Vaccines for children

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,525
21,291
113
don't know from vaccines. My kids got all the shots as prescribed by their doctors.

I do agree that we need to work harder to figure a reason for autism. There is a reason why we have greater occurrences now than in the past. We just don't know why.

I've explained on detail many times in the past. If you really want to know *I'll be glad to share.

The TLDR version is a change to how it's diagnosed and the combining of previously separated conditions such as Asperger's which are all now included under Autism Spectrum Disorder.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113
I've explained on detail many times in the past. If you really want to know *I'll be glad to share.

The TLDR version is a change to how it's diagnosed and the combining of previously separated conditions such as Asperger's which are all now included under Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Professor Yoshi educating the unwashed masses on autism and flat earth.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113


🚨RFK Jr. Set to Reveal Causes of Autism Epidemic Next Month — Here’s What Could Be Mentioned 👇


1️⃣ Hyper-vaccination — 72-dose CDC schedule (untested, illegal)


2️⃣ Pesticides — repeatedly linked to autism-like traits & rising rates


3️⃣ Tylenol — mounting evidence of prenatal & early-life risk
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
8,438
17,223
113


🚨RFK Jr. Set to Reveal Causes of Autism Epidemic Next Month — Here’s What Could Be Mentioned 👇


1️⃣ Hyper-vaccination — 72-dose CDC schedule (untested, illegal)


2️⃣ Pesticides — repeatedly linked to autism-like traits & rising rates


3️⃣ Tylenol — mounting evidence of prenatal & early-life risk

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113


🚨RFK Jr. Set to Reveal Causes of Autism Epidemic Next Month — Here’s What Could Be Mentioned 👇


1️⃣ Hyper-vaccination — 72-dose CDC schedule (untested, illegal)


2️⃣ Pesticides — repeatedly linked to autism-like traits & rising rates


3️⃣ Tylenol — mounting evidence of prenatal & early-life risk

They promised evidence based science and yet they keep rolling out these quacks who only deliver evidence-free brain worm theories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113

You "think" you're winning but America is losing and if I were you, I'd take the time to read his resignation letter to understand the horror being inflicted on us by this brain-worm infected administration.


My resignation letter from CDC.

Dear Dr. Houry,

I am writing to formally resign from my position as Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), effective August 28, 2025, close of business. I am happy to stay on for two weeks to provide transition, if requested.

This decision has not come easily, as I deeply value the work that the CDC does in safeguarding public health and am proud of my contributions to that critical mission. However, after much contemplation and reflection on recent developments and perspectives brought to light by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I find that the views he and his staff have shared challenge my ability to continue in my current role at the agency and in the service of the health of the American people. Enough is enough.

While I hold immense respect for the institution and my colleagues, I believe that it is imperative to align my professional responsibilities to my system of ethics and my understanding of the science of infectious disease, immunology, and my promise to serve the American people. This step is necessary to ensure that I can contribute effectively in a capacity that allows me to remain true to my principles.

I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health. The recent change in the adult and children’s immunization schedule threaten the lives of the youngest Americans and pregnant people. The data analyses that supported this decision have never been shared with CDC despite my respectful requests to HHS and other leadership. This lack of meaningful engagement was further compounded by a “frequently asked questions” document written to support the Secretary’s directive that was circulated by HHS without input from CDC subject matter experts and that cited studies that did not support the conclusions that were attributed to these authors. Having worked in local and national public health for years, I have never experienced such radical non-transparency, nor have I seen such unskilled manipulation of data to achieve a political end rather than the good of the American people.

It is untenable to serve in an organization that is not afforded the opportunity to discuss decisions of scientific and public health importance released under the moniker of CDC. The lack of communication by HHS and other CDC political leadership that culminates in social media posts announcing major policy changes without prior notice demonstrate a disregard of normal communication channels and common sense. Having to retrofit analyses and policy actions to match inadequately thought-out announcements in poorly scripted videos or page long X posts should not be how organizations responsible for the health of people should function. Some examples include the announcement of the change in the COVID-19 recommendations for children and pregnant people, the firing of scientists from ACIP by X post and an op-ed rather than direct communication with these valuable experts, the announcement of new ACIP members by X before onboarding and vetting have completed, and the release of term of reference for an ACIP workgroup that ignored all feedback from career staff at CDC.

