2 more shootings today- at Acorn State and Jackson State.

Podgy

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2022
3,579
4,089
113
Has anyone investigated those Mennonites? I know they have good bakeries but is that a way to conceal some rather sinister endeavors***
 

The Cooterpoot

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
6,852
11,956
113
Music Video Wtf GIF
 

bulldognation

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
3,713
1,360
113
I don’t know the spiritual makeup of the Pack, but personally I believe the lack of values, disregard for human life, self-worship, and general bad societal behavior can be attributed to the how much we as a culture have abandoned the Church and Christian teachings/accountability/values. We have allowed secular, anti-Biblical views to run rampant across the board and accepted that a majority of the country sees anything religious as outdated, restrictive or judgmental.
Truth is we’d all benefit from simply darkening a church door more often and actually listening to what God says about good and evil.
 

John Deaux VII

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2024
955
2,409
93
There’s a simple fix and I would be willing to pay more taxes for it ….follow the El Salvador plan. Build more jails and fill them up!!! 1% of the people cause 99% of the problems. No more deadbeat fathers, liquor store thieves, 5hitty 5hitty obese b1tches robbing Walmarts or wrecking coffee shops, and no more 30 arrest thugs stabbing wyt girls on a train
I don't know if I would call it simple, but I think this is the best solution - fund our criminal justice system the way we fund our military. More police, more courts, and more jails, no matter the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Walkthedawg

All-Conference
Oct 3, 2022
970
1,744
93
Give us a solution
I’ve got a hell of a start.

START at a 5 year sentence enhancement for any crime in which a gun was used to either intimidate or cause harm. Served day for day. No parole. No plea. No sympathy.

That’s on top of what the sentence is in the underlying crime.

That should be agreed on by people who are anti gun and pro gun.
 

Ranchdawg

All-Conference
Dec 13, 2012
4,473
3,725
113
The right to have a gun shouldn't go away.
We have limitations on what constitutes 'bear arms' right now, so limitations are clearly acceptable.

I fully agree that supportive 2 parent households are more ideal than 1 parent households, simply from a statistical results perspective.
And I fully agree that limits and expectations are important in childhood and society.

But school and public Shootings aren't new. They aren't some recent phenomenon.
We will never fully eliminate Shootings. Valuing life will reduce Shootings.
Reducing legal fire arms will reduce Shootings.

Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
There is no way to reduce the number of firearms substantially in the US without a government ban or buyback program. What does pro-life have to do with it? Mental illness is the biggest issue we have in these cases.

If we ban guns completely then knives will be next. Do we ban knives? People have driven cars into crowds. Do we ban cars? Freedom doesn't guarantee that people will live without incident.

The real issue is people with mental issues. How do we find these people and limit their ability to harm or kill others? That is the real issue and it is a tough one.
 

skip dog

Senior
Nov 15, 2005
1,127
725
93
Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
yea....NO.....why should I be punished for being responsible and accepting instruction from my Dad / Uncles / brother / Grandfather since I was 10 (44 years ago), and passing those same values on to my son? I have shot competitively, hunted all types of game, practiced, and shot just to hear "boom" my entire life. By myself and in fellowship with friends and acquaintances. I would dare to say in all my guns, and 40+ years, I have shot well over 100,000 rounds (in competition we sling some lead, and I think that is a low conservative number)

Why should I be limited to what I own? Why should a law be passed that invades my right to responsibly pursue something that I have enjoyed my entire life?

I genuinely understand why you would say this, but I also respectfully disagree that it is this mindset that further removes accountability, and responsibility from society and makes things worse. Why does the law abiding responsible citizen have to pay a price for those that can not simply abide my modest laws?

I will tell you this, I can invite you into my home, and you would never see a gun or ounce of ammo........but if you come into my home uninvited w/ ill intent, you would realize the error in your decision making process very quick............and it is that error in making decisions that should never guide a law that takes away from those that have no problem abiding in the law.
 

