I'm pretty sure that's what John Wayne Gacy ate.Having tempeh bbq tonight on the grill coated with marsala wine, liquid smoke, liquid aminos, and nibbles baby potatoes with rosemary oil
I'm pretty sure that's what John Wayne Gacy ate.Having tempeh bbq tonight on the grill coated with marsala wine, liquid smoke, liquid aminos, and nibbles baby potatoes with rosemary oil
Think you posted on wrong thread lol….I'm pretty sure that's what John Wayne Gacy ate.
The greater cause is to protect fellow Americans . We're eventually going to pass the per capita death totals in WW2 and that's a depressing thing to even think about.
I mean I wish they taught things like how to eat healthily, physical fitness, and personal finance from a young age as that would better society. Instead, they just throw kids in PE and hope for the best. The problem is people don't have self-control and need some sense of guidance. That guidance is where the government should come into play but that doesn't happen.Appreciate the response. If you think everyone being 100% vaccinated would make everything open back up that’s just not true. In NYC you have to have a vaxport but they still have it everywhere. Israel is basically 100% vaxxed and they continue having problems. Sweden or whoever said screw you sisies we’ll just go about our business have done great, weird.
Here’s the key to opening up and it’s worked fantastic in Florida where I live, just go about living life whether you’re vaxxed or not. Act like there’s nothing to worry about,now you’re open again! Crazy idea. If you are worried about dying from Covid, mask up and get vaxxed, stay home whatever you want.
Don’t want to die in a place crash, don’t board a plane.
Don’t want to die a miserable death in a hospital bed due to smoking and obesity, stop smoking and exercise while eating healthy.
This **** is SOOOOO SIMPLE, it’s just people don’t have the willpower or ability to deny themselves these things. You’re no different than a heroin junkie your smack is just legal. Same with Covid.
420,000 Americans died in WW2 while 847,000 have died from Covidwut?
420,000 Americans died in WW2 while 847,000 have died from Covid
U.S. population at the end of the war was around 140 million while today it's around 330 million
330 over 140 is 2.35
420,000*2.35 is 987,000
I.E. 987,000 Americans died in WW2 when matching it to the current U.S. population. 847,000 people have died from Covid. It's depressing to think that we're only 140k deaths from passing the number of American deaths in WW2.
How many has died from Covid versus because of Covid?
And are you saying Covid was a bio-engineered act of war? Or do you compare illness comparable to an act of war?
Seems like a stupid comparison.
I mean I wish they taught things like how to eat healthily, physical fitness, and personal finance from a young age as that would better society. Instead, they just throw kids in PE and hope for the best. The problem is people don't have self-control and need some sense of guidance. That guidance is where the government should come into play but that doesn't happen.
My issue with opening-up** are the long-term costs of doing so. I'd expect those that have opened up are doing better financially currently but when factoring in the higher death rates per capita would those deaths hurt the economy in the long run? For example, someone dying at 70 had an expected 15 years left to live. Extrapolate that over hundreds of thousands of deaths and the financial number becomes huge.
For example, I read a study that said just the deaths from 2020 would account for a loss of 17 trillion dollars over the long haul. If last year was worse then you'd have a number of at least 34 trillion. I'd have to see if the report was updated to reflect more current info.
**With that being said since it's been 2 years and this stuff is endemic it really doesn't make sense to stay closed. Pretty much past the point where it'll just disappear.
^Furthermore, if you’re pro vax and believe they work well, then why would you ever care if anyone else got vaxxed? You should be good to go, correct?
Can you imagine applying super vaxxers’ stance on everyday life? Some lady in a restaurant orders fried chicken and Mac n Cheese…next table over. “Ma’am how DARE you order fried chicken!? You don’t care about your health and are okay with possibly dying from it!? For SHAME!!??”
They're mostly vaccinated so it's not really an issue. If 2m cases in the US happened that would be awful because of the lower vaccination rates.Australia had 135k cases today - almost equivalent to 2M cases in US….but by all means, spend time and energy keeping this fella out as some sort of virus control measure.
Lol - so why does that make it reasonable to keep Djokovic out?They're mostly vaccinated so it's not really an issue. If 2m cases in the US happened that would be awful because of the lower vaccination rates.
If you're vaccinated the odds of you even going to the hospital from covid is around .19%.
How many has died from Covid versus because of Covid?
And are you saying Covid was a bio-engineered act of war? Or do you compare illness comparable to an act of war?
Seems like a stupid comparison.
Difficult for you to understand I know. Those deaths from your wwII models occurred mostly in men from the ages of 18 to 35. Entire generation of youngsters in their prime who would be the biggest contributors to productivity economically speaking not to mention reproductive losses to the next generation.420,000 Americans died in WW2 while 847,000 have died from Covid
U.S. population at the end of the war was around 140 million while today it's around 330 million
330 over 140 is 2.35
420,000*2.35 is 987,000
I.E. 987,000 Americans died in WW2 when matching it to the current U.S. population. 847,000 people have died from Covid. It's depressing to think that we're only 140k deaths from passing the number of American deaths in WW2.
So I'm assuming you're referencing the 6% CDC study? I.E. only 6% of Covid deaths were because of Covid while 94% were those of people who had at least one comorbidity who happened to have Covid when they died.
The issue about this is it ignores the fact that most Americans have at least one comorbidity. That 6% were perfectly healthy and died from covid.
If I'm obese and got covid and died then it's a covid death. My obesity would eventually be the end of me but I was unlucky and got covid and it happened to kill me.
If someone has cancer and ended up taking their own life, they died from that means, not from cancer. If that same person got covid and died, they died from covid.
