Mike Williams

PirateBlue08

Junior
Jul 25, 2025
332
359
63
Well I don't think anyone predicted Mike Williams would be a starter in our first game. He looked good. Can shoot it a bit and just passed the overall eye test for a first look. I think we have three guards who might be somewhat overlapping and interchangeable with Staton-McCray, Williams, and Simpkins. All three seem pretty much even ability-wise after this limited sample size. Of course it remains to see if they will be effective against better competition. But having so many seemingly capable guards (in addition of course to Clark and even Parker), is a welcome change from last year. And a sophomore Felton as your third string PG/SG is much better than last year when we had a freshman Felton as your backup PG. If we had kept Dual on this team in any capacity I don't think I would have been able to tolerate watching for a second year in a row.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
Williams was being rewarded for his play in practice leading up to the game. I posted that last week on the Trove as was reported to me by someone close to the program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Khadeenfan

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,313
2,576
113
Well I don't think anyone predicted Mike Williams would be a starter in our first game. He looked good. Can shoot it a bit and just passed the overall eye test for a first look. I think we have three guards who might be somewhat overlapping and interchangeable with Staton-McCray, Williams, and Simpkins. All three seem pretty much even ability-wise after this limited sample size. Of course it remains to see if they will be effective against better competition. But having so many seemingly capable guards (in addition of course to Clark and even Parker), is a welcome change from last year. And a sophomore Felton as your third string PG/SG is much better than last year when we had a freshman Felton as your backup PG. If we had kept Dual on this team in any capacity I don't think I would have been able to tolerate watching for a second year in a row.
Simpkins looks like the most upside. He’s rangey and athletic, has a quick trigger too.
 

jklings99

Sophomore
Aug 3, 2025
225
129
43
I wasn’t surprised to see Williams start, but a lil shocked Simpkins only saw 18 mins. He was our best guard last night, imo. Parker (hope to be wrong) looks like he has the Middleton syndrome more name than game.
 

Hall84

Senior
May 23, 2023
331
451
63
Just 1 game but this would be an interesting group.

Budd
Williams
Simpkins
Dar
Hines
Replacing Williams with Fisher would be interesting also.
Really intrigued with Dar and he’s more of a 3 anyway.
 

jklings99

Sophomore
Aug 3, 2025
225
129
43
Oh I agree. I just don’t want to see Dar at the 4 plus Fisher is our best/2nd best player.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
Don't sleep on Dar. He has major potential and plays excellent defense. Very heady player.
Do we ever have anyone who isn’t characterized as playing excellent defense, lol? More then half of last years team had that label and we weren’t good on D. By my count basically everyone but Clark and Felton has gotten that label now.
 

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,365
2,500
113
Do we ever have anyone who isn’t characterized as playing excellent defense, lol? More then half of last years team had that label and we weren’t good on D. By my count basically everyone but Clark and Felton has gotten that label now.
Clark played good d last night. smart, fast footwork
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
Clark played good d last night. smart, fast footwork
Certainly seemed he wasn't a liability, but I don't know how the competition plays into that. All I know is that we tend to overhype our players defensive ability, because the way things are stated at times we should basically be Houston-level defense every year. Except we aren't.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
In this game by far.

BTW, an NBA scout after the game took notice and said that other than Hines he has the most to offer at the next level.
 

SPK145

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
1,126
2,477
113
Dar and Felton were the only 2 rated negatively defensively against St. Peter's while Payne and Felton were the only 2 rated negatively offensively.
 

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,365
2,500
113
Certainly seemed he wasn't a liability, but I don't know how the competition plays into that. All I know is that we tend to overhype our players defensive ability, because the way things are stated at times we should basically be Houston-level defense every year. Except we aren't.
cant take fans so seriously. some of the things that have been said, even by coaches, are so ridiculous i disciunt them the second i read them. yet they are cited here forever
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHall87

Fishjam

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2016
653
2,264
93
Dar and Felton were the only 2 rated negatively defensively against St. Peter's while Payne and Felton were the only 2 rated negatively offensively.
Payne had a negative offensive rating? Which metric was that?

