I'm sorry, you guys are making me dizzy. Am I being punked? I was simply trying to figure out why Salem was ranked so low. I have no misconceptions on who Dinwiddie is, I just have seen a lot written to the idea that Salem was down this year. I don't know how you can watch that game and say 1 team is that better than the other. No one is trying to get anyone riled up, although that does not seem all that difficult to do. I don't have time to figure out if it is related to reading comprehension or personality disorders. But for me I am simply an information seeker, I was wondering why. Now, about Courtland being #1
If I may drop by to offer my two cents.....
First, to address the Dinwiddie game. Yes, that was a pretty evenly-played game. An exciting, dramatic contest, but a very sloppily-played one. The thing is, both teams had significant mitigating factors that night: Dinwiddie was without K'vaughan Pope, and Salem imitated the Keystone Kops with an avalanche of penalties and turnovers. So, those factors throw into doubt how accurate a picture that game on September 8 painted of how Dinwiddie and Salem stack up against each other. Even with all the fumbles, Salem would have prevailed, if not for an amazing one-handed catch on fourth down by Josiah Williams. But again - the Generals were without the elder Pope. It remains to be seen whether or not Salem coming so close to knocking off Dinwiddie was some kind of fool's gold for us Spartan fans. I fear it might have been.
As far as Salem's current ranking, I'm not sure where the Spartans belong, and it really doesn't matter. Put simply, this is definitely
not the Salem team of the past three or four years. Reasons being:
~Defensive capability. This is not a good defensive team, period. Other Salem posters have offered reasons why, and people like Shabutie can give you far better X's and O's explanations than I can. I'd say the biggest surprise and disappointment thus far has been the play of the secondary, all of whom are seniors with a good degree of experience. There also hasn't been much at all in the area of a consistent
effective pass rush. Against the three likely playoff teams the Spartans have played thus far (Amherst, Dinwiddie, Blacksburg), the defense has surrendered an average of 32.67 points per game. In all games, the first-team defense has allowed 17.5 points per game.Tackling overall has been bad. Every opponent thus far has experienced some success in moving the ball. Franklin County ran the ball well for a half; Northside hit short passes at will the entire game. Even lowly Christiansburg looked competent on offense their first two possessions, before they started booting the ball around the stadium. It seems to me much of the tackling problem could be rectified, but even so, I just don't see this team ever being strong enough defensively to win Region D this season, let alone Class 4. The two most telling moments came in the Dinwiddie and Blacksburg games. Dinwiddie went eighty yards in less than two minutes to score the winning touchdown, and really didn't encounter that much resistance in doing so. K'ymon Pope and company made all the plays, while no one on Salem's D stepped up. The Blacksburg situation was just downright sickening. The Spartans had kind of clawed their way back into it at 21-12, and were to receive the second half kickoff. Blacksburg had fourteen seconds left in the half, from their own twenty yard line. Now,
everyone in the place expected the Bruins to hand off to Beck, and throw to Terry. That's exactly what Blacksburg did - and in two plays scored a back-breaking TD to effectively end it. And had the field been five hundred yards long, Terry
still would have scored, as he was completely untouched on the play. A complete debacle for Salem that kind of encapsulates how the season's gone defensively.
~Quarterback play. To be fair, Gladden had about the toughest possible act to follow in Noah Beckley. In stark contrast to his predecessor, Gladden to this point has shown very limited mobility. Unlike Dinwiddie's Pope, he doesn't possess the speed or quickness to extend plays or make plays on his own by running. Gladden has thrown some good balls in all ranges, but has also been inconsistent short, medium, and long. To his credit, he hasn't seemed to have panicked on too many occasions, and tried to force balls where there is no opening, as many young high school qb's tend to do. But the inconsistency he's shown thus far in hitting the key short- and medium-range passes on third down - so crucial to Salem's offense - leads me to have serious doubts about the Spartans being able to win any shootouts precipitated by the team's defensive weaknesses. The good news is, Gladden's passing should keep improving with practice and more game experience. But Salem just doesn't have a running threat at quarterback this year - unless Wade moves there. I wonder if we will see that happen for a few series a game as the season winds down, similar to how Matt Hill and the Fisher kid (don't remember which one) rotated during the 2011 season. Gladden in fact reminds me of Hill from early in his varsity career.
~Team chemistry. Not much to say here - Salem thus far has just seemed to lack "it", whatever "it" may be. As I offered in a different thread, the whole has been
less than the sum of the parts, through game six. As to reasons why - it's up to debate (by others).
As of today, I think the Spartans' ceiling is probably the regional semifinals; possibly the regional finals, if everything falls right. The penalties and turnovers can and should be ironed out, and indeed, Salem played a very clean game in that regard against C'burg. However, that still leaves some significant weaknesses, primarily on the defensive side of the ball. If Salem cleans up the things that need addressing, Gladden keeps improving,
and everyone stays healthy, I think the Spartans are fully capable of defeating any team in the region besides Blacksburg, Glass, and possibly Charlottesville. For the reasons stated above, it's hard for me today to envision beating any two of those three in succession. I sure hope I'm wrong. The lack of intensity and emotional investment shown by Salem the entire game against Blacksburg really makes me wonder just how much we learned that night. Aside from learning that, for the biggest game of the regular season, Salem displayed a lack of intensity and emotional investment. That's probably quite telling in and of itself. I
would like to see the Bruins again. Not in a "Yeah, bring 'em on!" way, but more of in a needing-to-atone kind of way.