Disagree…why does RU have a Current Events board on their On3 platform? JD admitted he wanted no part of it.Wasn't our call. On3 told JD they would not allow the site.
See the RU board. It’s not an On3 issue.I'll reach out to JD again. But not sure it's going to matter. On3 told him no originally when he asked.
The RU board is a complete cesspool, you don't want one.While I did enjoy OT discussions back when we had an LOT board, at this time, today, I have no interest. Our political arena is a cesspool, and I see no reason to think we are any different than the rest of America. Both sides swing way to far.
...aint that America".The RU board is a complete cesspool, you don't want one.
I guess I have a different view.While I did enjoy OT discussions back when we had an LOT board, at this time, today, I have no interest. Our political arena is a cesspool, and I see no reason to think we are any different than the rest of America. Both sides swing way to far.
Yes, I can just ignore it, and if it was resurrected, I would not object. I just see no reason to think that we are the one anonymous group that would avoid the bs that fills every other messaging platform.I guess I have a different view.
First of all, if you don't care for a LOTS board, you don't have to read it or participate in it.
Second, the RU CE Board is a cesspool, but it's always been a cesspool...even their MBB and MFB forums are awful, but that's on the moderators. There are no rules and I almost think they encourage the behavior.
Third, I agree the extremes on both sides take the air out of the room in politics, the MSM and social media. But does that mean that you give up on finding balanced sources or discuss differences (or learn from each other?). I'm not interested in being the victim to extremes.
There are balanced and moderate news sources (like Axios or NewsNation), or you can use that $1,000 computer we have in our pockets get our news. I go back to LOTS and felt there were a wide spectrum of views and opinions and the discussions were mostly respectful (less a few that were only capable of hurling insults or carpet bomb tweets). For instance, I disagree with merge and cern on many issues, but respected their POV. When we give up the forums to discuss like adults to the children, we've lost. And it's one of the reasons the traffic (and $$$) on this board has plummeted. Dan has done a great job upholding the standards on this board by locking threads, warning and cancelling members when necessary. Just do the same with LOTS and it'll be fine.
Go Giants!
Don’t forget, an old timer got banned for literally nothing.If LOTS would offload a fraction of the absolute garbage posts that have made this board unreadable, I'd be on board. Since Dan stepped back, the negative axe-grinders have ruled the day here. Clown show. The new sheriff laid down the law for a day, now it's NJ.com.
I'm out of the loop. What happened?Don’t forget, an old timer got banned for literally nothing.
What’s next, a guy gets wacked for wearing the wrong shoes?
Shu67 got banned for….what was it again?I'm out of the loop. What happened?
Shu 67 earned his punishment. Now after serving time away from the board he will be back soon .Shu67 got banned for….what was it again?
But what are you gonna do, JD is the boss, centuries of tradition here
On the contrary, we would have a place to confine all that garbage. I almost never looked at our old LOTS board, unless I clicked it accidentally on the drop-down, and thirty seconds of reading would be enough to commit to not making that mistake again. But it was off of this board, which is all I care about. Reading a thread here that involves complex or nuanced social issues is like watching people eat broth with chopsticks.The RU board is a complete cesspool, you don't want one.
This. I don't and won't, and that was always fine with me.First of all, if you don't care for a LOTS board, you don't have to read it or participate in it.
This is where your viewpoint doesn’t see the benefit of a LOTS board. People don’t want to discuss these issues with just anyone. They want to discuss it with members of the community. In this case the Seton Hall community. You have a built up desire with the members of the board who want to discuss these issues. Yes, some can be distasteful. But so what? Isn’t that the purpose of free speech? But u miss the value of discourse on topics to get counter point of views. I am sure I am not the only one who stopped paying due to this stand.Two things can be true. On3 told me I could only have one board, the pay board. I fought for the free board to stay, LOTS was too much and I’m fine with that because that content has no place here. You can go pretty much anywhere else on the internet to talk about those topics, don’t do it here. Stop hijacking threads, especially the mess that every wnba thread turns into. Threads that go sideways will continue to be locked.
