Wins lead

Big glove 23

Redshirt
Mar 18, 2013
49
28
0
Anyone concerned about the all time wins lead? In the 8 years Since Cal has been here. We have been to 4 final fours and two of the best seasons. We've ever had at 38-2 and 38-1. The record for most wins in a season. But we haven't really added much space between us and Kansas. Anyone concerned other than me. That we can have a run like that. And not create a bigger gap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

WildMoon

Heisman
Apr 7, 2009
78,693
11,120
0
All time wins is about consistency between generations of coaches.

As long as Coach Cal wins at high rate, it's not a big deal. Which he has been. I think Self has caught up 1 win since Coach Cal has been here (not counting this year). He's been pretty consistent.

The reality is, Coach Cal actually increased the spread between us and second place. UNC was much closer than what Kansas is to us now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKUGA and Panthur

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,975
13,972
113
I like being the all time wins leader too, that puts us over the top when talking about other programs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Panthur
Nov 12, 2014
4,807
11,637
0
Shouldn't be worrying about this at all. To open up any kind of lead that would seem "comfortable", we'd have to win 30 every year and Kansas only win 20 total in the same year for 5 years in a row to even open 50 games lead....not likely.
 

KDCats11

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2008
19,756
3,237
113
What's there to be concerned about? I can understand concern if it were closing, but it's not.
 

RoyKent

Heisman
Feb 3, 2015
23,016
33,287
66
The all time wins lead is a big deal in my opinion.

Feels like it should have grown during the Cal era. Really surprised it hasn't. But, KU has been really successful as well during this same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry
Jul 18, 2001
4,771
117
0
Anyone concerned about the all time wins lead? In the 8 years Since Cal has been here. We have been to 4 final fours and two of the best seasons. We've ever had at 38-2 and 38-1. The record for most wins in a season. But we haven't really added much space between us and Kansas. Anyone concerned other than me. That we can have a run like that. And not create a bigger gap.

I think UK will add some games next year. KU is losing Jackson, Mason and Lucas and may also lose Graham as well. IK KU does not get Duval it will not have a great team.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
The all time wins lead is a big deal in my opinion.

Feels like it should have grown during the Cal era. Really surprised it hasn't. But, KU has been really successful as well during this same time.

KU wins a lot of games...they don't do much when it matters but they win a ton. Consistent.
 

lkc1021

All-Conference
Apr 12, 2007
6,985
1,650
0
Anyone concerned about the all time wins lead? In the 8 years Since Cal has been here. We have been to 4 final fours and two of the best seasons. We've ever had at 38-2 and 38-1. The record for most wins in a season. But we haven't really added much space between us and Kansas. Anyone concerned other than me. That we can have a run like that. And not create a bigger gap.
Who cares?
 

kyboy1998_rivals34276

All-American
Mar 20, 2006
9,339
8,773
61
I said years ago on this board, to a chorus of boos, that Kansas would eventually catch and surpass us in wins. They were third at the time. I still firmly believe they will. Especially after Cal is gone and we chew through coaches for a while. I imagine we'll drop to third for a stretch.

Kentucky and UNC have higher highs, but can reach lower lows. Kansas just keeps plugging along and doing Kansas things. For most part they always have.
 

65pacecar

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2014
1,562
2,009
81
I think it is a big deal and glad UK is the leader, I wish we could build a larger lead on them. I really hated it when UNC was the leader for a while. Also cool that UK was the first to 2000 wins.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
My biggest concern is an hourly worker at a burrito factory retroactively looking at paper clippings and deciding that Kansas should have had more wins . Something that legit would be counted , would be just like our real wins .
 

SpartanState

Senior
Feb 3, 2011
11,054
663
0
I think UK will add some games next year. KU is losing Jackson, Mason and Lucas and may also lose Graham as well. IK KU does not get Duval it will not have a great team.

KU isn't losing Graham. Graham has to prove he can play point to make the league. And without Mason the point is all Graham's.

Azubuike was starting over Lucas before he got hurt. So, a healthy Azubuike > Lucas.

Self has said Malik Newman has been the best player in practice. Newman, and perhaps Duvall, should more than replace Mason's scoring.

Jackson will be a loss for the Jayhawks. But Bragg it appears has begun to put it together the last few games after a slow start. An improved Bragg, Billy Preston, and a healthy Colbey should very well be able to compensate for the loss of JJ.

KU also has top 40 recruits Marcus Garrett and Sam Cunliffe coming in. And Vick has become quite the player the last few weeks. And even if Self doesn't get Duvall (50/50 according to Evan Daniels), Mark Smith is very high on the Hawks and Tilmon maybe available should Groce get canned. Tilmon had KU in his top 3 before choosing Illinois.

