It's not the "type", it's the self identification as such. Strength is always something to be revered. Leadership is a skill and ability that does the world a lot of good. But when self identification becomes all about being the "alpha", imo, ego and self glorification can cloud the judgement of good people. Working together is better than competition for the top slot in many situations, as a former soldier I'm sure you know that more than I do. I've found a desire to lead, but I've also found that there are times when I should resign to supporting roles. A healthy self identity and confidence is good and necessary. However, ego can run wild really quick. Once it gets out of control it can be the downfall of great people. The illusion of never being vulnerable or in need of support is dangerous. I think the greatest leaders in history realized this, and most had source of strength from someone outside themselves. It helps if we recognize this, and not pretend that men are divided into 2 categories only. I've led, and I've followed, and found peace in both decisions.
I've also had situations where I've led and regretted it, and when I've followed and regretted it. Balance is key. And communication is easier when egos don't get in the way.
IMO - you asked