We beat 2 interim coaches and 1 coach that got canned

Status
Not open for further replies.

RAC93

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2023
2,613
4,351
113
Call it what you wish, but you seem to be bound and determined to paint Rutgers' 2023 season as negative as you can.
Why ?

I can be as negative as the next guy when it comes to RU sports, but painting the past season with a negative brush is too much. The season was an overall positive. What were people expecting, a 9-3 record??? C’mon now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3 and csphi

JerseyNoles

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2021
2,844
2,425
3
I get it, but the benchmark this year was bowl or bust

I don't like how we finished the year, and certainly don't like the way GS coaches & limits the offense, but he got us to 6 wins regardless

Next up is beating UM in the bowl game, continuing recruiting at a high level, using the portal, building the fieldhouse and raising funds for NIL

As much as the man frustrates me at times, Greg got us to a bowl game and has the program seemingly on the rise
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,575
15,553
113
Fact Rutgers is going bowling .
A sad fact is: some(so:called) RU fans are trying to make it look like Rutgers doesn't deserve to be in a bowl game.
Rutgers 6 loses were to teams going bowling ( 3 loses were to top 10 programs).
Yet the bashers try to act like all tge teams Rutgers played in 2023 were cupcakes and a COY whose team lost to Rutgers shouldn't be considered a good coach.
Another team that Rutgers beat (VT) was made to look like a cupcake, even though it is bowl bound.
It's a shame some try to make names for themselves on TKR by putting RU down.
Between them and the trolls that infest this board, everything Greg Schiano accomplishes is not good enough and it seems like losing is what they want more than wins so they can go on knocking Rutgers football and implying Rutgers will always be a loser and refusing to acknowledge any improvement the RU FB program shows.

Rutgers is going bowling and it's the second bowl apperence in the for years of the G2 era.
The RU fan trolls can act like borh bowls are undersebed, but just beng invited makes the ru fantrolls wrong about both the Gator 2 years ago and this upcoming Pinstrip apperance being underseved.
Rutgers earned the Gator because of academics, but they way the team omproved enough to have a W-L record to qualify under the rules that year makes the RU FB program worthy of going bowling.
Just like Rutgers earned the pinstripe this year because of it's W-L record

>Rutgers had the second-toughest strength of schedule (SOS) in the nation this season. And among the top four teams in the nation in terms of SOS, Rutgers was the only one to not have a losing record and to make a bowl game.<

So the haters are wrong when implying Rutgers didn't earn it.
Just like they wll be wrong to imply next year's team will be a loser.
RU in 2024 will go bowling again and disapoint the rutrolls along with trolls from other Rival boards.
With the resident TKR trolls, this board doesn't need trolls from other boards comming to TKR to put RU down, this board has home grown " talent" that put Rutgers down evey chance they get.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Revisionist Theory… like decolonization… or Jesus ‘s birthplace made him a Palestinian . People are heading down the wrong road thinking they’ll be safe in a NWO.Good luck folks you’ll need it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,255
0
Kind of lame facts. We could denigrate a lot of team's losses that way. Most everybody plays 1 or 2 cupcakes.
We could argue we put the nail in Allen's coffin. He is a perfect example why you don't extend based on one year of success because "everybody else is doing it."
We beat 2 teams who made bowls. Plum is a troll and j .off. why post that bullshyt unless you are an ***.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thegock and csphi

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,560
37,203
113
We were lucky to play Northwestern early in the season. Probably wouldn't be bowl eligible if we played them latter.
Then again- maybe if we played PSU/OSU or Iowa earlier- we could have finished strong ourselves...We still would have lost those games but would not have all been bunched at the end.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,063
18,415
113
Then again- maybe if we played PSU/OSU or Iowa earlier- we could have finished strong ourselves...We still would have lost those games but would not have all been bunched at the end.

And Maryland after murderers row.
 

jsol_05

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2005
4,870
2,583
113
Kind of lame facts. We could denigrate a lot of team's losses that way. Most everybody plays 1 or 2 cupcakes.
We could argue we put the nail in Allen's coffin. He is a perfect example why you don't extend based on one year of success because "everybody else is doing it."
Did we just extend a coach who hasn’t put up a winning record. He could after the next game but when we extended he hadnt
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Call it what you wish, but you seem to be bound and determined to paint Rutgers' 2023 season as negative as you can.
Why ?
We beat 2 teams who made bowls. Plum is a troll and j .off. why post that bullshyt unless you are an ***.

If he wasn't an *** he wouldn't post that bs on Christmas day.
Because they are miserable with their own lives

Wow, what interesting posts on Christmas Day that you all dug up . Who is the loser ?
You guys must not have lives to do this on a national holiday !!
Losers!
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,575
15,553
113
Wow, what interesting posts on Christmas Day that you all dug up . Who is the loser ?
You guys must not have lives to do this on a national holiday !!
Losers!
That, I might say , is what Christmas is all about.
After being called an ***, don't turn the other cheek 😇
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,187
35,115
113
Don't post facts. Plum and 95 will call you names.
no one needs to call you a name after resurrecting a thread a month later after it was dead in addition to bringing someone in..cough cough...that wasn't even in it. You made yourself look foolish all by yourself. What is worse is you did it on Christmas looking even more the loser and fool

then a bunch of other fools jumped in not realizing what you did to them

great job sport, carry on
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,187
35,115
113
Wow, what interesting posts on Christmas Day that you all dug up . Who is the loser ?
You guys must not have lives to do this on a national holiday !!
Losers!
I used to think the lack of critical thinking was the biggest issue facing the board but it's clear it's emotional maturity
 