So, KU could very well be better next year.
 

JPScott

All-American
Sep 16, 2001
7,689
7,427
62
I said years ago on this board, to a chorus of boos, that Kansas would eventually catch and surpass us in wins. They were third at the time. I still firmly believe they will. Especially after Cal is gone and we chew through coaches for a while. I imagine we'll drop to third for a stretch.

Kentucky and UNC have higher highs, but can reach lower lows. Kansas just keeps plugging along and doing Kansas things. For most part they always have.

If you're talking the last 15-20 years then Kansas has been winning at a slightly higher percentage than UK. But overall UK has been more consistent. Pretty much since the early 1930's UK has been between 70 - 80+ win%. The only real exception was in the late 40s/early 50's when they got up to 90+ win%.

 

king of cali

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2005
6,955
3,877
0
You should be concerned if the lead was decreasing. But it is really just holding steady because while UK has been on a tremendous run, KU has also been winning a lot of games. They have won 30 games or more in5 different seasons, and should do it again this season.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
If you're talking the last 15-20 years then Kansas has been winning at a slightly higher percentage than UK. But overall UK has been more consistent. Pretty much since the early 1930's UK has been between 70 - 80+ win%. The only real exception was in the late 40s/early 50's when they got up to 90+ win%.

Looks like every team benefited in the last 15 to 20 years from the Tubby/BCG era , except Indiana [laughing]
 

kyboy1998_rivals34276

All-American
Mar 20, 2006
9,339
8,773
61
If you're talking the last 15-20 years then Kansas has been winning at a slightly higher percentage than UK. But overall UK has been more consistent. Pretty much since the early 1930's UK has been between 70 - 80+ win%. The only real exception was in the late 40s/early 50's when they got up to 90+ win%.

I always respect your opinion and appreciate the data you bring. You're one of my favorite resources we have honestly.

I just think the modern version of us moving forward will be more like the last 30. I doubt we get a 42 year run with a great coach again. I think we will eat up coaches between great ones and Kansas will sneak up.

Hopefully I'm wrong. I just think it will happen.
 

JPScott

All-American
Sep 16, 2001
7,689
7,427
62
I always respect your opinion and appreciate the data you bring. You're one of my favorite resources we have honestly.

I just think the modern version of us moving forward will be more like the last 30. I doubt we get a 42 year run with a great coach again. I think we will eat up coaches between great ones and Kansas will sneak up.

Hopefully I'm wrong. I just think it will happen.

All I can say is that despite what many UK fans may think, the all-time wins list is not something that UK owns. There's been a number of teams through the years which have held the record.

Kentucky has become the leader and lost it, and regained it back. That will likely happen in the future as well.

For those who are interested in seeing which teams have held the all-time wins record at various times in history, they can check the following link which shows the leaders on a decade-by-decade basis.

Link to All-Time Wins history
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guess Who

WildMoon

Heisman
Apr 7, 2009
78,693
11,120
0
I always respect your opinion and appreciate the data you bring. You're one of my favorite resources we have honestly.

I just think the modern version of us moving forward will be more like the last 30. I doubt we get a 42 year run with a great coach again. I think we will eat up coaches between great ones and Kansas will sneak up.

Hopefully I'm wrong. I just think it will happen.

this is completely random and terrible take. Nice job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: new era cat

Kizzy

Senior
Dec 29, 2015
1,747
576
0
I'm not really concerned. Kansas aims for conference championships while we aim for final fours and national championships.
That makes zero sense. I'm very sure they aim for national title's. Strange post.
 

Montana81

Heisman
Aug 12, 2004
82,726
29,410
113
Eventually Kansas will make a bad hire again and have to watch us either re pass them or stretch the lead like we had to watch others catch up to us during the tubby years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lonnie boyd

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,723
101,066
113
The all time wins lead is a big deal in my opinion.

Feels like it should have grown during the Cal era. Really surprised it hasn't. But, KU has been really successful as well during this same time.

Cal is winning about 31 games/year since he's been here, with a brand new team every season. Kansas returns most of their veterans each years, and often sprinkles in guys like Wiggins, Jackson, etc. I'm surprised Kansas isn't closer, to be completely honest.

Was Calipari supposed to average 34-35 wins/season with a brand new team of freshmen each year?
 

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,723
101,066
113
Eventually Kansas will make a bad hire again and have to watch us either re pass them or stretch the lead like we had to watch others catch up to us during the tubby years.

Self is only 54 years old. He's going to be there for a while.

