Bo Bounds: 5 wins or bust

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
12,430
9,622
113
we MUST drop more millions to get a coach that will win 2 more games, we MUST pay Lebby his buyout and all his assistant coaches, and we MUST pay a new coach and all his assistants MORE than what everyone makes today. we MUST pay more NIL and we MUST do this, money is no object, fans demand TWO MORE WINS even if they cost us $5M each!
 

paindonthurt

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2025
1,534
1,139
113
I ran out of things to listen to this weekend while doing house work, so I listened to a couple Out of Bounds show segments. Bo seems to think Lebby needs to win 5 games or he needs to get pushed out. He also said he doesn’t understand why SPS posters are so resigned to the fact Lebby is coming back unless he has another 2-10 season.

He then proceeds to go through the transfer portal list like it was the first time he’s seen it. [lol, how can a radio host who brags about his connections at State and who talks about sports 15 hours a week be so ignorant about what’s going on in Starkville]

Anyway, do you think Lebby should be fired if State goes 4-8 or 0-8 in the SEC? If so, do you think State could hire a good coach after firing 3/4 coaches in two years or less?
He's getting a 3rd year barring some sort of controversy or a complete melt down like 2-10.
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
692
961
93
I'm not too worried about what happened decades ago before the modern landscape of college football, but I'm very confident that we could have poached >90% of G5 head coaches instead of hiring Moorhead, Leach, Arnett, or Lebby if we had wanted to go that route.
I do believe that will be route we will take after Lebby.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
7,086
9,625
112
Having cohesion just for the sake of having cohesion doesn't make any sense if the coaches are awful. You're just delaying the inevitable. If he goes winless in the SEC again this year and we don't fire him we are not serious at all.
We're near the top of the SEC in buyouts being paid and we've got the smallest budget and mediocre NIL. We had no P4 interest last time and really, there aren't any P4 guys with baggage we would be willing to pay a high price for. We need a situation like with baseball where the timing was perfect. We may have to wait for that..
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
692
961
93
We're near the top of the SEC in buyouts being paid and we've got the smallest budget and mediocre NIL. We had no P4 interest last time and really, there aren't any P4 guys with baggage we would be willing to pay a high price for. We need a situation like with baseball where the timing was perfect. We may have to wait for that..
Help me Obi-Dan you're our only hope
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
8,488
5,373
113
No. We. Don’t. This is literally the dumbest take imaginable. If you have a poor performer you fire him. You don’t say, well let’s keep him around for a year or two longer because the last guy sucked too & we had to fire him.
If we don't give him at least three years the next hire will make Rick Ray look like John Wooden. You have to give a coach a legitimate chance at a program like MSU football. We used up a lot of credit of that kind by firing Arnett after one year. We absolutely can't do the quick trigger thing again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBannerM

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
8,488
5,373
113
I would say that isn't true. We are an SEC job and can pay like one. Virtually any G5 coach would take our job (the only exceptions being the ones who are super old and about to retire, or who have family considerations), as would some ACC/Big 12 coaches if we make the money right.
That's just absolutely not true. You only have to look at previous coaching searches we have done. We have repeatedly been turned down by those type of people.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
5,203
1,393
113
That's just absolutely not true. You only have to look at previous coaching searches we have done. We have repeatedly been turned down by those type of people.
I don't believe there was a single example of us offering to triple (or more) a G5 head coach's salary and give him an SEC job, only to have him turn us down at any point in the last decade.

We 100% could have hired Jason Candle or someone like that at any of our last 4 hirings, but chose not to make the offer, for better or worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,271
3,391
108
And he's done nothing to improve the roster in 2 years now. When the total roster talent rankings come out, we'll still be 15th in the SEC, and much closer to 16 than to 14. We may have even fewer 4* players on the roster this fall than we did last fall.
I actually did research on this… Counting four stars is irrelevant but thought it was interesting…
In the 24 roster we had a grand total of 14 that were HS or portal 4 stars. Lebby was responsible for roughly 10 of those.
As it stands today the 25 roster has 25 4 stars…
Only 3 were here before Lebby..
Once again Pat your wrong.
 

John Deaux VII

Well-known member
Jun 7, 2024
651
1,662
93
If the Lebby buyout is 14.3 million he will be here for a while.
If Lebby's buyout is $14.3 million than someone needs their *** kicked.

I've got an idea - lets make a point to only hire coaches with baggage and who have a habit of getting caught with their pants down. If the **** goes south, we can just fire for cause and get out of a buyout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

campshelbydog1116

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2022
4,041
8,974
113
We're near the top of the SEC in buyouts being paid and we've got the smallest budget and mediocre NIL. We had no P4 interest last time and really, there aren't any P4 guys with baggage we would be willing to pay a high price for. We need a situation like with baseball where the timing was perfect. We may have to wait for that..
We don't have a mediocre NIL (well that depends on what your definition of that really means but it's not bad and our expectations more than match what we can pay for NIL wise). We never have P4 interest without someone that has baggage (IE Jackie or Leach) which was my point, but if there is someone like that out there they would be on our radar. We need to move on as fast as we figure out the person in charge isn't a good coach, whenever that is. That is what is best for the program. If you don't know that a guy can't coach after 2 straight winless seasons in the SEC, then you don't need to be in charge of the AD (speaking on Selmon). Hopefully we don't have to find out, and I don't think we are going to be as bad as some do.
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
12,430
9,622
113
Look at Auburn's buyouts as an example of idiots running the assylum. Head coaches today are for better or worse until bankrupcy do we part.
 

campshelbydog1116

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2022
4,041
8,974
113
If Lebby's buyout is $14.3 million than someone needs their *** kicked.