You’re right. I don’t see the value so I’ll say it again, go anywhere else to talk about that junk. LOTS isn’t coming back.This is where your viewpoint doesn’t see the benefit of a LOTS board. People don’t want to discuss these issues with just anyone. They want to discuss it with members of the community. In this case the Seton Hall community. You have a built up desire with the members of the board who want to discuss these issues. Yes, some can be distasteful. But so what? Isn’t that the purpose of free speech? But u miss the value of discourse on topics to get counter point of views. I am sure I am not the only one who stopped paying due to this stand.
Btw, did you question it why Rutgers has such a board and we do not? Or did you not question it because your vision of this board lined up perfectly with what on3 wanted?
Here is an idea instead of locking a thread, actually be a message board administrator/moderator and censor displayed thought that you believe crosses the boundary of what the message board ethics and decorum isTwo things can be true. On3 told me I could only have one board, the pay board. I fought for the free board to stay, LOTS was too much and I’m fine with that because that content has no place here. You can go pretty much anywhere else on the internet to talk about those topics, don’t do it here. Stop hijacking threads, especially the mess that every wnba thread turns into. Threads that go sideways will continue to be locked.
I guess I have a different view.
First of all, if you don't care for a LOTS board, you don't have to read it or participate in it.
Second, the RU CE Board is a cesspool, but it's always been a cesspool...even their MBB and MFB forums are awful, but that's on the moderators. There are no rules and I almost think they encourage the behavior.
Third, I agree the extremes on both sides take the air out of the room in politics, the MSM and social media. But does that mean that you give up on finding balanced sources or discuss differences (or learn from each other?). I'm not interested in being the victim to extremes.
There are balanced and moderate news sources (like Axios or NewsNation), or you can use that $1,000 computer we have in our pockets get our news. I go back to LOTS and felt there were a wide spectrum of views and opinions and the discussions were mostly respectful (less a few that were only capable of hurling insults or carpet bomb tweets). For instance, I disagree with merge and cern on many issues, but respected their POV. When we give up the forums to discuss like adults to the children, we've lost. And it's one of the reasons the traffic (and $$$) on this board has plummeted. Dan has done a great job upholding the standards on this board by locking threads, warning and cancelling members when necessary. Just do the same with LOTS and it'll be fine.
Go Giants!
I'm perfectly aligned with that, but since that sewage (and lots of other general shitposting) tends to seep into this space, I also wouldn't be opposed to that kind of board here. But I get it.Two things can be true. On3 told me I could only have one board, the pay board. I fought for the free board to stay, LOTS was too much and I’m fine with that because that content has no place here. You can go pretty much anywhere else on the internet to talk about those topics, don’t do it here. Stop hijacking threads, especially the mess that every wnba thread turns into. Threads that go sideways will continue to be locked.
Great post and I will take it one step further. Not only is that a community but in many ways it was a trusted community. There were posters I ended up meeting at games, continued our discussions via email or phone, even looked at opportunities and did business with some. Great way to advance the depth, relationships, and leverage using the Seton Hall community. That’s a bond we all shared….SHU. I would’ve never known with some of these guys did outside of basketball unless it was for LOTS. That’s all gone and you will never get it back.This is where your viewpoint doesn’t see the benefit of a LOTS board. People don’t want to discuss these issues with just anyone. They want to discuss it with members of the community. In this case the Seton Hall community. You have a built up desire with the members of the board who want to discuss these issues. Yes, some can be distasteful. But so what? Isn’t that the purpose of free speech? But u miss the value of discourse on topics to get counter point of views. I am sure I am not the only one who stopped paying due to this stand.
Btw, did you question it why Rutgers has such a board and we do not? Or did you not question it because your vision of this board lined up perfectly with what on3 wanted?