Kbee3

Heisman
Aug 23, 2002
43,724
35,255
0
Wow, what interesting posts on Christmas Day that you all dug up . Who is the loser ?
You guys must not have lives to do this on a national holiday !!
Losers!
Not really much digging involved.
Actually I'm just puzzled by the negativity of Rutgers fans about where the program currently sits.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,560
37,203
113
Not really much digging involved.
Actually I'm just puzzled by the negativity of Rutgers fans about where the program currently sits.
This is what gets me as well. We did better than anyone expected. And let’s be honest- to even bring up these 3 wins regardless of when and who did.
NWU/MSU/Ind- all sucked in 2022 with their previous coaches too…
And yet- our O/U was around 4 wins and so many fans still thought the under. Same goes for VaTech as well.
So- this fired/getting fired/etc- are non factors
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3 and csphi

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
I
This is what gets me as well. We did better than anyone expected. And let’s be honest- to even bring up these 3 wins regardless of when and who did.
NWU/MSU/Ind- all sucked in 2022 with their previous coaches too…
And yet- our O/U was around 4 wins and so many fans still thought the under. Same goes for VaTech as well.
So- this fired/getting fired/etc- are non factors
As someone just posted above… it’s Rutgers so no matter how we do we gotta tell the world we suck….gotta love misery.
 

jsol_05

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2005
4,870
2,583
113
no one needs to call you a name after resurrecting a thread a month later after it was dead in addition to bringing someone in..cough cough...that wasn't even in it. You made yourself look foolish all by yourself. What is worse is you did it on Christmas looking even more the loser and fool

then a bunch of other fools jumped in not realizing what you did to them

great job sport, carry on
I thought this board was about a person opinion. You don’t have to agree with a person’s opinion, just dont understand the name calling
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,486
83,022
113
I thought this board was about a person opinion. You don’t have to agree with a person’s opinion, just dont understand the name calling
And we can simply respond by saying "I disagree with your opinion" instead of "You are wrong, and I am right." There are some instances where fact make one person's opinion more wrong than another's but more often than not, these are disagreements on one person's view of a situation. Newsflash--people have different opinions! And some people are generally more positive, while others are generally more negative in their views.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
I thought this board was about a person opinion. You don’t have to agree with a person’s opinion, just dont understand the name calling
Wait … your gripe is with name calling? Do you think what is on the news outlets daily is ok?…your good with the street urchins who infest the cities ? Names don ‘t physically harm … mentally perhaps… the point being I’d prefer the name calling to the physical confrontations and attacks. That old adage “ sticks and stones “ is still true years after I was a child.There is much worse going on in tv , movies. schools - colleges. high schools, grammar schools , offices. This anti name calling stance is great but it needs to be started early on in life.
 

jsol_05

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2005
4,870
2,583
113
Wait … your gripe is with name calling? Do you think what is on the news outlets daily is ok?…your good with the street urchins who infest the cities ? Names don ‘t physically harm … mentally perhaps… the point being I’d prefer the name calling to the physical confrontations and attacks. That old adage “ sticks and stones “ is still true years after I was a child.There is much worse going on in tv , movies. schools - colleges. high schools, grammar schools , offices. This anti name calling stance is great but it needs to be started early on in life.
I don’t disagree, don’t agree with the name calling (sports, politics, work). It has to start somewhere, so let us set the example😀
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
We were lucky to play Northwestern early in the season. Probably wouldn't be bowl eligible if we played them latter.
This ^^^^ Also, if we played VTech towards the end of the season might have lost that one as well. Schiano still gets credit for 6 wins, he didn't pick when to play those teams and he and the team did deliver us our Super Bowl, the fan favorite Pinstripe Bowl.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,063
18,415
113
This ^^^^ Also, if we played VTech towards the end of the season might have lost that one as well. Schiano still gets credit for 6 wins, he didn't pick when to play those teams and he and the team did deliver us our Super Bowl, the fan favorite Pinstripe Bowl.

So he shouldn't get credit for 6 wins? And of course Rutgers didn't improve one iota during the season.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,575
15,553
113
Dear Lord….
I'll add to your Dear Lord , wish RU played Ohio State the first game instead of Northwestern
played Wisconsin instead of Temple the 2nd game
leave Michigan as the 3rd game
Penn State instead of VT the 3rd game
leave Michigan as the 4th game
Iowa the 5th game , see Wagner later in year.
then after the Iowa game bring the ones bumped
After Rutgers beat them ,MSU & Indiana
they wouldn't have been down because of losses to the top B1G program
and ready to beat the Turtles and not taking a loss because of the hard games RU played leading up to the Maryland game.

If the nay-sayers can try to degrade the RU wins I can point out a better season could have happened by playing the best first and beating the others later making for a team better equipped to go 7-5.
Rutgers won the games it was supposed to and the teams that lost early just could have been losers if they played Rutgers later in the season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.