People are snubbing their nose at Kiffin's record as HC.
I'm not saying he needs to be the first phone call or that there aren't better options. I'm just saying he needs to be on the list and at least get an interview.
Folks, he has a winning record as a college HC. Same goes for Sark who took over a bottom feeder washington program and got them on a competitive and stable track with in just a two years.
He didn't do so hot in the pros as one of the younger HCs if not youngest. Not to mention it was with the Raiders.
Rich Brooks didn't have a winning record in either college or pros.
Folks are also getting hung up on violations. They are simply part of it.
How do you think Harbaugh gets Stanford to a top 20 program that can compete with and beat USC and Oregon? Following rules and strict academic standards?
How do you think he gets Michigan to bounce back so fast?...word from some folks is that he is racking up the infractions...he doesn't care, michigan doesn't care, ncaa doesn't care.
Petrino? No body in college football world seems to be concerned about him, it's a good ole fashioned slobber fest and redemption story right now.
All we have to do is investigate in house, self report, suspend a soccer coach and tutor, move on. If something is bad enough the NCAA may investigate Furman and put them on probabtion.
Same goes for all other coaches and programs, especially those that are winning.
Would also like to mention that UK has one of the better compliance departments. Hell, it almost seems like they pride themselves on not winning at all costs and toeing the line.
I think Kiffin has been humbled and learned a lot in his fall from grace and would not take another chance for granted because in all likely could be his last.
Again, he doesn't have to be at the top of the list. There are about 6 other guys I would love to see in the conversation if things come to that. However, I do not believe UK is in a position to be totally writing guys off.