Anybody been to the Ark Park yet?

jockstrap_mcgee

New member
Jan 22, 2009
1,354
913
0
Islam and Catholicism have been great Fathers of Science. It's shame how religion is taking us back to the dark ages.

A lot of biblical scholars were very curious about Charles Darwin and his thoughts on natural selection. At the same time, fundamentalism was really taking off and needed a rallying cry. All of a sudden, evangelicals wanted nothing to do with science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKserialkiller

CatFromDaHood

New member
Mar 23, 2016
293
131
0
Funny how so many Christians can't quite get the "be Christ-like" thing down and act like asses.....at least non-believers have an excuse not to.
 

WildcatfaninOhio

New member
May 22, 2002
18,247
1,004
0
to clarify, I certainly do believe a lot of things in the Old Testament actually happened, like the Jews being in slavery and leaving Egypt, for one. Just was really talking about the Creation myth and Noahs Ark. How can one be a thinking person and look at all the scientific evidence we have and think the world was really created in seven days, come on, we all know that didn't happen. Many stories like that in the Old Testament. But that doesn't mean God did not create the world and the universe, just not in the same way as described in Genesis.

But I do believe in the resurrection, and the stories in Acts, the letters to Romans, etc. Do you not believe those men wrote all those letters and traveled all that way to bring the good news? And ended up being killed for their faith? I believe something miraculous must have happened to have inspired them, else they never would have done the things they did.

Interesting that you mention the Jews being in Egypt.

So, in Egypt we know that they viewed their leader, The Pharaoh, as an earthly deity. The living son of their god, Ra. And they believed that upon his death the Pharaoh would be resurrected and go to the sky to be with Ra. They built the pyramids as resurrection machines. They buried the Pharaoh with his earthly belongings so he could take them with him. And this dates back many centuries before Jesus. Fast forward...

We know that Jesus was a Jew. So where could the Jews have gotten a story about a living son of god that died, was buried in a stone chamber, and was resurrected to go live with god?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RonEJones

UKGrad93

New member
Jun 20, 2007
17,437
12,538
0
Sure. But were they living at the same time as Noah and the great flood? I'd say those Iowan sea creatures outdate the great flood.

By the way, do we have an approximate time on the flood?
My bad. Two different floods/events. First we had Pangea where a lot of the world as we know it was under water, then we had Noah's flood. I'm not much of an ancient history scholar.

People are too hing up on the religious aspect of this thing. Millions of people fork out lots of money every year to go see make believe stuff in central Florida. Noah's Ark is entertainment.
 

ky8335

New member
Oct 29, 2005
1,287
106
0
 

IdaCat

Well-known member
May 8, 2004
68,809
1,290
113
Maybe.
The thing is, though, we will never know. There is no way for science or religion to fully illuminate the mystery of creation.

It's fun to discuss, though, and I think it's a shame that science is pitted agsinst religion so often

Science is the sole proven authority for revealing the mysteries of the cosmos. Religion pretends to be the sole authority, but only provides false, absurd mythological explanations. As long as this is understood, there is no conflict. Ignorant religious believers and wacko leaders like Ken Ham who try to use religion in the business of science are who cause conflict.
 

Ukbrassowtipin

New member
Aug 12, 2011
82,110
3,051
0
Science is the sole proven authority for revealing the mysteries of the cosmos. Religion pretends to be the sole authority, but only provides false, absurd mythological explanations. As long as this is understood, there is no conflict. Ignorant religious believers and wacko leaders like Ken Ham who try to use religion in the business of science are who cause conflict.

Agree.

I believe there are two types of religious people tho.

A. Those who use religion as a way to channel themselves when they have some sort of spirituality, or in other words it's their way of helping them process an interaction from the environment that provokes emotion. You don't have to be religious to be spiritual, especially if you realize all things in the universe are made from the same things.

Then there's B. People who use religion and the bible as a textbook or science of what happened. Unfortunately for these people, who believe God is mysterious, through time their religion will constantly diminish as science keeps knocking pillars out of it to prove what really happened.

I think religion is a part of the human evolution process to describe how we interpreted things when we didn't understand them.

My favorite fantasy comeback from religious people is "oh so it just happened".. well of course we don't fully understand all the things of the universe yet as we progress through science, but theres alot of evidence which supports most of how things work. ...that would be like asking Moses to explain why we didnt always get static shock. Since he doesn't get static shock he would assume that it's not something that exists and there's nothing needed to prevent it. Or he would just say only God shocks people if he wishes. But it does exist and it is prevented by.....protons.

Plus, if "i bet it just happened" is the scholarly comeback, well a magical invisible wizard made it, who by the way..he himself "just existed" doesn't sound much better.
 

.S&C.

New member
Jul 8, 2014
45,292
6,388
0
Agree.

I believe there are two types of religious people tho.

A. Those who use religion as a way to channel themselves when they have some sort of spirituality, or in other words it's their way of helping them process an interaction from the environment that provokes emotion. You don't have to be religious to be spiritual, especially if you realize all things in the universe are made from the same things.

Then there's B. People who use religion and the bible as a textbook or science of what happened. Unfortunately for these people, who believe God is mysterious, through time their religion will constantly diminish as science keeps knocking pillars out of it to prove what really happened.

I think religion is a part of the human evolution process to describe how we interpreted things when we didn't understand them.

My favorite fantasy comeback from religious people is "oh so it just happened".. well of course we don't fully understand all the things of the universe yet as we progress through science, but theres alot of evidence which supports most of how things work. ...that would be like asking Moses to explain why we didnt always get static shock. Since he doesn't get static shock he would assume that it's not something that exists and there's nothing needed to prevent it. Or he would just say only God shocks people if he wishes. But it does exist and it is prevented by.....protons.