If any of us are still biting our finger nails about the all-time wins list when Self finally hangs 'em up, we might consider other life pursuits for a bit.
 

preacherfan

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2003
29,123
4,836
113
Anyone concerned about the all time wins lead? In the 8 years Since Cal has been here. We have been to 4 final fours and two of the best seasons. We've ever had at 38-2 and 38-1. The record for most wins in a season. But we haven't really added much space between us and Kansas. Anyone concerned other than me. That we can have a run like that. And not create a bigger gap.

This is the reason why some of us do look at post count. Someone with 33 posts starting a thread like this is probably trolling. Even if not, I have a bigger concern today with trying to figure out what I am going to order at Mac's Cafe for breakfast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lonnie boyd

DelkBowl

Heisman
Oct 4, 2015
10,805
11,876
101
I'm terrified. I cant work. I can't eat (wait scratch that one), I can't sleep. I'm drinking everyday (no changes there). I guess i'm okay with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Panthur

railroadkat_1

Heisman
Mar 9, 2008
4,328
11,230
0
KU isn't losing Graham. Graham has to prove he can play point to make the league. And without Mason the point is all Graham's.

Azubuike was starting over Lucas before he got hurt. So, a healthy Azubuike > Lucas.

Self has said Malik Newman has been the best player in practice. Newman, and perhaps Duvall, should more than replace Mason's scoring.

Jackson will be a loss for the Jayhawks. But Bragg it appears has begun to put it together the last few games after a slow start. An improved Bragg, Billy Preston, and a healthy Colbey should very well be able to compensate for the loss of JJ.

KU also has top 40 recruits Marcus Garrett and Sam Cunliffe coming in. And Vick has become quite the player the last few weeks. And even if Self doesn't get Duvall (50/50 according to Evan Daniels), Mark Smith is very high on the Hawks and Tilmon maybe available should Groce get canned. Tilmon had KU in his top 3 before choosing Illinois.

So, KU could very well be better next year.


No way no how! What about Miles Bridges? Can Izzo talk him into staying another year? I say no!
 

Nubb16

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
128,718
10,043
67
Win the SEC tournament and we will have gained a game on them this year so far. Do people expect to blow them away in total wins in just a few years?
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
33,005
34,612
113
I think UK will add some games next year. KU is losing Jackson, Mason and Lucas and may also lose Graham as well. IK KU does not get Duval it will not have a great team.
.
They'll have Newman, Svi, Preston, Bragg, and Azubuike with Vick being a 6th man.... thats all i know of who will be on their team but thats a top 15 team at worst and yet another Big 12 title.

everyone on this board like to say next year UNC, Duke, UL, and KU will be down........ and how often does it happen? People need to learn the lesson that great coaches find ways to win.
 

kyboy1998_rivals34276

All-American
Mar 20, 2006
9,339
8,773
61
"I said years ago on this board, to a chorus of boos, that Kansas would eventually catch and surpass us in wins."

Yes, you did say that. Years ago. And all these years later, Kentucky's lead is virtually intact -- in fact, bigger than it was when you started saying this.
Screenshot it and save it. Revisit it within 3 years after Cals departure.
 

KentuckyFlyer

All-Conference
Jan 25, 2007
3,620
1,506
113
Cal is winning about 31 games/year since he's been here, with a brand new team every season. Kansas returns most of their veterans each years, and often sprinkles in guys like Wiggins, Jackson, etc. I'm surprised Kansas isn't closer, to be completely honest.

Was Calipari supposed to average 34-35 wins/season with a brand new team of freshmen each year?
Actually yeah.. with the freshman he gets every year I think we all thought that in the beginning.
 
Jul 9, 2004
93,075
38,060
0
The Big 12, despite the smoke talking heads blow up our butts every season, is pretty much overrated every year. That conference is barely better than the SEC, and it's been that way for a while now. It will be easy for them to stay close because of that.

Outside of KU and last year with Buddy Hield, who has really truly been a threat to win it all from that conference other than KU. Nobody. 2 of 3 times in past 11 years where Florida has been a title contender they won it all. The 3rd time, ended when Florida lost in the Final Four to eventual champ UConn. The last non -KU Final Four team other than OU, I believe was in 03 or 04 and it was OK. St.
 

TroutBum

All-Conference
Nov 4, 2014
1,924
2,933
67
I don't see how kansas didn't have to forfeit some of their wins from a couple of years ago when they sat an ineligible player after having played him part of the year!
 
Dec 12, 2007
68,157
14,860
0
.
They'll have Newman, Svi, Preston, Bragg, and Azubuike with Vick being a 6th man.... thats all i know of who will be on their team but thats a top 15 team at worst and yet another Big 12 title.

everyone on this board like to say next year UNC, Duke, UL, and KU will be down........ and how often does it happen? People need to learn the lesson that great coaches find ways to win.

Chokehawk fans have said Svi is not coming back.