Military Strikes on Iran Imminent
- Thread starter PalmettoTiger1
- Start date
I bet you would along with doing the sucking
What war are we going n clown??
Of course he wants to watch men suck dick !! Mf wants to suck them also
You've elicited that very comment from females for your entire life. No wonder you decided to play for the other team.
I was wrong on the Iran situation. I thought Trump was bluffing and talking shi t like he always does. I thought he was going to come to an agreement no matter what and was just doing the art of the deal.
Boy was I wrong. What a ballsy attack. What a flex of American military strength. What a way to buck the system and do things a different way.
It will probably be years before we can accurately judge the outcome of today’s results.
I’m kind of stunned. A little in awe. But overall, I’m impressed so far. America is much stronger than even our enemies thought and Trump is not afraid to remind you.
Congrats to out Military for a job well done so far! Keep up the good work.
Boy was I wrong. What a ballsy attack. What a flex of American military strength. What a way to buck the system and do things a different way.
It will probably be years before we can accurately judge the outcome of today’s results.
I’m kind of stunned. A little in awe. But overall, I’m impressed so far. America is much stronger than even our enemies thought and Trump is not afraid to remind you.
Congrats to out Military for a job well done so far! Keep up the good work.
If this is true, how stupid were they? Every military action Trump has done recently has come on the weekend as to not interrupt the markets. What a bunch of bozos.
I'd pick the dog over you and the dog would be alive. It's also a far better and honest companion than you are. You're just another nasty and angry liberal. You're probably part of the Democrat Socialists of America. You slap someone? Lmao. How very tough guy of you. Slap. Ohhhhhhhhh. So scary.
That's not remotely true. The IAEA never had access to military sites, sky surveillance, or full access to facilities. Why y'all try to defend the Iranian regime is laughable. They have never been trustworthy.
They constantly called for Death To America!
The regime sucked. They called Trumps bluff and he toasted them.
I was not supportive of a war, and still am not. But Trump has stunned me and I totally support what has been done so far. He is single handily changing the game. Good or bad, only time will tell. But we are off to a good start.
Obama and Biden were Neville Chamberlain towards Iran. They wouldn't have done anything to Hitler either. Trump is Patton with the 3rd Army. This will be game changing for the world. Meanwhile, the Democratic Socialists of America, funded by a commie in China, are supporting Iran in a protest today. Mamdani is a member.
I didn’t think it could be done but this is the stupidest fvçking thing I’ve ever read on this website.
I thought of something similar..for all those who are "outaged, upset or whatever", how different would the world be had we taken out Hitler and leaders of the 3rd Reich before they invaded Europe?
It took 20 days for the US to effectively topple the existing Iraqi government in 2003 and Saddam was captured less than 9 months into the conflict and that war would go on to last another 8 years officially and the resulting power vacuum would precipitate another decade and a half of conflict between the rise of ISIL and the Syrian civil war.
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and had deposed central Taliban authority and established an interim government with Kharzai by December. From October to March, the US sustained only 12 casualties to the 15,000+ suffered by Taliban fighters. That war would go on to last an additional 19 years.
The Iranian regime isn’t just the Iyatollah. It’s a substantial hierarchy of clerics. Cut off the head and the next successor will move up in line. Cut down further along the hierarchy and you create a larger number of co-equals contending for legitimacy and created opportunity for sectarian violence. The regime isn’t propped up by nothing, the IRGC, who’s charter is explicitly not to protect Iranian sovereignty but rather as the Ordo militant of the state religion, is well armed and either ideologically or opportunistically devoted to the sustainment of the current Iranian paradigm and will either coalesce to form the strongest faction in the coming sectarian violence or will fracture into multiple smaller paramilitary groups that will increase the velocity of that conflict.
It’s extremely “born yesterday” behavior to assume that the Disney movie ending is a likely outcome here where the people go out into the streets and bring back the Shah and live happily ever after with western democracy. I wish all the best for the Iranian people so don’t skew this into oatmeal brained chuddist “yOuRe cHeErINg foR tHe reGimE”. I grew up with an Iranian friend whose parents were a part of the diaspora that fled during the revolution and I’ve seen how much that disinheritance hurt his parents. I’m saying even a cursory understanding of the history of conflict and religious conflict in particular betrays how insanely ******* naive some posters in this thread are being in service to their own confirmation bias.
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and had deposed central Taliban authority and established an interim government with Kharzai by December. From October to March, the US sustained only 12 casualties to the 15,000+ suffered by Taliban fighters. That war would go on to last an additional 19 years.
The Iranian regime isn’t just the Iyatollah. It’s a substantial hierarchy of clerics. Cut off the head and the next successor will move up in line. Cut down further along the hierarchy and you create a larger number of co-equals contending for legitimacy and created opportunity for sectarian violence. The regime isn’t propped up by nothing, the IRGC, who’s charter is explicitly not to protect Iranian sovereignty but rather as the Ordo militant of the state religion, is well armed and either ideologically or opportunistically devoted to the sustainment of the current Iranian paradigm and will either coalesce to form the strongest faction in the coming sectarian violence or will fracture into multiple smaller paramilitary groups that will increase the velocity of that conflict.
