I know this may sound crazy, but we may have won by losing Smothers. If he had stayed, who would we have lost? We lost Brown to Texas because of Smothers.
In two years Smothers has been at Oklahoma, NC State, Alabama and now Texas. Did anyone notice that Oklahoma did not try to get Smothers back. In the portal, it is not about who you get, it is about what do you get with them. I am not saying that Smothers would have been a cancer, but a locker room is about more than money. There is a reason DeBoer did not try to stop Smothers from going to Austin. I do not know the reason; however, I do know that $2 million will help us get linemen that we Really need. We have adequate running backs.
43 Replies
Josh_Davis96
Jan 14, 5:46 PM
Vaughnbama said:$2 million for a RB?? I hope not šI know this may sound crazy, but we may have won by losing Smothers. If he had stayed, who would we have lost? We lost Brown to Texas because of Smothers. In two years Smothers has been at Oklahoma, NC State, Alabama and now Texas. Did anyone notice that Oklahoma did not try to get Smothers back. In the portal, it is not about who you get, it is about what do you get with them. I am not saying that Smothers would have been a cancer, but a locker room is about more than money. There is a reason DeBoer did not try to stop Smothers from going to Austin. I do not know the reason; however, I do know that $2 million will help us get linemen that we Really need. We have adequate running backs.
TheRealJCB206
Jan 14, 5:54 PM
Josh_Davis96 said:Yeah, hadnāt seen that number. That canāt possibly be true.$2 million for a RB?? I hope not š
Bd2003
Jan 14, 6:04 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:I think i seen where UT paid close to that to steal him away.Yeah, hadnāt seen that number. That canāt possibly be true.
Villedaddy502
Jan 14, 6:05 PM
Feels like a Barner thread š
holythor
Jan 14, 6:10 PM
Vaughnbama said:We still wanted smothers even after the texas visit. He was our first guy in the portal, a top priority. Dont cope, it was a loss. We got beat it is what it is tho move on.I know this may sound crazy, but we may have won by losing Smothers. If he had stayed, who would we have lost? We lost Brown to Texas because of Smothers. In two years Smothers has been at Oklahoma, NC State, Alabama and now Texas. Did anyone notice that Oklahoma did not try to get Smothers back. In the portal, it is not about who you get, it is about what do you get with them. I am not saying that Smothers would have been a cancer, but a locker room is about more than money. There is a reason DeBoer did not try to stop Smothers from going to Austin. I do not know the reason; however, I do know that $2 million will help us get linemen that we Really need. We have adequate running backs.
TomJames1978
Jan 14, 6:19 PM
holythor said:He wasnāt a priority. He was an opportunity. He contacted us and it didnāt work out - had a messy way of not working out, but thatās still all it was.We still wanted smothers even after the texas visit. He was our first guy in the portal, a top priority. Dont cope, it was a loss. We got beat it is what it is tho move on.
holythor
Jan 14, 6:29 PM
TomJames1978 said:he was the first player we targeted in the portal and we offered him significant money. thats called a priority, regardless of how you want to cope about it. we move on thoHe wasnāt a priority. He was an opportunity. He contacted us and it didnāt work out - had a messy way of not working out, but thatās still all it was.
Southbay04
Jan 14, 6:29 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:Its what Haynes just got from GT allegedly...so I wouldn't be surprised tbhYeah, hadnāt seen that number. That canāt possibly be true.
MTAQ
Jan 14, 6:31 PM
I really don't get the gnashing over Smothers. My only regret is the loss of the Hollywood x2 jokes.
TomJames1978
Jan 14, 6:32 PM
holythor said:Thatās the thing. We didnāt target him. He targeted us.he was the first player we targeted in the portal and we offered him significant money. thats called a priority, regardless of how you want to cope about it. we move on tho
holythor
Jan 14, 6:35 PM
TomJames1978 said:wtf are you talking about dude.Thatās the thing. We didnāt target him. He targeted us.
Gibber71
Jan 14, 6:36 PM
We obviously wanted him and were aggressive in trying to get him to come here.
He showed his character and I don't believe he would have put the team goals ahead of his own.
We tried to get him and lost, but it might end up being a good thing. Both things can be true.