I've got an idea - lets make a point to only hire coaches with baggage and who have a habit of getting caught with their pants down. If the **** goes south, we can just fire for cause and get out of a buyout.
That's honestly not a bad idea for a school like us. No one cares about morality any more anyway so you might as well try to win and if they go crazy then just fire them for cause like you said. It won't be worse than this crap we are in now.
 

John Deaux VII

Well-known member
Jun 7, 2024
651
1,662
93
That's honestly not a bad idea for a school like us. No one cares about morality any more anyway so you might as well try to win and if they go crazy then just fire them for cause like you said. It won't be worse than this crap we are in now.
For what its worth, I think we should have hired Rich Rodriguez when Leach died.
 

curseddawgs

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2021
929
851
93
If we don't give him at least three years the next hire will make Rick Ray look like John Wooden. You have to give a coach a legitimate chance at a program like MSU football. We used up a lot of credit of that kind by firing Arnett after one year. We absolutely can't do the quick trigger thing again.
The Arnett thing was a special situation and everyone in the industry knows that. Now if you fire Lebby after 2 years after semi-recently firing Moorhead after 2 years then your job gets a stigma
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,798
19,751
113
The Arnett thing was a special situation and everyone in the industry knows that. Now if you fire Lebby after 2 years after semi-recently firing Moorhead after 2 years then your job gets a stigma
The only stigma our program has is that we've mostly sucked since Mullen left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Corby.sixpack

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
8,488
5,373
113
The Arnett thing was a special situation and everyone in the industry knows that. Now if you fire Lebby after 2 years after semi-recently firing Moorhead after 2 years then your job gets a stigma
As you pointed out....out of our last three coaches one died. The other two were fired after 1 and 2 years. We can't do that again.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
5,203
1,393
113
The Arnett thing was a special situation and everyone in the industry knows that. Now if you fire Lebby after 2 years after semi-recently firing Moorhead after 2 years then your job gets a stigma
Croom, Moorhead, Lemonis - for all 3, people said it would be a bad look to fire them and it would be hard to find a replacement, but then we were able to make a much better hire.

Good coaches believe they can win anywhere, and there are multiple coaches in the G5 ranks wishing for an SEC opportunity to prove to the world how good they really are (and to greatly increase their salary).
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2019
3,394
3,126
108
“It would look bad if we fired him” seems to be the consensus. No pressure.
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2019
3,394
3,126
108
If he goes 0-8, it won’t look nearly as bad to fire him as it would to bring him back.
There is a
Decent chance of that. A lot depends on
Opponent injuries If taylen green goes down Arkansas game gets closer. Same for Jackson Arnold. If he goes down Auburn game gets a lot closer.

if opponents are healthy I don’t see a win
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,798
19,751
113
There is a
Decent chance of that. A lot depends on
Opponent injuries If taylen green goes down Arkansas game gets closer. Same for Jackson Arnold. If he goes down Auburn game gets a lot closer.

if opponents are healthy I don’t see a win
There’s 2 or 3 we might have a chance to win. But right now, I think we’re 10+ point underdogs in every SEC game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,271
3,391
108
There is a
Decent chance of that. A lot depends on
Opponent injuries If taylen green goes down Arkansas game gets closer. Same for Jackson Arnold. If he goes down Auburn game gets a lot closer.

if opponents are healthy I don’t see a win
We don’t play Auburn… your takes are the worse
So by your logic everyone got better we play in and through the portal but us. Even though we finished higher in the rankings than some our opponents. Arkansas lost a ton through the portal. They will not be nearly as good as you think
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,798
19,751
113
MSU fans have always been way too concerned with how they look in the eyes of others.
It’s ridiculous how paranoid so many of our fans are. As if anyone gives a sh*t about what we do (they don’t). Auburn didn’t care how it would look when they fired Chizek 2 years after he won a national championship. They one’s he wasn’t getting the job done those 2 years so they did what needed to be done. It’s a ruthless business if you want to win.
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
692
961
93
Croom, Moorhead, Lemonis - for all 3, people said it would be a bad look to fire them and it would be hard to find a replacement, but then we were able to make a much better hire.

Good coaches believe they can win anywhere, and there are multiple coaches in the G5 ranks wishing for an SEC opportunity to prove to the world how good they really are (and to greatly increase their salary).
We gave Croom FIVE years. That's comparing apples to oranges.

G5 coaches Chadwell and Fritz told us thanks but not thanks last time.
 

Howiefeltersnstch

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2019
1,855
2,351
98
He will double last years win total. That's success. Bo's opinion means nothing. Maybe the year after we will make a bowl game again
 

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,271
3,391
108
We gave Croom FIVE years. That's comparing apples to oranges.

G5 coaches Chadwell and Fritz told us thanks but not thanks last time.
We didn’t approach Fritz at all. We had conversations with reps from Chadwell early on but some items came up that we passed on. Sumrall wanted a zero buyout clause if UK came open.
Stop making BS these coaches told us no
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
692
961
93
We didn’t approach Fritz at all. We had conversations with reps from Chadwell early on but some items came up that we passed on. Sumrall wanted a zero buyout clause if UK came open.
Stop making BS these coaches told us no
Fair enough. That’s not exactly the “crawling on broken glass” narrative we always hear when talking about moving on from a coach.