It’s extremely “born yesterday” behavior to assume that the Disney movie ending is a likely outcome here where the people go out into the streets and bring back the Shah and live happily ever after with western democracy. I wish all the best for the Iranian people so don’t skew this into oatmeal brained chuddist “yOuRe cHeErINg foR tHe reGimE”. I grew up with an Iranian friend whose parents were a part of the diaspora that fled during the revolution and I’ve seen how much that disinheritance hurt his parents. I’m saying even a cursory understanding of the history of conflict and religious conflict in particular betrays how insanely ******* naive some posters in this thread are being in service to their own confirmation bias.
you're right. we've taken the easiest step. The hard part comes in establishing a government that the Iranian people will support - and not all of them will support the next leader. For us, we're not very good at nation building and that's why I think Trump/Netanyahu comments were appropriate..the Iranian people have to take the steps to build their own government. That's the hard part
Massey has long been a pain in Trump's arse but especially so since Trump refused to endorse his reelection bid. It's interesting how people react to Trump's public criticisms. Some like Ted Cruze got passed Trump's insults and is now a strong ally. Others like Mitt Romney started to oppose Trump on many things. Marjorie Taylor Green has become a Trump hater after years of being a huge supporter.
One thing about democrats is that they stick together when it comes time to vote. Some republicans are much more stubborn if they aren't getting everything they want.
I'm not a fan of the attack on Iran but I understand that they're the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism. I appreciate that it's not an easy call.
One thing I dislike is how the U.S. always has to be the world's police. It speaks volumes that leaders of our European "allies" have gone out of their way to say they haven't had any involvement but they support what Trump is doing. IMO we don't need cheerleaders, we need partners. The same could be said for the peaceful middle eastern countries.
One thing I dislike is how the U.S. always has to be the world's police. It speaks volumes that leaders of our European "allies" have gone out of their way to say they haven't had any involvement but they support what Trump is doing. IMO we don't need cheerleaders, we need partners. The same could be said for the peaceful middle eastern countries.
Probably has a better understanding than the Shah’s fanboys in LA.
What’s the end game? A lot of people there are getting set up to get tossed some rifles by the CIA and thrown to the wolves against people that have nothing to lose anymore.
Called what bluff? That they decided they’ll go out swinging before they capitulate and get bombed anyway?
We’re good at bombing people. The hard part is what comes after. What’s the plan for these people? Yeah guys you have no opposition leader apart from the rich boy who’s dad fled on vacation 40+ years ago, but go out and grab some guns so you can get gunned down by the tens of thousands.
I don't think you're considering how much or how hard I'd be slapping you. Sometimes a dog is as food as any man.
MAGA = America First
America First = America #1 militarily and economically.
QED: America #1 M&E = World Policeman aka the Sheriff (job comes with the position)
No way to prove I was dead on but
FROM THE FIRST MOMENT OF THE BUILDUP I ABSOLUTELY KNEW THAT THE US UNDER TRUMP WAS GOING TO GUT IRAN
Trump is also being very careful about sending in troops as the change of regime needs to be an internal Iranian decision to stick
Iraq and Afghanistan are the examples of doing too much
Trump in Venezuela and when Cuba capitulates will follow a path of having the locals make changes under US oversight and direction
But no US troops on the ground or if any just a minimum
Japan and Germany are the models. But we abandoned that for political correctness in the modern age. Purple thumbs and the democracy cart got put in front of the culture change horse.
We (dems mostly) are well onboard with pushing LGBTQ+ and other woke insanity on our own kids but we can't be bothered to de-islamicize these back@ssward 3rd world sh!tholes and force a secular government upon them. There was the need for compulsory secular education for their young and in their universities.
We have had a presence in Japan and Germany for 80 years and S.K. for 70. We cut and ran from Afghanistan after 20 years and less than 5000 deaths.
We stripped Japans emperor of his divinity in their constitution. We let the Afghan government put sharia in their constitution.
To force our philosophical will upon our vanquished foes would be so declasse. It would offend the New England sensibilities and sense of fair play that the Bushes grew up with. Truman, MacArthur, and Marshall would not have such qualms.
You can't draw a swastika in Germany without going to jail. They are very pacifist and we basically de-nutted them at the end of WW2. Contrast that to the radical militant Nazis.
Long and short we needed to be committed to brainwashing and bringing leftist style propaganda to the enemy. We do this by giving them the mind virus libs have tried to foist on our own kids in order to neuter their youth and society.
Eunuchs are no threat to the harem. You sterilize the enemy while protecting your own. Let their boys paint their nails and wear dresses while ours are imbued with "toxic masculinity."
Might be true. We don't have the intelligence that's available to the government but I think this guy's concerns are legitimate. Trump is taking a big risk and it could blow up in his face just as easily as turn into a major success.
Before we even get to who the new leaders would be I would be concerned about how this operation ends. It seems like Trump is hoping that Iranian leaders will try to save their lives and accept amnesty. It's also possible that they go down in a blaze of glory by unleashing everything they have on the region.
You didn't answer the question about where is your outrage over the approximately 62 homicides that occur in America each day.
You didn't address why you go beyond ignoring murders by those entrusted to protect, to actively celebrating the federal government murdering its citizens.
You, instead, like a good member of the party of personal responsibility and accountability, cried on behalf of law enforcement, that their job is too hard, and it's other people's fault ... and this, apparently is why they murder people? Or something. It's unclear, because you're just a troll without any actual logical thoughts ... just childish trolling commentary. JohnHughsPartner say: "I murder you because my job is hard, and it's your fault!" That's almost as good as the time you said you couldn't exhibit basic literacy because you had a job (despite being on here 24/7, and you apparently have time for that).
I don't think being the world's policeman is financially sustainable. That's why Trump has pushed so hard to get the EU to pay their fair share. To this day Canada is only spending 1.2% of GDP on defense. Finland and Sweden joined NATO to get U.S. protection.