Correct, a ban on some guns would take place.
‘Arms’ are restricted right now, so restricting arms isnt some crazy concept.
Valuing life and trying to protect it through legislative action and criminal penalty is, to me, a very reasonable concept. And if you claim you are pro-life, then protecting innocent people from being shot seems like a very easy idea to support.
This dumb slippery slope argument just wont die because it is so simple to come up with in the moment.
No, cars wont be banned. They are not ‘arms’.
No, knives wont be mass banned because they are not ‘arms’ that need to be mass banned.
Once more- I am not suggesting all guns be banned. I clearly stated that. I said some guns should be restricted, just like ‘arms’ are already restricted.
And I clearly said it should be more difficult to own a gun. A higher standard is needed.
Additionally, enforced penalties for a gun being used in a crime are needed. Claiming a registered gun was stolen or lost and then used in crime?…if it wasnt reported, then tjat person is charged with involvement in the crime.
Mental illness can explain some shootings. It doesnt explain shootings that are in the heat of the moment or egged on by crowds.
You are masking compassion as blame and trying to claim this issue is because of the mentally ill. That is disgusting.
This issue is because mentally healthy people also misuse guns.