Has 19 recruits, with only 1 4star and one 2 star, the rest 3s. Development?
Yes, but did the 2* attend a rivals or scout sponsored camp?Has 19 recruits, with only 1 4star and one 2 star, the rest 3s. Development?
No it's obvious they have more talent in that state then in lincoln for their core players they avg 15 division one players a year to Nebraska 4 And players from Wisconsin are usually snubbed in rivals ratings. In Wisconsin case there classes are always under ranked by rivals Wisconsin also has the number one ranked walkon program in the country due too them having more talent in Wisconsin.It is pretty obvious that Wisconsin is more worried about winning the actual “game” on the scoreboard...not winning at subjective recruiting rankings. Wish Nebraska would do the same.![]()
No it's obvious they have more talent in that state then in lincoln for their core players they avg 15 division one players a year to Nebraska 4 And players from Wisconsin are usually snubbed in rivals ratings. In Wisconsin case there classes are always under ranked by rivals Wisconsin also has the number one ranked walkon program in the country due too them having more talent in Wisconsin.
Wisconsin does a much better job of developing their "under ranked" talent than Nebraska does.
As far as Wisconsin having more talent in the state than Nebraska...I didn't hear Nebraska fans complaining about this issue from the late 1960's-2001.
Iowa and Minn are offering more of the kids we usually get as walk ons.No it's obvious they have more talent in that state then in lincoln for their core players they avg 15 division one players a year to Nebraska 4 And players from Wisconsin are usually snubbed in rivals ratings. In Wisconsin case there classes are always under ranked by rivals Wisconsin also has the number one ranked walkon program in the country due too them having more talent in Wisconsin.