Chris Carlin Tweet..Get in Seats EARLY

knight90

Sophomore
Jun 22, 2009
444
136
0
Legrand has been working with new technology where his mind can control his muscles ... He is going to lead the team out, then stand and walk a step at the coin toss ... Using the new technology. Brain Waves via a computer to contract the muscles needed to walk. Worst case he stands on his own.

is this just a guess?
 

demauroj

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2004
42,545
1,941
0
Dmitri Vegas , Like Mike & Unmet Ozcan - do The Hum for the Scarlet Knights warm ups.

Dmitri Vegas is currently on Tour in London, so this is not it. Not a fan of him, just did a google search.
I though that would be pretty cool.
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
120,341
53,124
113
Fair enough. I was just trying to explain the pic I can't post. I thought it was a good turn out at the time which is why I took it to text it to someone who couldn't make it.

Totally forgot I got a great pic of the student section during the MSU game! The ONLY seats that were empty aren't in the picture (maybe 100/150 or so, Section 132, at the top of the section and just out of frame...everything IN frame in that end zone, plus a little more to the right - SW corner 1 section, it looks like - is "student" seating).

That being said it's about time students were given some of the seats, formerly used so the band could "spread out" and appear bigger, back. Looks like a good 5 rows or so, at the top of the band, didn't go unused this time around. Kudos to all involved!


 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redking

RUTrack94

All-American
Nov 15, 2008
11,349
5,178
113
I am joshing everyone ... It would be sweet if Eric was in the group trying this out with Big Idea, but that is not the case from what I read ... Imagine how loud and rocking high point would be if Eric did that at the coin toss, or better yet waited to stand up when teams line up for the kickoff!!!
 
Nov 10, 2003
11,777
3,298
0
Legrand has been working with new technology where his mind can control his muscles ... He is going to lead the team out, then stand and walk a step at the coin toss ... Using the new technology. Brain Waves via a computer to contract the muscles needed to walk. Worst case he stands on his own.
If this is true, it will be an amazing thing to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colonel_rutgers

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
If the stealth bomber flys over will we even know it?

They are actually pretty impressive in a creepy other worldly sort of way.

Trivia question for you - what purpose do the F-16s (or other fighters) serve in a flyover scenario?
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
Trivia question for you - what purpose do the F-16s (or other fighters) serve in a flyover scenario?
They provide a radar signal to other aircraft in the area that wouldn't otherwise know about the stealth aircraft? I mean, for a flyover like this. In a true military op, I would guess the non-stealth aircraft wouldn't be there.
 

srru86

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
17,877
4,199
113
They provide a radar signal to other aircraft in the area that wouldn't otherwise know about the stealth aircraft? I mean, for a flyover like this. In a true military op, I would guess the non-stealth aircraft wouldn't be there.
Don't know but that is a good theory.
And I thought it was the fighter jocks won't ever let the bomber boys have the spotlight to themselves.
 

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
They provide a radar signal to other aircraft in the area that wouldn't otherwise know about the stealth aircraft? I mean, for a flyover like this. In a true military op, I would guess the non-stealth aircraft wouldn't be there.

Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.
 

rube1859

Sophomore
Sep 13, 2006
224
110
0
Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.

Interesting...never knew that and I am a huge aviation enthusiast.
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,816
0
Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.
damn it...couldn't you have waited for a few more guesses. That (the 2nd part) was mine LOL!
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.
I thought my guess was a little weak in that I couldn't think of a scenario whereby air traffic control wouldn't be keeping all other aircraft away from the flyby anyway so the whole lack of radar signature wouldn't be a huge factor. But it was all I could think of.

Didn't even think about the lack of noise.
 

m1ipabrams

All-American
Apr 15, 2007
7,055
8,740
0
Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.

Not sure I buy the first reason. B-2s have done solo passes at airshows(they did in AC back a few years ago), so its not like there aren't opportunities to see how quiet they are. And they are indeed quiet, for the AC airshow we didn't hear the B2 at all until it was directly overhead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Njcanesfan

srru86

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
17,877
4,199
113
Close. They provide a sound signature to mask that of the B-2 - or, more precisely, the lack of that of the B-2.

It's done for two reasons... first is the obvious "we don't really want anyone to know how quiet it really is" and the second is because absent the noise from the fighters, a B-2 flyover would be about as exciting (and about as noticeable) as a pigeon flyover.
I assumed they have a transponder they can turn on to squawk ATC when flying in non-tactical mode?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Njcanesfan

RUbot

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2002
1,318
1,394
113
I thought it was pretty awesome when Rutgers Stadium hosted the pregame flyover by that Armada of Helicopters. Cant recall which game it was.. perhaps Michigan State in 2004?? Whenever it was.. it was impressive. Had a few blackhawks and several large Chinooks if I remember correctly. In my opinion the copter flyovers are more impressive... spend more time over the stadium and can be lower and are nice and loud. Impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ipabrams

Njcanesfan

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2005
2,348
2,413
113
Don't know but that is a good theory.
And I thought it was the fighter jocks won't ever let the bomber boys have the spotlight to themselves.
Being an Air Force Air Traffic Controller, there's so many things I would like to answer about stealth technology....but........If I told you, I'd have to kill you. Lets just say, when they are flying in a friendly environment, they are not at all stealth.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
Being an Air Force Air Traffic Controller, there's so many things I would like to answer about stealth technology....but........If I told you, I'd have to kill you. Lets just say, when they are flying in a friendly environment, they are not at all stealth.
So my theory was all wrong. But I was definitely correct about the hookers and blow. First 500 in the stadium. Don't miss out!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Njcanesfan

Njcanesfan

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2005
2,348
2,413
113
Not sure I buy the first reason. B-2s have done solo passes at airshows(they did in AC back a few years ago), so its not like there aren't opportunities to see how quiet they are. And they are indeed quiet, for the AC airshow we didn't hear the B2 at all until it was directly overhead.
This is correct, so I don't know about that theory of hiding the sound. In fact, the sound, or lack thereof of a B2 approaching is one of the big "features" at air shows like you said.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,054
24,669
113
I am joshing everyone ... It would be sweet if Eric was in the group trying this out with Big Idea, but that is not the case from what I read ... Imagine how loud and rocking high point would be if Eric did that at the coin toss, or better yet waited to stand up when teams line up for the kickoff!!!
------------
in poor taste, dude....
 

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
I assumed they have a transponder they can turn on to squawk ATC when flying in non-tactical mode?

All aircraft have transponders, so yes. And air traffic radar systems don't use "search mode" as a rule, anyway. It's why the 9/11 planes effectively disappeared from view once the transponders were turned off.
 

ArminRU

Heisman
Aug 5, 2008
11,350
12,978
0
If this truly is it..and Rutgers doesn't HYPE this anymore than "be in your seats early"..shame on them.

No way this is true.

Are you people this gullible? The original post is kinda messed up if you ask me, but that's another story