The recent term of reference for the COVID vaccine work group created by this ACIP puts people of dubious intent and more dubious scientific rigor in charge of recommending vaccine policy to a director hamstrung and sidelined by an authoritarian leader. Their desire to please a political base will result in death and disability of vulnerable children and adults. Their base should be the people they serve not a political voting bloc.

I have always been first to challenge scientific and public health dogma in my career and was excited by the opportunity to do so again. I was optimistic that there would be an opportunity to brief the Secretary about key topics such as measles, avian influenza, and the highly coordinated approach to the respiratory virus season. Such briefings would allow exchange of ideas and a shared path to support the vision of “Making America Healthy Again.” We are seven months into the new administration, and no CDC subject matter expert from my Center has ever briefed the Secretary. I am not sure who the Secretary is listening to, but it is quite certainly not to us. Unvetted and conflicted outside organizations seem to be the sources HHS use over the gold standard science of CDC and other reputable sources. At a hearing, Secretary Kennedy said that Americans should not take medical advice from him. To the contrary, an appropriately briefed and inquisitive Secretary should be a source of health information for the people he serves. As it stands now, I must agree with him, that he should not be considered a source of accurate information.

The intentional eroding of trust in low-risk vaccines favoring natural infection and unproven remedies will bring us to a pre-vaccine era where only the strong will survive and many if not all will suffer. I believe in nutrition and exercise. I believe in making our food supply healthier, and I also believe in using vaccines to prevent death and disability. Eugenics plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated and is derivative of a legacy that good medicine and science should continue to shun.

The recent shooting at CDC is not why I am resigning. My grandfather, who I am named after, stood up to fascist forces in Greece and lost his life doing so. I am resigning to make him and his legacy proud. I am resigning because of the cowardice of a leader that cannot admit that HIS and his minions’ words over decades created an environment where violence like this can occur. I reject his and his colleagues’ thoughts and prayers, and advise they direct those to people that they have not actively harmed.

For decades, I have been a trusted voice for the LGBTQ community when it comes to critical health topics. I must also cite the recklessness of the administration in their efforts to erase transgender populations, cease critical domestic and international HIV programming, and terminate key research to support equity as part of my decision.

Public health is not merely about the health of the individual, but it is about the health of the community, the nation, the world. The nation’s health security is at risk and is in the hands of people focusing on ideological self-interest.

I want to express my heartfelt gratitude for the opportunities for growth, learning, and collaboration that I have been afforded during my time at the CDC. It has been a privilege to work alongside such dedicated professionals who are committed to improving the health and well-being of communities across the nation even when under attack from within both physically and psychologically.

Thank you once again for the support and guidance I have received from you and previous CDC leadership throughout my tenure. I wish the CDC continued success in its vital mission and that HHS reverse its dangerous course to dismantle public health as a practice and as an institution. If they continue the current path, they risk our personal well-being and the security of the United States.

Sincerely,
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113
They won't care.... Until someone they love dies and then they will blame Libs somehow.
No doubt- these soulless pigs think experts in their fields are their enemy and would gladly fire them all and happily welcome the next pandemic so they can display how little they care about any medical intervention that could save millions of lives. Because other people dying is just fine as long as they don't have to be incovenienced by visiting a pharmacy for five minutes. That'll show the libs.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113



Robert F Kennedy Jr is planning on changing the Hepatitis B Vaccine recommendation for newborns and already paid off Big Pharma spokespeople oppose it

Here’s the truth, “There was a study that was covered up by the CDC that showed a 1135% increase in autism with kids that got the hepatitis B vaccine”

“Do you know when they get the hepatitis B vaccine? I'll tell you.

They get it right when they're born, within an hour or two. Why do they get this vaccine, you ask? It's to eliminate STDs. Unless your child is coming out the womb looking for strippers, I don't think it's necessary. RFK Jr revealed this”

“Maybe this is something I've known for a really long time. However, now they're gonna dig deeper into it. And as a mom of a child on the autism spectrum who I guess it could have come from the hepatitis B, but It happened at 18 months after his MMR. The fact that this stuff is actually getting looked into is absolutely incredible. It's something I've been fighting for, for nine years.

And when, not if, when they find the link, there's going to be a lot of lawsuits.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113
Works for me.



Robert F Kennedy Jr announces ALL research and data will be published and released to the public so you can make up your own mind instead of “trusting the experts”

- We're gonna publish our protocols in advance
- We're going to tell people what we're doing
- We're gonna use data and we're gonna publish the peer reviews, which is never published by CDC studies
- We're gonna publish anytime that we can the raw data, and then we're gonna require replication of every study, which never happens at NIH now

That's something new that we're bringing in, is that every study will be replicated”

“We're gonna give people gold standard science.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113
Heartbreaking.