This offers the least path of resistance, is already there, and is easily findable.Or just start one on an existing discussion site like Reddit.
Probably good idea, but I am not sure that would solve problem here about hijacking threads, the beauty of the LOTS is people here are engaged and all on the same site and if topics that get out of hand or about to get out of hand could be moved to LOTS easily be admins.This offers the least path of resistance, is already there, and is easily findable.
A job lmao? What is his hourly wage here? Come on the pay site is peanutsGreat post and I will take it one step further. Not only is that a community but in many ways it was a trusted community. There were posters I ended up meeting at games, continued our discussions via email or phone, even looked at opportunities and did business with some. Great way to advance the depth, relationships, and leverage using the Seton Hall community. That’s a bond we all shared….SHU. I would’ve never known with some of these guys did outside of basketball unless it was for LOTS. That’s all gone and you will never get it back.
And without a trusted community, you are just a message board. You’re dead in the water.
This board is not a passion of J.D. like it was for Dan. It’s a job…. I get it. Traffic and paying members are down considerably because it’s been reduced to a monolithic message board. He doesn’t even care about the customers. Great job.
OK, it's not a job, but he is treating it like a chore. He obviously doesn't care about increasing traffic or revenue.A job lmao? What is his hourly wage here? Come on the pay site is peanuts
I don't disagree.Probably good idea, but I am not sure that would solve problem here about hijacking threads, the beauty of the LOTS is people here are engaged and all on the same site and if topics that get out of hand or about to get out of hand could be moved to LOTS easily be admins.
You had phone conversations and did business with people you had no prior connection to just because of LOTS?Great post and I will take it one step further. Not only is that a community but in many ways it was a trusted community. There were posters I ended up meeting at games, continued our discussions via email or phone, even looked at opportunities and did business with some. Great way to advance the depth, relationships, and leverage using the Seton Hall community. That’s a bond we all shared….SHU. I would’ve never known with some of these guys did outside of basketball unless it was for LOTS. That’s all gone and you will never get it back.
And without a trusted community, you are just a message board. You’re dead in the water.
This board is not a passion of J.D. like it was for Dan. It’s a job…. I get it. Traffic and paying members are down considerably because it’s been reduced to a monolithic message board. He doesn’t even care about the customers. Great job.
Desperately need @knowknow to chime in right now.You had phone conversations and did business with people you had no prior connection to just because of LOTS?
This comment is a joke and I would not expect anything else from you.A job lmao? What is his hourly wage here? Come on the pay site is peanuts
When you were editor and chief and head moderator did the amount of paid subscribers ever influence what you did or did not provide on that site known as trovr. I will be generous and say if 200-300 people cared about any summer workout in any era of this program it would be a lot.This comment is a joke and I would not expect anything else from you.
The Trove broke a ton of news this offseason, had interviews with Felt, Carino, Popkin and others.
Constantly broke news regarding summer workouts which I saw nowhere else.
If that's not worth $10.00 a month in the offseason then you have a choice instead of criticizing the hard work done on the Trove.
Nope did not change my tune. Perhaps peanuts was not properly explained. Let me add the context...it is less of a cost by month and annually than many other subscriptions. More it was a reply to hall85 and his line of disagreement with JD and JD's prior post.You are changing your tune. The Trove is not peanuts as you stated. It encompasses hard work to get any info in the offseason. It does the same when talking about portal commitments and setting up interviews.
And as for money earned. My pay this spring, summer and fall was the same as yours.
Rivals
4-star PG Javion Tyndale commits to Seton Hall
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
4-star PG Javion Tyndale down to 6 schools
Women's Sports
Highly-recruited 2027 prospect Ava Womack breaks down recruitment
Women's Sports
Highly-recruited 2027 prospect Eni Oyedeji breaks down recruitment
On3 Basketball
LMU transfer guard Rodney Brown Jr. commits to Seton Hall