Weak article . Rutgers got the lowest grade - a B - , they need to grade on a curve
Sorry second lowest . No , I am saying that there needs to be more distribution in the grades.Indiana got a C-. Rutgers with 3 or 4 others at B-. You were expecting Ohio State to get a B?
No they don't. They don't curve the final standings in December.Weak article . Rutgers with the second lowest grade - a B - , they need to grade on a curve
Weak article . Rutgers with the second lowest grade - a B - , they need to grade on a curve
I would also say that the condition of the program should be considered. Since we had a weak recruiting class last year and not a lot of success, we should have gotten a higher grade for trending upward after a crap year.Sorry second lowest . No , I am saying that there needs to be more distribution in the grades.
Disagree. We should not be evaluated against expectations, be they our own or someone else's. We should be evaluated against the 13 (soon 15) teams we play.I would also say that the condition of the program should be considered. Since we had a weak recruiting class last year and not a lot of success, we should have gotten a higher grade for trending upward after a crap year.
To me, that's what the overall rankings are for, a clean comparison to the other teams in league. The letter grades should be more of a reflection of the team only and that should include past data and results.Disagree. We should not be evaluated against expectations, be they our own or someone else's. We should be evaluated against the 13 (soon 15) teams we play.
"There is still some recruiting to be desired here, but I love the direction Schiano and his staff are going."Non-legendary reading comprehension. The last part of the final sentence says: I love the direction Schiano and his staff are going. The article also notes this is a top 25 recruiting class.
From the context he seems to be saying, “Rutgers should be recruiting better, but is headed in the right direction.”"There is still some recruiting to be desired here, but I love the direction Schiano and his staff are going."
What does the article's author mean by the first half of the quote?
Rutgers isn't recruiting to Rivals' star ranking like everyone else?
Rutgers isn't recruiting NJ?
RU Husky made a good point.From the context he seems to be saying, “Rutgers should be recruiting better, but is headed in the right direction.”
Much of the recruiting focus has moved outside of overrated NJ and that’s a good thing.
ExactlyDisagree. We should not be evaluated against expectations, be they our own or someone else's. We should be evaluated against the 13 (soon 15) teams we play.