Not when they were #1 team in country looking invincible. They beat them after they started to look mortalIndiana also won at Purdue
Not when they were #1 team in country looking invincible. They beat them after they started to look mortalIndiana also won at Purdue
They have no chance at 18-16.Bac …forget the metrics a little
Nebraska is 16-15 against a schedule with 26 power 5 teams and Memphis
Makes no difference.Not when they were #1 team in country looking invincible. They beat them after they started to look mortal
Did I miss something? No one saying Nebraska in. Obviously. But damn dangerous in conference tournament.They have no chance at 18-16.
That is simply not true. It’s the most important ranking tool for entry into dance…you are listening too much to BAC who always comes on here making a reason why we are out of tournamentNET really is not very important.
Not when they were #1 team in country looking invincible. They beat them after they started to look mortal
That is simply not true. It’s the most important ranking tool for entry into dance…you are listening too much to BAC who always comes on here making a reason why we are out of tournament
It makes a difference when I say Rutgers has the best win in conference and Bac chimes in Indiana beat them tooMakes no difference.
It makes a difference when I say Rutgers has the best win in conference and Bac chimes in Indiana beat them too
It’s relevant to back up my statement that Rutgers has best win in conferenceThat is irrelevant to the committee
What? Seems like BAC making case we could still get in today even with loss and the PSU win. I for one think all hope lost with loss today.No its not..its a sorting tool to be used as a guide
It’s relevant to back up my statement that Rutgers has best win in conference
What? Seems like he BAC making case we could still get in today even with lose and the PSU win. I for one thing all hope lost with loss today.
Aren't you saying Rutgers can still get a bid with loss today?Who?
So which ranking system is more importantNo its not..its a sorting tool to be used as a guide
The post I replied to was edited I think.. the original said something about them having a better resume than Michigan.Conference play could even affect
Did I miss something? No one saying Nebraska in. Obviously. But damn dangerous in conference tournament.
It's not about what Bac says, I actually checked last season and NET was not very correlated at all with the seeding. Kenpom, Bart, my own personal ranking, Massey rating were all more correlated. I'm not going to say being ahead of another team in NET is completely meaningless but it's really waaay down the list of criteria.That is simply not true. It’s the most important ranking tool for entry into dance…you are listening too much to BAC who always comes on here making a reason why we are out of tournament
Aren't you saying Rutgers can still get a bid with loss today?
So which ranking system is more important
I said nothing about seedThe post I replied to was edited I think.. the original said something about them having a better resume than Michigan.
It's not about what Bac says, I actually checked last season and NET was not very correlated at all with the seeding. Kenpom, Bart, my own personal ranking, Massey rating were all more correlated. I'm not going to say being ahead of another team in NET is completely meaningless but it's really waaay down the list of criteria.
i didn’t say anything about NET used for seeding. I said it was number 1 matrix used to pick field and every team in top 35 of NET made danceThe post I replied to was edited I think.. the original said something about them having a better resume than Michigan.
It's not about what Bac says, I actually checked last season and NET was not very correlated at all with the seeding. Kenpom, Bart, my own personal ranking, Massey rating were all more correlated. I'm not going to say being ahead of another team in NET is completely meaningless but it's really waaay down the list of criteria.
Exactly what I said. Every team in top 35 made danceMany things considered
None of the ranking system matter much..the Net matters most of those ranking systems
Basically same thing, it’s a ranking and if you are below a certain point you don’t make it.I said nothing about seed
It’s hard to be top 35 in NET while having a bad resume. That doesn’t mean the good NET is what is causing them to be selected.i didn’t say anything about NET used for seeding. I said it was number 1 matrix used to pick field and every team in top 35 of NET made dance
If all you are saying is it’s the most important computer metric.. then sure agreed. But it’s still not very important.Exactly what I said. Every team in top 35 made dance
The fact that the top 35 from last year made the tournament will comfort me that our chances are still pretty good plus our large number of Quad winsIf all you are saying is it’s the most important computer metric.. then sure agreed. But it’s still not very important.
We’re not in the top 35 currently. If we are in the top 35 on selection Sunday it will mean we definitely have one more win and maybe two.The fact that the top 35 from last year made the tournament will comfort me that our chances are still pretty good plus our large number of Quad wins
If we lose next 2, how far you think our NET would drop?We’re not in the top 35 currently. If we are in the top 35 on selection Sunday it will mean we definitely have one more win and maybe two.
It’s really dependent on margin. If we lost two close games to Northwestern probably not all that far but at least into the 40sIf we lose next 2, how far you think our NET would drop?
Nobody who was in top 45 last year with a road win over the top team in country was left outWe’re not in the top 35 currently. If we are in the top 35 on selection Sunday it will mean we definitely have one more win and maybe two.
We get it. There are many criteria that go into it though not just NETNobody who was in top 45 last year with a road win over the top team in country was left out
That’s, um, pretty specific criteria. What’s your point?Nobody who was in top 45 last year with a road win over the top team in country was left out
My point is that our resume is still most likely to get in but a win tonight will clinch itThat’s, um, pretty specific criteria. What’s your point?
If we finish 0-2 we might not be in the top 45 eitherMy point is that our resume is still most likely to get in but a win tonight will clinch it
No wayMy point is that our resume is still most likely to get in but a win tonight will clinch it
RU's biggest homer strikes againWe get it. There are many criteria that go into it though not just NET
Scangg, Rutgers gets in without winning another game. C'mon dog. Get serious already.If we lose next 2, how far you think our NET would drop?
Our resume is better than last year and this year appears to have less bubble competitionNo way
Just git r done tonightWhatever.. hopefully it’s an argument that can never get settled
You have incorrect data20th in Kenpom, no sub-Q2 losses, and an 18-point neutral site win against Miami.
Good luck tonight, will be pulling for y’all for our matchup sake.
About Maryland? I do not lolYou have incorrect data