I'm currently trying to come up with an appropriate punishment and I have a few ideas: 1)I post a pic of him holding a sign apologizing for being dumb here on this thread or 2) He joins SPS and makes it known who he is so you guys can keep correcting him for being dumb.The nephew excuse. If I've seen it once - I've seen it a thousand times.
For what its worth I disagree with the entire premise of adding new field level club seats. The designs are flawed and I agree that it will cause all kinds of issues when cups full of liquid are tossed on these people. They need to save the money and do something else entirely.I'm really puzzled by the logic.. They're about to bowl in their north endzone and it recently came to light they've deleted the suites on top to save money. Has that change been reversed?
Because if it hasn't.. and they still plan on a 1970's style bowl in the north endzone... Why on earth would you gut the south endzone, take away a valuable area from everyone in the bleachers there and add 30 suites? Why not simply put them on the north endzone next year? AECOM's estimating department has already been calling everybody and their brother getting cost estimates on that addition.
I'm currently trying to come up with an appropriate punishment and I have a few ideas: 1)I post a pic of him holding a sign apologizing for being dumb here on this thread or 2) He joins SPS and makes it known who he is so you guys can keep correcting him for being dumb.
I'm currently trying to come up with an appropriate punishment and I have a few ideas: 1)I post a pic of him holding a sign apologizing for being dumb here on this thread or 2) He joins SPS and makes it known who he is so you guys can keep correcting him for being dumb.
I'm really puzzled by the logic.. They're about to bowl in their north endzone and it recently came to light they've deleted the suites on top to save money. Has that change been reversed?
Because if it hasn't.. and they still plan on a 1970's style bowl in the north endzone... Why on earth would you gut the south endzone, take away a valuable area from everyone in the bleachers there and add 30 suites? Why not simply put them on the north endzone next year? AECOM's estimating department has already been calling everybody and their brother getting cost estimates on that addition.
Why would Vaught Hemingway NEED 10,000 more seats? You can't even fill up what you've got now.
The redesigned north endzone that came out under a year ago did not have premium seating. It's really horrible looking.
http://www.olemisssports.com/sports/umaaf/forward-together/campaign-details.html
![]()
I'm currently trying to come up with an appropriate punishment and I have a few ideas
I would be willing to bet a north endzone expansion will involve mostly premium seating.
This is the real Red87 posting. My nephew has been banned from my computer for good. Again, I'm sorry for the idiocy earlier guys.is this the nephew speaking again or the uncle? this can get really confusing if you dont clarify every post.
From an outsiders perspective, it seems the important issue SHOULD be increased revenue (premium seats) and NOT capacity. That stadium is currently big enough... Adding only capacity doesn't make much sense... I guess they will convert the north EZ to students and renovate the south?
Last season we filled the stadium to an average of 98 % for each home game. We averaged 59,000 per game.http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/2013/sec-football-attendance-2013/
Its somewhere around 4-5 thousand with the bleachers they have right now. As for the capacity of VHS when its all said and done, I imagine it will be somewhere around 66,000 once the endzone is bowled in. In 2002 they added 10,003 seats with the expansion but that has all of the club and upper level seats factored in. I'm not sure they will do the same for the other side.question for the bear lurkers......what is the capacity of the current NORTH endzone that has the temporary bleachers? i ask because it is a pretty large section and if you bowl it off like this:
![]()
you wont be adding many seats at all because the current bleachers are pretty large as far as temporary seating goes.
![]()
in the pic above, you would just be adding seating enough to close up the open areas, which isnt that large of a space. as you already know, because of the of location of those newly built academic support buildings, you would not be able to advance the stadium taller without the removal of a building or two. for the endzones to be symmetrical, you would be required to demolish newly built buildings.
anywho, im curious what the current capacity is on the north endzone because it looks far more substantial than the one we had.
Its somewhere around 4-5 thousand with the bleachers they have right now. As for the capacity of VHS when its all said and done, I imagine it will be somewhere around 66,000 once the endzone is bowled in. In 2002 they added 10,003 seats with the expansion but that has all of the club and upper level seats factored in. I'm not sure they will do the same for the other side.
That would be a dick move on our part if that's true. If we do that I hope it isn't just to one up MSU.From looking at the pics of the design, no way you can go to 66K.
You are at 60,580 now and we are going to 61,337. I predict your new capacity will be just over 62,000.
Agreed, grass is where its at.So Ole Miss is going to expand on their stadium yet they still haven't fixed the worst part about VHS. The terrible astroturf.
Their stadium looks like ****. It looks like they took a trailer and built a huge, fancy deck on the front of it. I know that we have some things that don't match aesthetically, but at least there's some flow to it. What they have is just turrible.
I think that's why they are expanding premium seating in the south endzone. They don't have room in the North unless they tear down those buildings that were built in 2005.