Wasn't that literally the complaint when we were sending supplies to Ukraine from MAGA?
Well we had to have enough to take care of emerging things in the middle east and elsewhere and still have enough to deter, and if needed fight and win a conventional fight with China over Taiwan right?
I think this is one where everyone is right. We are almost "out" but at the same time we're not going to run out tomorrow.
"out" doesnt' necessarily mean " zero left" . Just like airplanes and fuel. Its considered 'out of fuel' when they have reached their minimum safe level and have to move directly to a place to land. Literally having no fuel and starting to crash is also 'out of fuel' ... but that's way worse.
This fight is one that we need to finish and we have enought to do that job, but i'm sure strategic planners and those in the know are watching magazine inventory in the middle east deplete at epic rates and our strategic stockpiles tick down and are concerned.
Its a reality that we let our munition production capability atrophy to little more than training replacment levels over the years. Our stockpiles of many munitions have been reduced greatly and/or not at sufficient levels. If you look at ukraine... that war continues to chew through 155mm arty rounds of all flavors. ATACMs and MLRS rockets as well. We've already started ramping production of 155mm and Europe is also doing the same so, while Ukraine needs much more, i think the 155MM situation in Ukraine has stabilized a bit since Europe is helping more. (i could be wrong). Use of ATACMs/MLRS has slowed partly due to ammunition, but also due to vulinerability of the launchers and the Russians adapting and providing less lucrative targets.
The real bottleneck is Air and Ballistic Missile Defense. Land based and sea based. Our Air Defense missiles (of all types) are super capable but super expensive and we dont' make many each month/year. The proliferation of cheap drones and other missile threats has brought mass back into the equation. Use is way way outstripping production. Taking THAAD for example ( high altitued air and ballistic missile defense) we make +-8 per month (and that's an increase from years back). We used over 150 missiles in 12 days defending Israel last year. AI says that was 25% of our total inventory.
Patriot (air defense workhorse) missiles are also critically low. - AI puts us at about 25% of stockpiles remaining . AI says ukraine is burning through 60-70 per month and that rationed use agains the highest priority targets and to defend the highest priority areas. We've burnt though hundreds in the last couple days, i'd have to guess.
Also TLAMs (Sea-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles). We are going to need the **** out of those in any future fights (think china). So far in this latest fight vs Iran , AI says that we have expended 5 YEARS worth of production.
Lastly "out" can also mean, zero left in the combat theatre or maybe in the case of ships, the ship has zero left, or only enough to defend itself. The ship has to leave the fight to reload, maybe our expenditure was greater than planned and we are in danger of running out if we don't dont accelerate the replenishment in theater from strategic stockpiles.
edit: fixed grammer/spelling