615dawg

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
6,633
3,592
113
If there was a simple fix we would have done it years ago. There is no fix for this that society will accept. Every person has free will to be different than those they were raised with and there are good people in every bad location. My father tried to fix families his whole career in the education business. On one hand you could say any one person saved is a win. On the other hand you could say it's a fart in a whirlwind. The only solution for individuals and families is to move away from the problem areas.

I have a friend who was raised in the situation where in his words it was "prison or welfare." He and I have had numerous conversations on how to fix the "culture rot," which Clay Edwards has deemed it. He has made a nice life for himself and is out of this type of living.

As others have said, you have to value the family unit. The government has created a series of benefits that discourage two parent households. There's not a better way to say it.

You have to fix education and its not just schools. Look at test scores in these predominantly black districts. In elementary school, the gap between these schools and wealthy suburban schools is way smaller or in some cases non-existent. What happens is in middle school, social pressure to not take academic achievement seriously hits. Making good grades is "trying to be white."

And I did not know this until my friend told me, but you have to fix the churches. A lot of black churches are either scams for a husband/wife pastoral team that "owns" the church and its tax exemption, or ripe with liberation theology nonsense that teaches that ones Worldview comes from skin color. He told me that in many of these churches, Moses is seen as the main biblical figure rather than Jesus.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,091
359
83
Yeah but we can get our execution numbers up. There are people on death row for decades. Ridiculous. That dude who stabbed the girl on the subway should be room temp already. The appeal process isn’t for him.
The fact that there have been people exonerated due to scientific evidence makes me hesitant about killing people faster.

I was listening to a podcast about Amanda Knox and what that legal system did just because they wanted a quick conviction should be worrisome to everyone. That isn't just Italy, plenty of cases in the US where someone gets steam rolled. A lot of convictions are based on people admitting to crimes that they actually didn't commit due to psychological interrogations.

Of course with Amanda Knox there was also a language barrier.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,091
359
83
Discussion about gun laws reminds me of when Ole Miss banned sticks from VHS. It was the sticks that were the issue, not people attaching confederate flags to them.

That is not a great comparison since you don't see confederate flags in the stands at Ole Miss any longer. I think everyone would like it if you said we banned guns and people might still have hate in their heart but no one was being shot. At least I hope people would have more love for people's lives than owning a gun.

Again I am saying if it was guaranteed that the result was no one getting killed. Ole Miss has a ban on flags and now you do not see them at the game.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
It's already illegal to shoot someone unless it's self defense. It's also illegal for criminals to have firearms. How about instead of telling me if I can or can't have what gun I want as a law abiding citizen, we start expediting trials for murderers and execute them the day after the trial 100% of the time so there is a massive deterrent to such crimes? That will reduce shootings.
‘Arms’. It isnt a right to bear guns, its a right to bear arms.
That term is very wide in application, and there are already limits applied to what arms are and arent legal to own/use.

So what gun you can and cant have is already restricted. Did you not realize this?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
There is no way to reduce the number of firearms substantially in the US without a government ban or buyback program.
Correct, a ban on some guns would take place.
‘Arms’ are restricted right now, so restricting arms isnt some crazy concept.

What does pro-life have to do with it? Mental illness is the biggest issue we have in these cases.
Valuing life and trying to protect it through legislative action and criminal penalty is, to me, a very reasonable concept. And if you claim you are pro-life, then protecting innocent people from being shot seems like a very easy idea to support.

If we ban guns completely then knives will be next. Do we ban knives? People have driven cars into crowds. Do we ban cars? Freedom doesn't guarantee that people will live without incident.
This dumb slippery slope argument just wont die because it is so simple to come up with in the moment.
No, cars wont be banned. They are not ‘arms’.
No, knives wont be mass banned because they are not ‘arms’ that need to be mass banned.

Once more- I am not suggesting all guns be banned. I clearly stated that. I said some guns should be restricted, just like ‘arms’ are already restricted.
And I clearly said it should be more difficult to own a gun. A higher standard is needed.

