@JayDogSmooth you should be happy to see this development if it comes to pass. You know I've not believed it possible but I have to say I can possibly see a glimmer of hope here maybe if you're FSU.
Have to give you credit, you didn't know the hows or what avenue it was going to be but you were confident and I can actually see it now as possibility.
I wish Rutgers cared more about athleticsisn't a shame that RU doesn't have a singular vision on athletics the way others do
You wanted people to say I'm wrong well I'll say I'm wrong.Yeah, all I was told was that it would be 2 to 3 years, and there was various avenues. They were exploring, but that they were extremely confident that it would get done.
Because essentially, they did not have a choice if they wanted to compete at a high-level moving forward
Lol honestly, it’s not about who’s right and wrong, I literally just went by what I heard from guys were more connected and I amYou wanted people to say I'm wrong well I'll say I'm wrong.
I'm not saying you're going to get out of the GOR for sure but I can actually see a possible light at the end of the tunnel. Whether that's freedom or a train I don't know lol but before I only saw the train haha.
It DID.. you have to back to think about it. ACC had all these bowl deals and the bowl committees were getting upset that none of the ACC teams were highly ranked.. then they added FSU which was often in the MNC mix. And when FSU sank to the typical ACC level they added Miami and while Miami did not win enough to make a difference from that point forward, its past seasons counted toward the ACC keeping its AQ status as there was some rule, that had targeted the raided Big East conference, but applied more to the ACC than the Big East. That BCS rule was that if a conference champ, 4 years in a row, was not Top 12 (12? 15?) then the conference lost its AQ status.FSU hasn’t delivered for the ACC. So there’s that argument
The narrative of them not delivering is beyond stupidIt DID.. you have to back to think about it. ACC had all these bowl deals and the bowl committees were getting upset that none of the ACC teams were highly ranked.. then they added FSU which was often in the MNC mix. And when FSU sank to the typical ACC level they added Miami and while Miami did not win enough to make a difference from that point forward, its past seasons counted toward the ACC keeping its AQ status as there was some rule, that had targeted the raided Big East conference, but applied more to the ACC than the Big East. That BCS rule was that if a conference champ, 4 years in a row, was not Top 12 (12? 15?) then the conference lost its AQ status.
In short, adding FSU gave the ACC a good decade where contemplation of such a rule would never apply to them.
Well. at some point FSU football melded back into the mediocrity that is ACC football... until Dabo brought Clemson back. But, yeah, FSU has a storied football rep that they brought to the ACC. The ACC definitely benefitted.The narrative of them not delivering is beyond stupid
Last 7 years have been tough but last year was goodWell. at some point FSU football melded back into the mediocrity that is ACC football... until Dabo brought Clemson back. But, yeah, FSU has a storied football rep that they brought to the ACC. The ACC definitely benefitted.
Gene dropping bombs
Gene and Ira usually never make direct statements, they generally talk around a question and speak like a politicianThat guy puts out all kinds of stuff. He throws literally anything and everything against the wall.
Stick with reliable mainstream CFB reporters or at least guys like your Nee who report on these fan sites. Much better chance of accurate info.
I think there’s a shot for you now but who knows timetables and I’m sure the ACC will fight it.
Nah he puts out lots of stuff and has changed his name a few times too. I haven’t bothered looking at his stuff in forever because it’s just junk in years.Gene and Ira usually never make direct statements, they generally talk around a question and speak like a politician
The fact that he’s on record and putting his reputation out there, like Nee did last week, is pretty telling
Every time I’ve heard him talk, he basically says nothing and acts like he knows everythingNah he puts out lots of stuff and has changed his name a few times too. I haven’t bothered looking at his stuff in forever because it’s just junk in years.
Your contacts at FSU and FSU fan sites like this and CFB media are better sources. This guy is just an attention seeker and at best a broken clock.
In recent years, it seems like every time we heard about a shake-up in a conference it happened. I'd be surprised if nothing happens this time.I’m surprised no talk in this thread in a week. The ACC deadline to leave in 2024 is Tuesday. Obviously FSU wants out asap.
Have they aligned everything to handle the insanely huge GOR issue? Or do they need to continue working on it and they don’t get out until 2025?
I like knowing in a few days for certain.
I've heard no announcement this year, but next year they'll make one and be out by 2025I’m surprised no talk in this thread in a week. The ACC deadline to leave in 2024 is Tuesday. Obviously FSU wants out asap.
Have they aligned everything to handle the insanely huge GOR issue? Or do they need to continue working on it and they don’t get out until 2025?
I like knowing in a few days for certain.
And I assume at this point they’d be heading to the big ten? Seems like they’re interested in going national and getting out of the UF shadow.I've heard no announcement this year, but next year they'll make one and be out by 2025
Admin overwhelmingly wants B1G, most Boosters / fans want SECAnd I assume at this point they’d be heading to the big ten? Seems like they’re interested in going national and getting out of the UF shadow.
They'll be in one of the 2 conferencesSEC doesn't want then-----doesn't appear as though they think they need them.
