Trapezoid of Terror Update, Along with Football Practice Facility

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,289
82,780
113
"We are doing some final tweaks to the master plan,” Hobbs explained. “We expect that we will release that sometime in the fall. That will then be combined with fundraising efforts around that. What we have talked about publicly in the past is that we need an indoor practice facility for our football program. That is a missing ingredient for Greg.”

"In this new world of NIL, it is sort of less of a focus of young people in terms of decision-making. But that is an asset that we actually need for the program. It is long overdue; to replace the bubble or if we continue to use the bubble, we can repurpose that.”


We need an upgrade, we need a renovation of Jersey Mike’s Arena,” Hobbs said. “We are at work. We have an RFP out for a feasibility study. We have actually done the interviews now with the architect so we’ll have an architectural firm getting granular on a renovation; what that would look like. For anybody who is reading this, we will preserve the wild, raucous environment, making sure it remains the Trapezoid of Terror.”

 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,626
1,757
113
Wild guess: despite the assurances and no one having seen final designs yet, posters will find something to complain about with that statement.
Good, here's the first complaint ... the season's been over for three months already and the renovations haven't started.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dasonata259

Skull83

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2001
2,411
3,224
98
Posted this in the identical thread on the football board, I think the most significant part of the statement is this-: "In this new world of NIL, it is sort of less of a focus of young people in terms of decision-making." That's something a lot of people have opined on here, but it's interesting to see it confirmed by our AD.
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
13,604
12,367
0
Posted this in the identical thread on the football board, I think the most significant part of the statement is this-: "In this new world of NIL, it is sort of less of a focus of young people in terms of decision-making." That's something a lot of people have opined on here, but it's interesting to see it confirmed by our AD.

How many times has a free agent said "I turned down additional money so I could play at MetLife Stadium. It's so much nicer than Giants Stadium that it was worth taking less money"?

As long as you are above a minimum threshold, I doubt "facilities" makes much of a difference.
Or has ever made much of a difference.
The old and dated RAC certainly hasn't hindered recruiting so far.

Are football players really not coming here because of the bubble?
Or is it because the team stinks?
"I know Rutgers went 10-2 last year and beat OSU and PSU. But I just can't see myself practicing in a bubble."
 

hinson32

All-American
Jul 29, 2005
7,630
5,700
57
How many times has a free agent said "I turned down additional money so I could play at MetLife Stadium. It's so much nicer than Giants Stadium that it was worth taking less money"?

As long as you are above a minimum threshold, I doubt "facilities" makes much of a difference.
Or has ever made much of a difference.
The old and dated RAC certainly hasn't hindered recruiting so far.

Are football players really not coming here because of the bubble?
Or is it because the team stinks?
"I know Rutgers went 10-2 last year and beat OSU and PSU. But I just can't see myself practicing in a bubble."
The old and dated RAC is now one of biggest advantages in recruiting.
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
28,283
26,857
113
How many times has a free agent said "I turned down additional money so I could play at MetLife Stadium. It's so much nicer than Giants Stadium that it was worth taking less money"?

As long as you are above a minimum threshold, I doubt "facilities" makes much of a difference.
Or has ever made much of a difference.
The old and dated RAC certainly hasn't hindered recruiting so far.

Are football players really not coming here because of the bubble?
Or is it because the team stinks?
"I know Rutgers went 10-2 last year and beat OSU and PSU. But I just can't see myself practicing in a bubble."
Agree we just need to get to the minimum threshold. We are not there now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: William J. Leggett

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
25,976
12,147
113
I find it odd that this “story” has gotten so much traction when there’s really no “new news”.
We all knew a plan was coming. I actually thought it was going to be unveiled in June.
So the only actual news here is that it’s now delayed until the fall.
The plan is important but what really matters is the financial resources to pay for the renovations which likely will delay construction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
13,604
12,367
0
The old and dated RAC is now one of biggest advantages in recruiting.

Once the team got good first.
Nothing has changed at the RAC in the last decade than the success of the team.
If the team wasn't winning then the RAC isn't a recruiting advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dconifer

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
220,731
109,135
63
Based on my little knowledge of development and how long it takes to get permits and sign off in New Jersey, the earliest season, this would be ready is probably after the 24–25 year
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,846
16,117
0
I would not be heartbroken if the renovations are years off
I’m okay if we move forward but keep the core in tact. We have to deal with that front concourse issue and there’s so much underutilized space out in front of the RAC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,846
16,117
0
Based on my little knowledge of development and how long it takes to get permits and sign off in New Jersey, the earliest season, this would be ready is probably after the 24–25 year
Sounds reasonable.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Based on my little knowledge of development and how long it takes to get permits and sign off in New Jersey, the earliest season, this would be ready is probably after the 24–25 year
Rutgers is a state institution. They don’t got to go through much of the bs private developers have to as far as permits and inspections .
 