Additionally, enforced penalties for a gun being used in a crime are needed. Claiming a registered gun was stolen or lost and then used in crime?…if it wasnt reported, then tjat person is charged with involvement in the crime.

The real issue is people with mental issues. How do we find these people and limit their ability to harm or kill others? That is the real issue and it is a tough one.
Mental illness can explain some shootings. It doesnt explain shootings that are in the heat of the moment or egged on by crowds.
You are masking compassion as blame and trying to claim this issue is because of the mentally ill. That is disgusting.
This issue is because mentally healthy people also misuse guns.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
yea....NO.....why should I be punished for being responsible and accepting instruction from my Dad / Uncles / brother / Grandfather since I was 10 (44 years ago), and passing those same values on to my son? I have shot competitively, hunted all types of game, practiced, and shot just to hear "boom" my entire life. By myself and in fellowship with friends and acquaintances. I would dare to say in all my guns, and 40+ years, I have shot well over 100,000 rounds (in competition we sling some lead, and I think that is a low conservative number)

Why should I be limited to what I own? Why should a law be passed that invades my right to responsibly pursue something that I have enjoyed my entire life?

I genuinely understand why you would say this, but I also respectfully disagree that it is this mindset that further removes accountability, and responsibility from society and makes things worse. Why does the law abiding responsible citizen have to pay a price for those that can not simply abide my modest laws?

I will tell you this, I can invite you into my home, and you would never see a gun or ounce of ammo........but if you come into my home uninvited w/ ill intent, you would realize the error in your decision making process very quick............and it is that error in making decisions that should never guide a law that takes away from those that have no problem abiding in the law.
You are already limited in what arms you can own and use.

That very good point aside, this is a case of ‘me vs we’. Your arguments are entirelynself based. They are selfish in nature. You are prioritizing you over a societal improvement.

Once more, I did not suggest a full ban on all guns.
Your selfish perspective is a common view in this country. This is a give and take between selfishness and imoroved societal safety.
One always wons and one always loses.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
The problem is once you start chipping away at the 2A then it becomes easier to keep doing it. There's already some lawmakers and their supporters that are for a full repeal of the 2A. And some of those other countries that have "figured it out" now have people getting arrested for social media posts. You address the reasons this violence is taking place.
2A is already restricted. I cant own or use all sorts of arms.
As for your social media arrest concerns, I will say that the dumbest thing we could do, is do nothing about gun deaths and shootings because a countet halfway around the world arrests people for what they say online.

Seriously, that is your argument. Its absurd.

I agree that addressing why the violence is happening is needed.
Shootings are happening because people get emotional and have easy access to guns and bullets.
That is why gun violence is happening.
It is very easy to determine.

Also, guns are far from one of the leading causes of death in this country. If all this hand wringing is about saving lives, how about "common sense" control measures on the leading causes. The first being heart disease. Maybe we should ban KFC and Taco Bell. No longer allow govt money to be used by citizens to buy twinkies and hamburger helper in Kroger. Fatal car accidents...nobody needs a car that can go 120. Maybe we should ban engines that can go over 40mph. Bring those causes of death down to the levels of gun violence then we can talk about that.
Guns dont need to be the leading cause of death for us to act and work to reduce shootings.

Gun violence is hurting others and is a safety concern.
Eating taco bell is hurting yourself and is a health concern.
That comparison is dumb.

But sure- I am happy to entertain looking for ways to make us safer and healthier.
Reduce gun access and ban trans fats. Perfect, we are on the same page now.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
We know why you made your original post. It’s obvious. Agenda.

We can discuss limiting amendment 2A AFTER we fix crime and fatherless homes and government spending.

I won’t be reading your long meaningless response that is inevitably dumb as 17.
Why cant reducing gun access be something that can be worked on while fatherless homes and government spending are also worked on?

