So I'm confused how pointing out pivotal points to the game are classified as "excuses". GW turned the ball over against Galax, a lot. Did some of that have to do with Galax, of course. Did some of that have to do with sloppy play by GW, of course. If GW doesn't turn the ball over as much, they should beat Galax. If Galax beats them AGAIN, all you can do is tip your hat and say good game. All I'm doing is giving my opinion on who is the best in the West. Nothing more, nothing less.
Enough with dissecting every post Fort, you're making my alma mater look bad.