It is apparent you went to Trinity because reading comprehension is not your strong suit. You clearly stated Trinity has been dominate in football the last 25 years. Wrong. Trinity has been dominate since 2010. The prior 15 years X had the edge. Those are the facts.
Trinity has won exactly one state title in basketball. They are no state power. So Trinity hangs everything on football. If you can't grasp X is the far superior sports program and frankly, far superior high school including academics and facilities, that's your problem.
Of course, your reading comprehension rivals the other poster. I clearly answered his claim Trinity has been dominant the past 25 years. Trinity has clearly been dominant since 2010. It wasn't a sliding scale- it was his assertion. So I suggest you have someone google the results of the past 25 years for your benefit. Once again, all you can argue is football because you know Trinity pales in every other facet to X.
Ha, that's an interesting interpretation.
You know you are a clown and have lost the argument when you make silly statements such as this one.
Clearly, you fell in the category of those with a learning disability after reading your drivel in this thread.
Ignoring the ad hominem attack, I said St. X dominated between the Brohms. There was a stretch in the 90s when St. X won 7 of 8, including the 1997 state championship game. It was to this stretch that I was generally referring (also generally the only period of my life when I've followed or cared much about Louisville Catholic High School football). I'm aware that Trinity has the better of St. X overall. I'm also aware Trinity won state in 1994 over the Shaun Alexander Boone Co team (I was there, pulling for Trinity).
That is just dumb, Lecter. Trinity has an advantage in that it has kids who have parents that care and are involved. Public schools have all the rest of the kids, many of whom are not academically eligible. Go look at the numbers at each grade level at the public schools. The senior classes are often half the size of the freshman class. Many don't have support. My son played with a player who missed practice time because he had to work to support his grandparents who were raising him.
I like this Super Conference concept. You would need a workable plan for populating it, and ultimately repopulating it annually based on some sort of performance criteria. It could not have a static membership.
You don't get it. You are still refusing to acknowledge the disadvantages that large public schools have. This is your arrogance showing through again. I think I'm putting you on ignore because you are the type that will never change. You are the reason I'm glad that the parents of the Bryan Station players sang "Hey, hey, good bye" and the Trinity fans were muttering about Lexington Central, a clearly racist slur that I had no trouble picking up. The smugness and arrogance of the Trinity fans was thick that night.
You don't think coaches try to recruit a kid to stay in their public school system? I don't think it should be considered a big deal if a private school coach tries to talk a kid into going to their school. After all, there are a lot of advantages to a private school and it's up to the family to make that decision. It's a problem if the recruiting looks more like college recruiting with free gifts and payment and all of those things.
The public school folks always complain that the private schools are recruiting and taking their athletes. Well, the public schools have those kids in their school system (usually) at an early age and have years to convince the student that their school is the best spot for them. Private schools doing the same thing shouldn't upset anyone. I don't think it's a huge deal UNLESS we're talking about improper benefits and gifts and those things.