Multiple things can be worked on at once.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
Bingo. If the U.S. justice system started executing murders, the murders would decrease.

But what the U.S. has now is posers on social media with their guns, killing people and get street creed while they are fed and housed in the prison.
Execution? Well that is the antithesis of valuing life.

“I value life, except in the following 8 instances!”

Too funny.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter
Aug 23, 2012
655
778
93
Discussion about gun laws reminds me of when Ole Miss banned sticks from VHS. It was the sticks that were the issue, not people attaching confederate flags to them.

It worked. It’s actually brilliant if you think of the 1st amendment issues that it circumvented without infringing on anyone’s 1st amendment rights.
 

Pookieray

Senior
Oct 14, 2012
1,089
927
113
The right to have a gun shouldn't go away.
We have limitations on what constitutes 'bear arms' right now, so limitations are clearly acceptable.

I fully agree that supportive 2 parent households are more ideal than 1 parent households, simply from a statistical results perspective.
And I fully agree that limits and expectations are important in childhood and society.

But school and public Shootings aren't new. They aren't some recent phenomenon.
We will never fully eliminate Shootings. Valuing life will reduce Shootings.
Reducing legal fire arms will reduce Shootings.

Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
Reducing LEGAL firearms? I would suggest that these shooters are in possession of firearms that we NOT legally purchased, not all but a large portion. If the firearms are stolen property they were not legal, if they were a "straw" purchase they were not legally purchased. If the shooter has DV or Felony arrest and has a firearm it is illegal whether or not paperwork was filled out and the SS# used hadn't been entered into the system and the paperwork was filled out by untruthful answers.
The majority of shootings are done by illegal firearms by those who obtained firearms illegally.
 

Pookieray

Senior
Oct 14, 2012
1,089
927
113
Yep. Nothing we can do about it. It’s like this in every modern industrialized country in the world. No country has ever figured out how not to have this. **********
Every modern industrialized country in the world has it figured out how to stop it???

Maybe you meant how to reduce it instead?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Hugh's Burner Phone

All-American
Aug 3, 2017
5,034
5,345
113
2A is already restricted. I cant own or use all sorts of arms.
As for your social media arrest concerns, I will say that the dumbest thing we could do, is do nothing about gun deaths and shootings because a countet halfway around the world arrests people for what they say online.

Seriously, that is your argument. Its absurd.

I agree that addressing why the violence is happening is needed.
Shootings are happening because people get emotional and have easy access to guns and bullets.
That is why gun violence is happening.
It is very easy to determine.


Guns dont need to be the leading cause of death for us to act and work to reduce shootings.

Gun violence is hurting others and is a safety concern.
Eating taco bell is hurting yourself and is a health concern.
That comparison is dumb.

But sure- I am happy to entertain looking for ways to make us safer and healthier.
Reduce gun access and ban trans fats. Perfect, we are on the same page now.
I, as a law abiding citizen, should not have my rights restricted in any way because somebody else is a POS with no regard for human life. It's really that simple. Everywhere guns have been banned or severely restricted it has not ended well. Ask the Native Americans of 1880's America. Ask the Jews in 1930's Germany. Ask 1970's Cambodia. And ask 2025 Brits.

I feel safe in saying 90%+ of all murders in the country today are in some way drug related. Get that **** out of this country and keep it out and watch the violence in this country plummet.
 

BTCMoonBoy

Sophomore
Dec 4, 2024
193
162
43
People who are treated with low expectations from the day they are born will usually perform as expected.
Bull5hit - when you are surrounded by human garbage you smell like trash. Every person is born a blank slate. Hell people can tame and live with wild animals
 

BTCMoonBoy

Sophomore
Dec 4, 2024
193
162
43
Well the USA is safer than a lot of places so….
Actually it’s not. Men can walk the streets of many capital cities around the world after midnight with worrying about a young thug putting a gun in your face. Most places in Asia and Middle East are safe. Europe you’re limited to non-invader areas. Of course Africa is a no. Blax are raised that whites are the cause of their problems so avoid those areas. Indians Muslims are safe unless a easy target white females
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

MagnoliaHunter

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2007
1,500
1,222
113
Yeah but we can get our execution numbers up. There are people on death row for decades. Ridiculous. That dude who stabbed the girl on the subway should be room temp already. The appeal process isn’t for him.
Yes. As that great scholar Ron White said, if 3 or more people saw you do it, you go to the front of the line. Or in this case, if its on video, you go straight to the front of the line.
 

MagnoliaHunter

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2007
1,500
1,222
113
I’ve got a hell of a start.

START at a 5 year sentence enhancement for any crime in which a gun was used to either intimidate or cause harm. Served day for day. No parole. No plea. No sympathy.

That’s on top of what the sentence is in the underlying crime.

That should be agreed on by people who are anti gun and pro gun.
17 that. Any crime committed with a weapon should be the death penalty. If you have a weapon, you are possibly using it. Fry your ***.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
I, as a law abiding citizen, should not have my rights restricted in any way because somebody else is a POS with no regard for human life. It's really that simple. Everywhere guns have been banned or severely restricted it has not ended well. Ask the Native Americans of 1880's America. Ask the Jews in 1930's Germany. Ask 1970's Cambodia. And ask 2025 Brits.

I feel safe in saying 90%+ of all murders in the country today are in some way drug related. Get that **** out of this country and keep it out and watch the violence in this country plummet.
Your rights are not restricted just because fewer guns are available. You still have the right to arms.
You are currently restricted from owning multiple types of ‘arms’. What I am suggesting is no different from what currently exists.
 

TheDawg-Pound

Senior
Dec 21, 2024
672
498
63
We already incarcerate close to 1% of our population. I think 20% of the entire world’s prisoners are in the US.
Thanks to Biden letting other countries sending all there criminals over here. Then the rot here for worse and jails are full so they just keep letting criminals out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BTCMoonBoy

MagnoliaHunter

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2007
1,500
1,222
113
Correct, a ban on some guns would take place.
‘Arms’ are restricted right now, so restricting arms isnt some crazy concept.


Valuing life and trying to protect it through legislative action and criminal penalty is, to me, a very reasonable concept. And if you claim you are pro-life, then protecting innocent people from being shot seems like a very easy idea to support.


This dumb slippery slope argument just wont die because it is so simple to come up with in the moment.
No, cars wont be banned. They are not ‘arms’.
No, knives wont be mass banned because they are not ‘arms’ that need to be mass banned.

Once more- I am not suggesting all guns be banned. I clearly stated that. I said some guns should be restricted, just like ‘arms’ are already restricted.
And I clearly said it should be more difficult to own a gun. A higher standard is needed.

Additionally, enforced penalties for a gun being used in a crime are needed. Claiming a registered gun was stolen or lost and then used in crime?…if it wasnt reported, then tjat person is charged with involvement in the crime.


Mental illness can explain some shootings. It doesnt explain shootings that are in the heat of the moment or egged on by crowds.
You are masking compassion as blame and trying to claim this issue is because of the mentally ill. That is disgusting.
This issue is because mentally healthy people also misuse guns.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. mstateglfr is not a real person. It's AI bot used by DS to generate clicks. Nobody smart enough to use a computer to get on this website can be this stupid about every subject on the web.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,964
5,815
113
Tell me you are historically ignorant without telling me you are historically ignorant.
Just because something may have happened in history does not excuse it now nor does it justify it now.
Supporting the death penalty is counter to being pro life. You can wiggle and try to justify, but it’s just lying to yourself.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

BTCMoonBoy

Sophomore
Dec 4, 2024
193
162
43
I've said it before and I'll say it again. mstateglfr is not a real person. It's AI bot used by DS to generate clicks. Nobody smart enough to use a computer to get on this website can be this stupid about every subject on the web.
Nah just a cuck