D] deployed.
[D] + China = 11.3
Q

We are now one step closer to 11.3...
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,689
3,424
113
What's your point? I shouldn't share the opinions of people on the other side of the aisle, even if they were beaten within an inch of their life over election fraud conspiracies? I'd be happy to add the thoughts of people with higher credentials if you'd like. I have millions to pick from...
no, my point was that just because someone has an opinion, it's not necessarily right.

Tiger growls or fatpiggy could come up with quotes from someone exactly the opposite of what you shared. I'd imagine that if they did, you wouldn't accept them as correct. That's my point
What's your point? I shouldn't share the opinions of people on the other side of the aisle, even if they were beaten within an inch of their life over election fraud conspiracies? I'd be happy to add the thoughts of people with higher credentials if you'd like. I have millions to pick from...

Surely you're not trying to trying to imply these cases may not be legitimate so they settled, are you? C'mon Ned, you know better than that.
cases might be legitimate, plaintiff likely would not file if they didn't feel they had a case. I'm suggesting, because I've been on the decision side, that companies weight cost/benefit to spending hours and hours of lawyer's and management time, court costs etc against cost of a potential settlement, and decide to settle as opposed to continuing. I'd submit it happens more often than you might imagine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Chumpsky

All-Conference
Oct 19, 2025
3,089
4,812
113
3834.jpg

We're losing, time to disenfranchise a bunch of voters.

I guess governing responsibly and well so people will vote for you is not an option?
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,457
32,434
113


Congress can't pass the SAVE Act because they know all about this. Prove this wrong. Because Trump is going to expose it all anyway ...

"The tabulator logs from the Maricopa County 2020 and 2022 elections demonstrate clearly that the machine behavior settings (MBS) and the database versions that existed on the tabulators used in those elections were not approved by the EAC certification of Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) Democracy Suite version 5.5B.

The MBS file and the database version could not have been produced by the DVS version 5.5B. The election software Maricopa County used in November 2020 and November 2022 elections has been materially altered from the EAC and Arizona Secretary of State certified DVD D-Suite 5.5B. Any representation that this is the same golden image that the EAC approved is false."

The Maricopa EMS has a compiler installed that provides the ability to modify and create executable files and drivers on the fly that could be used to alter election results without detection. There is evidence new executable files were created at least three times during the active voting period in 2020." - Ben Cotton
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,457
32,434
113
Here is the weasel otherwise known as John Thune trying to explain how the senate is doing nothing. He basically is just admitting that a large number of republican senators are RINOs just waiting to be activated at any time. Interesting interview. Also interesting that Fox didnt ask him about the pro forma sessions being used to stop Trump appointments.