Rufaninga

All-Conference
Oct 8, 2010
3,873
4,407
0
And our 2025 recruits?
Obviously it’s very early but I would assume we shouldn’t expect 2024 to be a one off and recruiting just drops off a cliff.

At some point we’ll have to rip off the bandaid.
Were Rutgers. I fully expect a #1 recruiting class for 2024. Then COVID 2.0 hits and takes out the next 3 seasons of basketball.
 

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,646
9,802
58
Rutgers is a state institution. They don’t got to go through much of the bs private developers have to as far as permits and inspections .
What permitting and inspection requirements do you think Rutgers is exempt from? In addition, do you have any idea how much bureaucracy is involved when a public entity tries to build something?
 

Sir ScarletKnight

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2015
1,809
1,513
0


Trapezoid of luxury

Two things jump out to me. One is that I can't see how you hold onto that same level of noise with those two lounges underneath the stands. There's just too much space for it to escape. The second is that it looks like they are shifting the student section to have space right behind the benches.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
What permitting and inspection requirements do you think Rutgers is exempt from? In addition, do you have any idea how much bureaucracy is involved when a public entity tries to build something?
A lot of them . Do you think rutgers and hobbs is sitting through piscataway zoning board meetings to get an approval ?
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
25,976
12,147
113
I don't see any increased seating projections.A 8000 seat RAC is too small .A renovation costing at least 100 million better increase attendance to at least 10,000.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,584
0
Reading through this thread it is interesting that all anyone seems concerned with is recruits. Don't spend money on facilities because the recruits want the money directly.

What about the fan experience?

I still maintain they need to a HUGE job and save money towards that rather than some largely cosmetic thing. The big job would be build an exterior-supported roof shell over the whole damn thing then tear the current roof and interior columns, do wrap-around seating and expand the concourse footprint.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Reading through this thread it is interesting that all anyone seems concerned with is recruits. Don't spend money on facilities because the recruits want the money directly.

What about the fan experience?

I still maintain they need to a HUGE job and save money towards that rather than some largely cosmetic thing. The big job would be build an exterior-supported roof shell over the whole damn thing then tear the current roof and interior columns, do wrap-around seating and expand the concourse footprint.
Fan experience is much better when team wins
 

Queztastic

Senior
Nov 1, 2013
831
499
0
I don't see any increased seating projections.A 8000 seat RAC is too small .A renovation costing at least 100 million better increase attendance to at least 10,000.
Looks like they try to fit a few extra seats in the lower corners, but my guess is that's only a few hundred more.
 

RU-Kidding

All-Conference
Nov 6, 2001
11,625
1,914
81
Looks like they try to fit a few extra seats in the lower corners, but my guess is that's only a few hundred more.
Just put in Frontier Airline sized seats and we'll easily fit 10,000 or more.
 
Last edited:

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,646
9,802
58
A lot of them . Do you think rutgers and hobbs is sitting through piscataway zoning board meetings to get an approval ?
Rutgers is legally exempt from local zoning requirements, and so, yes, Hobbs doesn't have to sit through zoning board meetings. But I can tell you that as a practical matter Rutgers is not going to move ahead with a major project without Piscataway being OK with it.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Rutgers is legally exempt from local zoning requirements, and so, yes, Hobbs doesn't have to sit through zoning board meetings. But I can tell you that as a practical matter Rutgers is not going to move ahead with a major project without Piscataway being OK with it.
Huh ??? Rutgers allowed alcohol sales at the stadium and piscataway was not ok with it .
 

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,646
9,802
58
Huh ??? Rutgers allowed alcohol sales at the stadium and piscataway was not ok with it .
This is a land use matter -- that's different. And I can assure you there are lots of other requirements (many imposed by the state itself) that Rutgers is not going to be exempt from, including requirements that apply only to public institutions. As a matter of reality, this project will need to go through a lot of red tape.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
This is a land use matter -- that's different. And I can assure you there are lots of other requirements (many imposed by the state itself) that Rutgers is not going to be exempt from, including requirements that apply only to public institutions. As a matter of reality, this project will need to go through a lot of red tape.

Of course there is red tape . It’s NJ and construction . But it will be less red tape than say a plum street developer llc has to go through . That was my point