Mr. President,

I am writing to you as a paramedic who has worked day after day in the field, responding to emergencies where people’s lives hang in the balance. I don’t sit behind a desk and I don’t deal in theories, I deal in blood, broken bodies, and human reality.
That reality is why I cannot ignore what I personally witnessed, a 12‑year‑old girl who suffered a stroke shortly after receiving her Covid shot. Pfizer.
This was not propaganda, not a story I read online, it was in front of me, a child with a medical catastrophe that should never have happened.
You have recently called on Pfizer, Moderna, and the CDC to release the full data on these drugs. That demand is not only right, but it is long overdue. The public is fed “safe and effective” slogans, those of us on the medical front lines see the injuries, the side effects, and the tragedies that get swept under the rug. Families are left in the dark, told it’s a coincidence, and pressured into silence.
The drug companies parade “miracle” statistics in press releases, but they never release the raw truth. Why not? If their products are the lifesaving breakthroughs they claim, then full transparency would vindicate them. And if their products cause widespread harm, then the public deserves… no, the public is owed, nothing less than honesty.
Mr. President, Operation Warp Speed was hailed as a triumph. If it truly was, Americans should see the proof unfiltered not curated charts, not spin, not sanitized reports. And if it wasn’t, the families who lost sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, deserve accountability.
On the ground, I’ve seen too much to let this slide into bureaucratic silence. Hidden data doesn’t save lives, truth does. I am asking you directly to please-

Demand that Pfizer, Moderna, and others release the full clinical trial data, adverse event reports, and internal communications.
Compel the CDC to stop hiding behind vague reassurances and publish all raw numbers.
Give the American people what they were promised… the truth.
The debate must end. The secrecy must end. What I witnessed in that 12‑year‑old’s case is just one story, but there are thousands upon thousands more out there unreported. Lives have been destroyed. The American people deserve closure.
I urge you, don’t let corporate interests or captured regulators bury this any longer.

With sincere urgency,

Harry Fisher
Paramedic
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113
Yes. He invented mrna and is an expert and we know you say to listen to them.
He is a verified, non-credible quack and a laughing stock.

"Robert Malone did not invent mRNA. mRNA, or messenger RNA, is a naturally occurring molecule in cells, discovered in 1961 by Sydney Brenner, François Jacob, and Matthew Meselson. Malone, a physician and scientist, contributed to early research on mRNA technology in the late 1980s, particularly in developing methods for mRNA transfection into cells, which helped lay groundwork for mRNA vaccines. His work at the Salk Institute and Vical, alongside colleagues like Philip Felgner, involved using cationic lipids to deliver mRNA into cells, as described in papers from 1989-1990. However, many scientists, including Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman, who later refined mRNA for vaccine use, played critical roles in advancing the technology. Malone’s contributions were significant but part of a broader, collaborative effort over decades. Claiming he "invented" mRNA or mRNA vaccines oversimplifies the history and ignores the work of others."

 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,565
31,180
113
He is a verified, non-credible quack and a laughing stock.

"Robert Malone did not invent mRNA. mRNA, or messenger RNA, is a naturally occurring molecule in cells, discovered in 1961 by Sydney Brenner, François Jacob, and Matthew Meselson. Malone, a physician and scientist, contributed to early research on mRNA technology in the late 1980s, particularly in developing methods for mRNA transfection into cells, which helped lay groundwork for mRNA vaccines. His work at the Salk Institute and Vical, alongside colleagues like Philip Felgner, involved using cationic lipids to deliver mRNA into cells, as described in papers from 1989-1990. However, many scientists, including Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman, who later refined mRNA for vaccine use, played critical roles in advancing the technology. Malone’s contributions were significant but part of a broader, collaborative effort over decades. Claiming he "invented" mRNA or mRNA vaccines oversimplifies the history and ignores the work of others."

Dpic can't handle reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
72,705
18,708
113

My wife is a social worker. I actually questioned this during our delivery of our first and she stated: They mandate this because of all the cracked out mom's out there having drug addicted babies while they themselves have STD's. We never really understood why they couldn't just test the mom. Anywho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
3,736
2,725
113
I've explained on detail many times in the past. If you really want to know *I'll be glad to share.

