Yes, the defensive coaching was not good in those games.
Wasn't good during Brown's tenure either when WVU gave up 42 to ISU last year, or 34 to a third or fourth string QB from Texas Tech. Wasn't good in 2019 when Brown's team gave up 38 to Missouri, 42 to Texas, 38 to ISU, 52 to Oklahoma in consecutive weeks, and 38 to Texas Tech a couple games later.
Wasn't good when Browns WVU had 5 straight losses either.
But when you only focus on the previous coaches misteps I guess you can ignore those sorts of things.
BTW who really believes Brown wouldn't have given up 50 + against OU last year? Luckily the game was cancelled. Difference with DH, his team also SCORED 41 against @OK State and 45 against playoff bound OU in narrow losses.
You and I have had this discussion before.
You act as if Holgerson's defenses giving up major points was an anomaly. You want to hold Brown to a higher standard than what you held Dana. Completely wrong for you to do that.
You set the standard at 27 points in our last conversation.
Let's get to the numbers, as they say.
1) Brown, in two years, already has half the number of bowl wins as Dana did in 8 years. With weeks to prepare, results show that Dana was ill-equipped to beat a team. One big bowl win, in his first year, (Clemson) wasn't enough to help him keep his job.
2) Holgerson's offenses were, on the average, pretty good most years. For every not so good year there was a great year.
3) Yet, his defenses were just plain awful - year after year.
So, using the standard of 27 points per game (roughly giving up a TD a quarter), Holgerson's defenses gave up more than 27 points per game :
2011 - 5 times (10-3 and Orange Bowl win)
2012 - 9 times ( 7-6 Generally considered the worst WVU defense in recent history)
2013 - 8 times (4-8)
2014 - 8 times (7-6)
2015 - 5 times (8-5 and Cactus Bowl win)
2016 - 4 times (10-3)
2017 - 9 times (7-6)
2018 - 6 times (8-4)
All together, a total of 54 times in 8 years.
This is why Dana isn't still the coach at WVU - he couldn't coach, or bring in one, a defense worthy of winning anything big. Almosts, a few points here or there, etc. etc. obviously didn't cut it. Usually Dana against FBS opponents, had narrow wins and blowout losses.
(These numbers may be off @ 1-2 per year as they do not account for scoop and scores or pick 6's. However, same would also apply to offensive scores so they reasonably would even out)