Plus, if "i bet it just happened" is the scholarly comeback, well a magical invisible wizard made it, who by the way..he himself "just existed" doesn't sound much better.

There is plenty of evidence that points to creation. It's just how someone wants to look at it.

And really, thinking everything came from "the nothing" isn't logical at all. Only takes a few minutes of thought to rule it out.

IMO.
 

MegaBlue05

New member
Mar 8, 2014
10,042
2,686
0
What is everyone's opinion of public schools going to the Ark Encounter for field trips?

http://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article89061842.html

Personally, I think it's ridiculous to teach dinosaurs on a boat to children, but I didn't buy in. I find it equally ridiculous to those on the other side of this debate who spout the "Krish-shin Nay-shun" BS as a reason to justify having public schools indoctrinate children into the Christian faith. I'm a firm believer that parents should teach lil Johnny about supernatural deities, while schools teach him reading, writing, arithmetic and science. I also have no problem with private religious schools going there for a field trip, as you know going in that indoctrination is part of what you're paying them for.
 

jockstrap_mcgee

New member
Jan 22, 2009
1,354
913
0
Science is the sole proven authority for revealing the mysteries of the cosmos. Religion pretends to be the sole authority, but only provides false, absurd mythological explanations. As long as this is understood, there is no conflict. Ignorant religious believers and wacko leaders like Ken Ham who try to use religion in the business of science are who cause conflict.

I agree that it's silly for religious leaders to attempt to disprove science. However, i think its equally silly for scientists to try and disprove faith. Science focuses on the natural world. Faith, the supernatural.
 

jockstrap_mcgee

New member
Jan 22, 2009
1,354
913
0
What is everyone's opinion of public schools going to the Ark Encounter for field trips?

http://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article89061842.html

Personally, I think it's ridiculous to teach dinosaurs on a boat to children, but I didn't buy in. I find it equally ridiculous to those on the other side of this debate who spout the "Krish-shin Nay-shun" BS as a reason to justify having public schools indoctrinate children into the Christian faith. I'm a firm believer that parents should teach lil Johnny about supernatural deities, while schools teach him reading, writing, arithmetic and science. I also have no problem with private religious schools going there for a field trip, as you know going in that indoctrination is part of what you're paying them for.

Separation of church and state all the way. I don't want any religious beliefs encroaching into public education because if one is allowed, they all will eventually.
 

DaBossIsBack

New member
Jun 28, 2013
3,359
1,917
0
What is everyone's opinion of public schools going to the Ark Encounter for field trips?

http://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article89061842.html

Personally, I think it's ridiculous to teach dinosaurs on a boat to children, but I didn't buy in. I find it equally ridiculous to those on the other side of this debate who spout the "Krish-shin Nay-shun" BS as a reason to justify having public schools indoctrinate children into the Christian faith. I'm a firm believer that parents should teach lil Johnny about supernatural deities, while schools teach him reading, writing, arithmetic and science. I also have no problem with private religious schools going there for a field trip, as you know going in that indoctrination is part of what you're paying them for.
Every school in Eastern Kentucky probably has a trip already booked.
 

IdaCat

Well-known member
May 8, 2004
68,809
1,290
113
I agree that it's silly for religious leaders to attempt to disprove science. However, i think its equally silly for scientists to try and disprove faith. Science focuses on the natural world. Faith, the supernatural.

Yes, science is based on supporting evidence here in our natural reality. Yet, the only evidence pertaining to religious faith in this realm is evidence against it.

If you've done any objective study, you know that the Bible is full of contradictions, inconsistencies, historical flaws, and wild absurd claims all pertaining to circumstances in the natural world, the realm where science, logic, and reason are entirely applicable and trustworthy. When the Bible's natural world claims fail so miserably, why is it granted *any* authority in it's further claims of the untestable supernatural? Because it gives believers a warm burning bosom (as the LDS claim)?

What kind of almighty creator of the universe would provide false mythological ******** and legend as his only communication and then demand or even expect us to believe it?

Scientists don't need to disprove religious faith. It disproves itself. Unfortunately, many people are afraid to use basic common sense and instead follow the lunacy of religious nutjobs who want to destroy science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RonEJones

RonEJones

New member
Apr 8, 2010
12,748
315
0
Yes, science is based on supporting evidence here in our natural reality. Yet, the only evidence pertaining to religious faith in this realm is evidence against it.

If you've done any objective study, you know that the Bible is full of contradictions, inconsistencies, historical flaws, and wild absurd claims all pertaining to circumstances in the natural world, the realm where science, logic, and reason are entirely applicable and trustworthy. When the Bible's natural world claims fail so miserably, why is it granted *any* authority in it's further claims of the untestable supernatural? Because it gives believers a warm burning bosom (as the LDS claim)?

What kind of almighty creator of the universe would provide false mythological ******** and legend as his only communication and then demand or even expect us to believe it?

Scientists don't need to disprove religious faith. It disproves itself. Unfortunately, many people are afraid to use basic common sense and instead follow the lunacy of religious nutjobs who want to destroy science.

Ida, my man, you never disappoint. Keep bringing the heat.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,320
2,117
113
If you don't like it or aren't interested, don't go. I have no desire to visit, and thats what I plan on doing.

If schools go I'm sure the kids will have to get a permission slip, like they do for any trip. If a parent objects, don't send your kid.

Hell, the only reason it got built was because Atheists got their panties in a wad. Then it became a "how big a boy are ya" confrontation.