TheRealJCB206
Jan 14, 6:37 PM
Southbay04 said:Iām not surprised that teams are paying $2M+ for players.Its what Haynes just got from GT allegedly...so I wouldn't be surprised tbh
ABSeeyoulater
Jan 14, 6:37 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:well if we weren't low balling him like they say were weren't then around 2M would have beaten our offerYeah, hadnāt seen that number. That canāt possibly be true.
TheRealJCB206
Jan 14, 6:44 PM
ABSeeyoulater said:If you mean if we donāt hand out NIL deals like rev share?well if we weren't low balling him like they say were weren't then around 2M would have beaten our offer
ABSeeyoulater
Jan 14, 6:48 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:no Iām sayin everything that was said was that we had a very good offer on the table for him and tried to make it better. That means 1-1.5M for a RB or else we donāt know what a good offer is. So if Texas beat our offer 1.5-2M makes sense.If you mean if we donāt hand out NIL deals like rev share?
bama1055_micah_07
Jan 14, 6:53 PM
He was our top guy and we got lockered. All there is to it. It sucks but will be fine
bamaslama33
Jan 14, 6:55 PM
Vaughnbama said:Where did you hear $2 millionI know this may sound crazy, but we may have won by losing Smothers. If he had stayed, who would we have lost? We lost Brown to Texas because of Smothers. In two years Smothers has been at Oklahoma, NC State, Alabama and now Texas. Did anyone notice that Oklahoma did not try to get Smothers back. In the portal, it is not about who you get, it is about what do you get with them. I am not saying that Smothers would have been a cancer, but a locker room is about more than money. There is a reason DeBoer did not try to stop Smothers from going to Austin. I do not know the reason; however, I do know that $2 million will help us get linemen that we Really need. We have adequate running backs.

TheRealJCB206
Jan 14, 7:16 PM
ABSeeyoulater said:Iām sure we were at $1M or higher, maybe even $1.5M. Sounds like there might have been some bidding with someone else or Texas wanted to shut it down. I doubt you go back on your word for a 10% bump but who knows. Shannon described it as āFU money.ā Itās likely they were much higher. Doubt double but I could see a 50% higher offer or more.no Iām sayin everything that was said was that we had a very good offer on the table for him and tried to make it better. That means 1-1.5M for a RB or else we donāt know what a good offer is. So if Texas beat our offer 1.5-2M makes sense.
Stivcee
Jan 14, 7:16 PM
Itās always great to have a home run hitter at running back, but Iād prefer having the guys who can press the hole and an o-line that can create them.
Rammer Jammer
Jan 14, 7:20 PM
Why would a RB have been our "top guy"? That is not a position of need.
ABSeeyoulater
Jan 14, 7:20 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:thatās why Iām saying 2M actually makes sense. It was somewhere in that ball park or we really arenāt offering competitive deals which I donāt think is true.Iām sure we were at $1M or higher, maybe even $1.5M. Sounds like there might have been some bidding with someone else or Texas wanted to shut it down. I doubt you go back on your word for a 10% bump but who knows.
TheRealJCB206
Jan 14, 7:28 PM
ABSeeyoulater said:I could see if he got $2M but you think we offered $2M and they said F it and did $3M? Maybe, just seems high. Maybe one day it will be more transparent but that may hurt us more than help.thatās why Iām saying 2M actually makes sense. It was somewhere in that ball park or we really arenāt offering competitive deals which I donāt think is true.
ABSeeyoulater
Jan 14, 7:36 PM
TheRealJCB206 said:i think initially we were around 1-1.1M and Texas offered more, we matched, and they went higher than we were willing to go. Just based off what the market is and how this negotiation went my guess is we have 1-1.5M to give to a really good starting RB in the portal depending on how high we want to go. but yeah we don't know for sure because there is no transperancy in this stuff which is much needed but wont happen till there is a CBA. But I think it's fair to assume that we are offering market rates and teams are exceeding it to beat us.I could see if he got $2M but you think we offered $2M and they said F it and did $3M? Maybe, just seems high. Maybe one day it will be more transparent but that may hurt us more than help.
Thanks for checking out this free message board preview.
Join the full discussion at BOL Round Table