The TLDR version is a change to how it's diagnosed and the combining of previously separated conditions such as Asperger's which are all now included under Autism Spectrum Disorder.
yoshi, with all due respect for your knowledge on this situation, It would really be better for one of the government agencies. There is a reason for the increase in cases of autism, and we don't know it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113
yoshi, with all due respect for your knowledge on this situation, It would really be better for one of the government agencies. There is a reason for the increase in cases of autism, and we don't know it.
I disagree that it would be better left to health agencies in THIS government. The quack-a-doodle heading all of our health agencies has made an uneducated decision about autism and is searching for evidence that will make him right and we all know that will somehow/some way, lead back to vaccines, whether it's true or not. I would respect the knowledge yoshi's wife has gained with many years of experience over anything that comes out of this anti-truth administration.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,832
19,875
113
My wife is a social worker. I actually questioned this during our delivery of our first and she stated: They mandate this because of all the cracked out mom's out there having drug addicted babies while they themselves have STD's. We never really understood why they couldn't just test the mom. Anywho.
That might be helpful unless she's already passed the virus to the child before she's been tested. All I know is the majority of doctors agree that this vaccine is important.
 

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,525
21,291
113
yoshi, with all due respect for your knowledge on this situation, It would really be better for one of the government agencies. There is a reason for the increase in cases of autism, and we don't know it.

There are reasons in the increase of diagnosis. There isn't a large increase in actual autism. This really isn't the forum for this, but I have shared multiple articles by the American Autism foundation explaining the rate increase.
 

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,525
21,291
113


Shocker. Kennedy continues to spread complete ********

While some short-term observation periods may have been used, no hepatitis drug was approved based on a safety study of only four days. The claim likely originated from a 1999 statement by a vaccine advocacy group regarding early studies of the hepatitis B vaccine. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Here's what the evidence shows:

• Hepatitis B vaccine claim: In 1999, the National Vaccine Information Center claimed that some hepatitis B vaccine safety studies monitored children for only four or five days. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has since stated that extensive case series reviews found no serious health problems linked to the vaccine in newborns.
• Actual drug safety trials: Hepatitis drugs and vaccines undergo extensive, multi-phase testing that can span years before and after approval. Even initial, early-phase studies are longer than four days.

• Clinical trial examples: One Phase 1 study for an investigational hepatitis C treatment administered the drug over four days, but this was only to evaluate immediate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics, not to determine overall safety for market approval. A different study for a chronic hepatitis B treatment ran for 28 days to assess safety and efficacy.
• Post-market monitoring: After a drug is approved, long-term safety is continuously monitored. For example, the FDA warned about the risk of hepatitis B reactivation in patients treated with certain direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medicines for hepatitis C, years after their approval. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7]

It is also important to note that the distinction between a vaccine and a drug is critical, as they undergo different types of studies and have different mechanisms of action. [8, 9, 10]
Are you looking for specific information about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine, or are you interested in how drug and vaccine safety studies are conducted more broadly?. [1, 7]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://stateline.org/1999/06/01/critics-question-safety-of-hepatitis-b-vaccine/[2] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/hepatitis-b.html[3] https://journals.lww.com/hep/fulltext/2025/03000/effectiveness_and_safety_of.26.aspx[4] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1528433614Z.0000000011[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168827814008010[6] https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00401947?term=0137171&viewType=Table&checkSpell&rank=1[7] https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe...titis-b-reactivating-some-patients-treated[8] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136221000188[9] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8429513/[10] https://healthsciences.uonbi.ac.ke/latest-news/prof-jaoko-debunks-covid-19
-vaccine-myths
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,525
21,291
113
Do any MAGAS actually care for truth from their leaders? My God this dude is such a charlatan and quack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
3,736
2,725
113
Do any MAGAS actually care for truth from their leaders? My God this dude is such a charlatan and quack.
conservative here..and my opinion for what it's worth is that people don't know what the truth is anymore. Our leaders manipulate the data to support their positions - that's both sides by the way. I can still see Mayorkis telling us the border is secured as millions crossed illegally......I personally don't know if Kennedy is full of it or not. One thing I'm pretty sure of is that even if he is 100% right, democrats will tell the American people that he is 100% wrong. And, I'm pretty sure that Chuck Schumer calling for kennedy's head, doesn't have the foggiest idea of anything doing with vaccines or CDC staffing. Cynical position I know, but right now I have a hard time putting trust/confidence in members of either party
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls