People who are treated with low expectations from the day they are born will usually perform as expected.
I don't know if I would call it simple, but I think this is the best solution - fund our criminal justice system the way we fund our military. More police, more courts, and more jails, no matter the cost.There’s a simple fix and I would be willing to pay more taxes for it ….follow the El Salvador plan. Build more jails and fill them up!!! 1% of the people cause 99% of the problems. No more deadbeat fathers, liquor store thieves, 5hitty 5hitty obese b1tches robbing Walmarts or wrecking coffee shops, and no more 30 arrest thugs stabbing wyt girls on a train
I’ve got a hell of a start.Give us a solution
Black people often shoot one another. Don’t shoot the messenger. ( pun intended )That’s 5 mostly all black schools in two days. Is there a gang war going on I’m not aware of?
If it was, would we need to direct our military to go in and take action against our own citizens?Well the USA is safer than a lot of places so….
There is no way to reduce the number of firearms substantially in the US without a government ban or buyback program. What does pro-life have to do with it? Mental illness is the biggest issue we have in these cases.The right to have a gun shouldn't go away.
We have limitations on what constitutes 'bear arms' right now, so limitations are clearly acceptable.
I fully agree that supportive 2 parent households are more ideal than 1 parent households, simply from a statistical results perspective.
And I fully agree that limits and expectations are important in childhood and society.
But school and public Shootings aren't new. They aren't some recent phenomenon.
We will never fully eliminate Shootings. Valuing life will reduce Shootings.
Reducing legal fire arms will reduce Shootings.
Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
yea....NO.....why should I be punished for being responsible and accepting instruction from my Dad / Uncles / brother / Grandfather since I was 10 (44 years ago), and passing those same values on to my son? I have shot competitively, hunted all types of game, practiced, and shot just to hear "boom" my entire life. By myself and in fellowship with friends and acquaintances. I would dare to say in all my guns, and 40+ years, I have shot well over 100,000 rounds (in competition we sling some lead, and I think that is a low conservative number)Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
If there was a simple fix we would have done it years ago. There is no fix for this that society will accept. Every person has free will to be different than those they were raised with and there are good people in every bad location. My father tried to fix families his whole career in the education business. On one hand you could say any one person saved is a win. On the other hand you could say it's a fart in a whirlwind. The only solution for individuals and families is to move away from the problem areas.
The fact that there have been people exonerated due to scientific evidence makes me hesitant about killing people faster.Yeah but we can get our execution numbers up. There are people on death row for decades. Ridiculous. That dude who stabbed the girl on the subway should be room temp already. The appeal process isn’t for him.
Discussion about gun laws reminds me of when Ole Miss banned sticks from VHS. It was the sticks that were the issue, not people attaching confederate flags to them.
‘Arms’. It isnt a right to bear guns, its a right to bear arms.It's already illegal to shoot someone unless it's self defense. It's also illegal for criminals to have firearms. How about instead of telling me if I can or can't have what gun I want as a law abiding citizen, we start expediting trials for murderers and execute them the day after the trial 100% of the time so there is a massive deterrent to such crimes? That will reduce shootings.
Correct, a ban on some guns would take place.There is no way to reduce the number of firearms substantially in the US without a government ban or buyback program.
Valuing life and trying to protect it through legislative action and criminal penalty is, to me, a very reasonable concept. And if you claim you are pro-life, then protecting innocent people from being shot seems like a very easy idea to support.What does pro-life have to do with it? Mental illness is the biggest issue we have in these cases.
This dumb slippery slope argument just wont die because it is so simple to come up with in the moment.If we ban guns completely then knives will be next. Do we ban knives? People have driven cars into crowds. Do we ban cars? Freedom doesn't guarantee that people will live without incident.
Mental illness can explain some shootings. It doesnt explain shootings that are in the heat of the moment or egged on by crowds.The real issue is people with mental issues. How do we find these people and limit their ability to harm or kill others? That is the real issue and it is a tough one.
You are already limited in what arms you can own and use.yea....NO.....why should I be punished for being responsible and accepting instruction from my Dad / Uncles / brother / Grandfather since I was 10 (44 years ago), and passing those same values on to my son? I have shot competitively, hunted all types of game, practiced, and shot just to hear "boom" my entire life. By myself and in fellowship with friends and acquaintances. I would dare to say in all my guns, and 40+ years, I have shot well over 100,000 rounds (in competition we sling some lead, and I think that is a low conservative number)
Why should I be limited to what I own? Why should a law be passed that invades my right to responsibly pursue something that I have enjoyed my entire life?
I genuinely understand why you would say this, but I also respectfully disagree that it is this mindset that further removes accountability, and responsibility from society and makes things worse. Why does the law abiding responsible citizen have to pay a price for those that can not simply abide my modest laws?
I will tell you this, I can invite you into my home, and you would never see a gun or ounce of ammo........but if you come into my home uninvited w/ ill intent, you would realize the error in your decision making process very quick............and it is that error in making decisions that should never guide a law that takes away from those that have no problem abiding in the law.
Well I’m not going to your neighbors, he doesn’t have anything that I’d want!I have a house full of guns. My wife and I are both very proficient at using them. My next door neighbors don’t have any guns. If you are a criminal which house are you going to target at 3:00am? 2A helps keep us safe.
2A is already restricted. I cant own or use all sorts of arms.The problem is once you start chipping away at the 2A then it becomes easier to keep doing it. There's already some lawmakers and their supporters that are for a full repeal of the 2A. And some of those other countries that have "figured it out" now have people getting arrested for social media posts. You address the reasons this violence is taking place.
Guns dont need to be the leading cause of death for us to act and work to reduce shootings.Also, guns are far from one of the leading causes of death in this country. If all this hand wringing is about saving lives, how about "common sense" control measures on the leading causes. The first being heart disease. Maybe we should ban KFC and Taco Bell. No longer allow govt money to be used by citizens to buy twinkies and hamburger helper in Kroger. Fatal car accidents...nobody needs a car that can go 120. Maybe we should ban engines that can go over 40mph. Bring those causes of death down to the levels of gun violence then we can talk about that.
Why cant reducing gun access be something that can be worked on while fatherless homes and government spending are also worked on?We know why you made your original post. It’s obvious. Agenda.
We can discuss limiting amendment 2A AFTER we fix crime and fatherless homes and government spending.
I won’t be reading your long meaningless response that is inevitably dumb as 17.
Execution? Well that is the antithesis of valuing life.Bingo. If the U.S. justice system started executing murders, the murders would decrease.
But what the U.S. has now is posers on social media with their guns, killing people and get street creed while they are fed and housed in the prison.
Discussion about gun laws reminds me of when Ole Miss banned sticks from VHS. It was the sticks that were the issue, not people attaching confederate flags to them.
Reducing LEGAL firearms? I would suggest that these shooters are in possession of firearms that we NOT legally purchased, not all but a large portion. If the firearms are stolen property they were not legal, if they were a "straw" purchase they were not legally purchased. If the shooter has DV or Felony arrest and has a firearm it is illegal whether or not paperwork was filled out and the SS# used hadn't been entered into the system and the paperwork was filled out by untruthful answers.The right to have a gun shouldn't go away.
We have limitations on what constitutes 'bear arms' right now, so limitations are clearly acceptable.
I fully agree that supportive 2 parent households are more ideal than 1 parent households, simply from a statistical results perspective.
And I fully agree that limits and expectations are important in childhood and society.
But school and public Shootings aren't new. They aren't some recent phenomenon.
We will never fully eliminate Shootings. Valuing life will reduce Shootings.
Reducing legal fire arms will reduce Shootings.
Anyone who is pro-life should support reducing gun access and gun volumes...or they need to really ask themselves if they prioritize life and are actually pro-life.
Again, I am not proposing getting rid of 2A.
We already limit what legal 'arms' means.
Every modern industrialized country in the world has it figured out how to stop it???Yep. Nothing we can do about it. It’s like this in every modern industrialized country in the world. No country has ever figured out how not to have this. **********
There were multiple shootings so obviously enough people are not in jail. If you’re old enough to shoot a gun you’re old enough to work hard labor in jailWe already incarcerate more people than any other first world nation.
I, as a law abiding citizen, should not have my rights restricted in any way because somebody else is a POS with no regard for human life. It's really that simple. Everywhere guns have been banned or severely restricted it has not ended well. Ask the Native Americans of 1880's America. Ask the Jews in 1930's Germany. Ask 1970's Cambodia. And ask 2025 Brits.2A is already restricted. I cant own or use all sorts of arms.
As for your social media arrest concerns, I will say that the dumbest thing we could do, is do nothing about gun deaths and shootings because a countet halfway around the world arrests people for what they say online.
Seriously, that is your argument. Its absurd.
I agree that addressing why the violence is happening is needed.
Shootings are happening because people get emotional and have easy access to guns and bullets.
That is why gun violence is happening.
It is very easy to determine.
Guns dont need to be the leading cause of death for us to act and work to reduce shootings.
Gun violence is hurting others and is a safety concern.
Eating taco bell is hurting yourself and is a health concern.
That comparison is dumb.
But sure- I am happy to entertain looking for ways to make us safer and healthier.
Reduce gun access and ban trans fats. Perfect, we are on the same page now.
Bull5hit - when you are surrounded by human garbage you smell like trash. Every person is born a blank slate. Hell people can tame and live with wild animalsPeople who are treated with low expectations from the day they are born will usually perform as expected.
Tell me you are historically ignorant without telling me you are historically ignorant.Execution? Well that is the antithesis of valuing life.
“I value life, except in the following 8 instances!”
Too funny.
Actually it’s not. Men can walk the streets of many capital cities around the world after midnight with worrying about a young thug putting a gun in your face. Most places in Asia and Middle East are safe. Europe you’re limited to non-invader areas. Of course Africa is a no. Blax are raised that whites are the cause of their problems so avoid those areas. Indians Muslims are safe unless a easy target white femalesWell the USA is safer than a lot of places so….
Yes. As that great scholar Ron White said, if 3 or more people saw you do it, you go to the front of the line. Or in this case, if its on video, you go straight to the front of the line.Yeah but we can get our execution numbers up. There are people on death row for decades. Ridiculous. That dude who stabbed the girl on the subway should be room temp already. The appeal process isn’t for him.
17 that. Any crime committed with a weapon should be the death penalty. If you have a weapon, you are possibly using it. Fry your ***.I’ve got a hell of a start.
START at a 5 year sentence enhancement for any crime in which a gun was used to either intimidate or cause harm. Served day for day. No parole. No plea. No sympathy.
That’s on top of what the sentence is in the underlying crime.
That should be agreed on by people who are anti gun and pro gun.
Your rights are not restricted just because fewer guns are available. You still have the right to arms.I, as a law abiding citizen, should not have my rights restricted in any way because somebody else is a POS with no regard for human life. It's really that simple. Everywhere guns have been banned or severely restricted it has not ended well. Ask the Native Americans of 1880's America. Ask the Jews in 1930's Germany. Ask 1970's Cambodia. And ask 2025 Brits.
I feel safe in saying 90%+ of all murders in the country today are in some way drug related. Get that **** out of this country and keep it out and watch the violence in this country plummet.
Thanks to Biden letting other countries sending all there criminals over here. Then the rot here for worse and jails are full so they just keep letting criminals out.We already incarcerate close to 1% of our population. I think 20% of the entire world’s prisoners are in the US.
Correct, a ban on some guns would take place.
‘Arms’ are restricted right now, so restricting arms isnt some crazy concept.
Valuing life and trying to protect it through legislative action and criminal penalty is, to me, a very reasonable concept. And if you claim you are pro-life, then protecting innocent people from being shot seems like a very easy idea to support.
This dumb slippery slope argument just wont die because it is so simple to come up with in the moment.
No, cars wont be banned. They are not ‘arms’.
No, knives wont be mass banned because they are not ‘arms’ that need to be mass banned.
Once more- I am not suggesting all guns be banned. I clearly stated that. I said some guns should be restricted, just like ‘arms’ are already restricted.
And I clearly said it should be more difficult to own a gun. A higher standard is needed.
Additionally, enforced penalties for a gun being used in a crime are needed. Claiming a registered gun was stolen or lost and then used in crime?…if it wasnt reported, then tjat person is charged with involvement in the crime.
Mental illness can explain some shootings. It doesnt explain shootings that are in the heat of the moment or egged on by crowds.
You are masking compassion as blame and trying to claim this issue is because of the mentally ill. That is disgusting.
This issue is because mentally healthy people also misuse guns.
Just because something may have happened in history does not excuse it now nor does it justify it now.Tell me you are historically ignorant without telling me you are historically ignorant.
Nah just a cuckI've said it before and I'll say it again. mstateglfr is not a real person. It's AI bot used by DS to generate clicks. Nobody smart enough to use a computer to get on this website can be this stupid about every subject on the web.