Only negative offensive ratings should have been Felton and AJ Staton-McCray. AJSM shot 1 for 7 with 1 assist and 1 TO in 23 minutes for an 86.4 KenPom O-Rating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halldan

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
Payne had a negative offensive rating? Which metric was that?

Only negative offensive ratings should have been Felton and AJ Staton-McCray. AJSM shot 1 for 7 with 1 assist and 1 TO in 23 minutes for an 86.4 KenPom O-Rating.
No one who watched the game could have complained one bit about Payne's offensive performance. To do so is a joke. Metrics be damned.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
No one who watched the game could have complained one bit about Payne's offensive performance. To do so is a joke. Metrics be damned.
Admittedly, I don't know or follow the metrics as much as others here. And some I don't really understand, to be honest. But I agree with you. My eyes watching that game told me Payne was more than fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHU AL 84

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
Stats don't alway tell the story. But they did here. All anyone is talking about is Hines and to a degree understandably so. But this isn't too shabby either.

 
  • Like
Reactions: NIL BAD

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
298
256
63
Stats don't alway tell the story. But they did here. All anyone is talking about is Hines and to a degree understandably so. But this isn't too shabby either.

I thought Payne played well against St. Peters. Very active & much more athletic than I imagined he'd be.

It would be interesting to see Payne & Hines on the court at the same time but you can see that both will be prone to foul trouble based on how active they are. With no back up center I just don't think we can risk it.

Rebounding will be an issue this year. You could already tell during the St. Peters game. Not having a legit PF for 2 years in a row now is disappointing.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
My guess despite what I was told about our 3 headed center (they would only play the 5) is that if any one of them plays the 4 it will be Godswell. He can defend better on the perimeter.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
My guess despite what I was told about our 3 headed center (they would only play the 5) is that if any one of them plays the 4 it will be Godswell. He can defend better on the perimeter.
I think we could see Payne and Hines playing together in Big East play at times. Prior to the year, I didn't think that would be a possibility. After watching SPU, they seemed athletic enough to possibly play together in the league. But I could also be clouded by how "athletic" they looked against a bad team like SPU, so jury out there.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,615
5,407
113
What I was told is none of the three has much of a game outside the paint. And for our style of play you do not want to clog the paint with two of them on the court at the same time.

Of course in a late game situation depending on need that might change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishjam

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
What I was told is none of the three has much of a game outside the paint. And for our style of play you do not want to clog the paint with two of them on the court at the same time.

Of course in a late game situation depending on need that might change.
That's a good point on clogging the lane, with the more "slashing" nature of our team. Though Budd looked good shooting from 3 last game, and we certainly have a few others. My thought was defensively and on the glass you may need that against certain Big East teams who have bigger 4s and 3s.
 

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
298
256
63
If Hines wants to play at the next level he'll need an outside game. If we don't help him with that aspect you can bet your *** another program will. His touch looks good.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,046
1,026
113
If Hines wants to play at the next level he'll need an outside game. If we don't help him with that aspect you can bet your *** another program will. His touch looks good.
Will be interesting to see how we play NC State, because in my mind I have visions of Will Wade and his "people" being on the phone with Hines people about 2 minutes after if that game doesn't go well.
 

PirateBlue08

Junior
Jul 25, 2025
332
359
63
Nice to see Budd hit two threes and look great on both. Our concern was him being a slightly better Kadary in terms of three point shooting but I think he could actually be a weapon from outside in spots. Must have really worked on his outside game over the summer.
 

SPK145

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
1,126
2,477
113
Will be interesting to see how we play NC State, because in my mind I have visions of Will Wade and his "people" being on the phone with Hines people about 2 minutes after if that game doesn't go well.
We already beat out Wade and NC State for him once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: setonball00