Ditto Clemson
I cannot see the Big Ten taking either of them . They don't fit the Big Ten model.
FSU might have a big roadblock in the Gators fighting their invite.They'll be in one of the 2 conferences
Hard to see the SEC letting the B1G into FL and SC
Noles definitely fit into the B1G model
Clemson is iffy
UF sponsored them in the early 90's, before that though they blocked them at least onceFSU might have a big roadblock in the Gators fighting their invite.
Clemson might have South Carolina opposing them, but the opposition might not be strong enough to stop it now.
I heard, but can't say true, Florida was totally against FSU joining and South Carolina wanted no part of Clemson being in the SEC
I could see the B1G wanting a presence in Florida and FSU would make a great addition.
Clemson might be a good get , but might not meet the requirements for that most B1G schools want and that could leave them out in cold if the ACC folds.
Personalty , without one bit of creditable info backing it, I feel Notre Dame
isn't too happy with the ACC over the vote keeping Cal and Stanford out and won't lift a finger to help keep the conference together and might like the idea of if the ACC goes kaput they won't be obligated to play 4-5 ACC teams a year because their other sports are ACC members.
not getting their own way is right, but from what I could see is that even though they are independent in football they are locked in to playing ACC teams 4-5 games a year and the ACC breaking up would end that.UF sponsored them in the early 90's, before that though they blocked them at least once
Their was the alledged gentelemen's agreement w/UF, USC etc to block FSU & Clemson - not sure on validity of that though
Agree ND doesn't like it b/c they were the ones vouching for them. To which nobody gives a damn what ND likes and doesn't like, as ND is out for ND, always has been and always will be
And truthfully, I don't blame ND as their brand is what it is b/c of their independance and past success, which has led them to have the ability to dictate terms
This time though, for once, they're not getting their way
They're always looking out for themselvesnot getting their own way is right, but from what I could see is that even though they are independent in football they are locked in to playing ACC teams 4-5 games a year and the ACC breaking up would end that.
Also, because of others sports and football commiment thy would pay a hefty fee to leave before the GOR expired or conference broke-up.
With being rejected now, if the time comes that Notre Dame can help keep the ACC together they might just remember their wish being shot down and
make the ACC pay dearly for their help or just walk away because of their wishes being refused and be free of the ACC football commitment while placing their other programs in a conference ( Big East?) .
Vote was 8-4----can't blame those in the least who voted against them.UF sponsored them in the early 90's, before that though they blocked them at least once
Their was the alledged gentelemen's agreement w/UF, USC etc to block FSU & Clemson - not sure on validity of that though
Agree ND doesn't like it b/c they were the ones vouching for them. To which nobody gives a damn what ND likes and doesn't like, as ND is out for ND, always has been and always will be
And truthfully, I don't blame ND as their brand is what it is b/c of their independance and past success, which has led them to have the ability to dictate terms
This time though, for once, they're not getting their way
I’m surprised no talk in this thread in a week. The ACC deadline to leave in 2024 is Tuesday. Obviously FSU wants out asap.
Have they aligned everything to handle the insanely huge GOR issue? Or do they need to continue working on it and they don’t get out until 2025?
I like knowing in a few days for certain.
Last 7 years have been tough but last year was good
Lost decade was tough as well even though we won the league a few times
FSU voted against themVote was 8-4----can't blame those in the least who voted against them.
In the 2 sports that write the checks in the ACC Stanford and Cal bring nothing.
They bring neither quality teams or viewers. Why would you want them ?
True but in fairness it's been Clemson and 13 dwarfsThey will need to pay close to 100 million and not have a home game televised for 10 years.
GOR is as solid as a rock-----they signed it. No one put a gun to their head.
Exit fee is 120 mil - money already raisedThey will need to pay close to 100 million and not have a home game televised for 10 years.
GOR is as solid as a rock-----they signed it. No one put a gun to their head.
ESPN "advised" ACC on various expansions.. they had teh ACC management in their pocket all this time and got that GOR and how did that serve the ACC members? Disney/ABC/ESPN will end up having been poison to the ACC.Exit fee is 120 mil - money already raised
GOR who knows - estimates have ranged from 300 mil - 900 mil - combo of boosters, liquidating assets and JPM taking care of that
Mark my words, we'll be out by 2025
No disagreement hereESPN "advised" ACC on various expansions.. they had teh ACC management in their pocket all this time and got that GOR and how did that serve the ACC members? Disney/ABC/ESPN will end up having been poison to the ACC.
True but in fairness it's been Clemson and 13 dwarfs
Before that it was all FSU
Oh come on.. you see where the ACC is now and where the Big Ten is. The depth issue is no contest. Are you that defensive regarding your Fightin' Irish? Are you nervous? You need not be. Come on into the Big Ten.. just do it.And prior to last season the Big Ten has been the Buckeyes and who ?
Both leagues are top heavyAnd prior to last season the Big Ten has been the Buckeyes and who ?