If someone was perfectly healthy, got covid and died from pneumonia then they died from covid because it led to pneumonia.
If you're not referencing this 6% study, I'd like to read more on what you're referencing. If you can provide links I'd read them.
Lastly, I don't think it was a bio-engineered act of war. It either jumped from an animal to humans or developed in a lab and leaked out. China is known for having poor regulations and safety standards so it wouldn't shock me if it were the latter.
I wasn't necessarily comparing the illness itself to an act of war. I was comparing the rationing that happened in WW2 with being vaccinated here and how the former people came together while the latter there's division. With that being said I do think you could compare a global pandemic to an act of war where the enemy is the virus rather than a country and the soldiers therein. I mean the US death toll will soon pass that of the US WW2 death toll** and that's in half the time no less.
**1945 population converted to 2022 population.
But your issue with opening up doesn’t account for the negatives to keeping things closed. It also assumes that keeping things closed causes the avoidance of any deaths or negatives. It also doesn’t have an end goal or criteria of when you can open things up. You know what I’m saying? You’re framing it like “well 800,000 people died versus 0 if we kept it closed” which you can then come up with a figure for all the the damage done by “opening things back up”. But then you’re not taking account that “keeping things closed” would still result in deaths like we’ve already seen. Look at Australia which has an amazing amount of cases and they been completely locked down. So now let’s just be really generous to you and say if we locked down it would have DRAMATICALLY decreased death so let’s say instead of 800,000 dead it’s actually 300,000 dead. Well great, we saved 500,00 lives!
But then you have to factor in that a large majority of the deaths are people that are at end stage of life, in retirement homes, and not in the workforce. And that’s not me pulling things out of my *** that’s the numbers. So let’s just be generous to you and say half of the deaths were that (I believe the number is higher actually). So that eliminates 400,000 so now with lockdowns.
But then you have to factor in the fact that the actual lockdowns have caused depression, overdoses, suicides, lost learning and development etc. These have actually targeted younger people and teenagers - people with decades to live and lots of benefit to society. Let’s be generous to you and say the lockdowns have only caused 100,000 excess deaths.
When you look at it that way “keeping things closed” hasn’t really helped that much has it? And we literally just had the most cases ever this month lol, so are they even effective? Not trying to argue just another perspective for you to consider.
This a long post of horse ****. Do you write pro-covid fan fiction?
But your issue with opening up doesn’t account for the negatives to keeping things closed. It also assumes that keeping things closed causes the avoidance of any deaths or negatives. It also doesn’t have an end goal or criteria of when you can open things up. You know what I’m saying? You’re framing it like “well 800,000 people died versus 0 if we kept it closed” which you can then come up with a figure for all the the damage done by “opening things back up”. But then you’re not taking account that “keeping things closed” would still result in deaths like we’ve already seen. Look at Australia which has an amazing amount of cases and they been completely locked down. So now let’s just be really generous to you and say if we locked down it would have DRAMATICALLY decreased death so let’s say instead of 800,000 dead it’s actually 300,000 dead. Well great, we saved 500,00 lives!
But then you have to factor in that a large majority of the deaths are people that are at end stage of life, in retirement homes, and not in the workforce. And that’s not me pulling things out of my *** that’s the numbers. So let’s just be generous to you and say half of the deaths were that (I believe the number is higher actually). So that eliminates 400,000 so now with lockdowns.
But then you have to factor in the fact that the actual lockdowns have caused depression, overdoses, suicides, lost learning and development etc. These have actually targeted younger people and teenagers - people with decades to live and lots of benefit to society. Let’s be generous to you and say the lockdowns have only caused 100,000 excess deaths.
When you look at it that way “keeping things closed” hasn’t really helped that much has it? And we literally just had the most cases ever this month lol, so are they even effective? Not trying to argue just another perspective for you to consider.
How so?
No, math and science were/are my subjects and writing can die in a fire. I see this as a discussion rather than going through the pains of writing & sourcing a paper.
I actually missed your very good post when I retorted to the Coronabro. He is comparing American deaths in World War 2 to American deaths during this "pandemic" and not realizing that World War 2 killed up to 75 million people on Earth. World War 2 caused the death of about 30% of Poland; by way of contrast, "Covid" has killed about .3% of Poland- to name just one example.Difficult for you to understand I know. Those deaths from your wwII models occurred mostly in men from the ages of 18 to 35. Entire generation of youngsters in their prime who would be the biggest contributors to productivity economically speaking not to mention reproductive losses to the next generation.
Your deaths from covid however couldn't be any more opposite. The majority of deaths are from ppl over the age of 70. The rest are from ppl with many comorbidities. The 2 groups were not contributing much to society especially in terms of GDP or future growth. Not to sound grim but that's the truth.
Comparing the 2 is not only apples to oranges well it's plain stupid and shows how easily manipulated you are
Life expectancy tables allow you to look at a person’s expected remaining life from any age.Remember life expectancy is how long you're expected to live from birth. It does not mean someone who is 70 has 7 years left to live
Okay but if they choose to be unvaccinated and die, who cares? That’s their decision. You can’t make people wear seatbelts either. I don’t care about people dying anymore because of it. Everyone knows the risk, they’ve made their choice, so let’s move the touch on and put it to bed.I think it's about caring for others. I know I'm fine based on the number of studies I've read: Texas study, NY study, United Kingdom study, etc.
I worry about those that are unvaccinated getting it because it's shown to be more deadly to those unvaccinated. My father is on the far right (makes the current GOP look far left) and never really took proper precautions. He knew my mom had COPD but thought covid was fake because of the news he consumed and the people he hung around with. He ended up getting covid right after Thanksgiving 2021 and was bedridden for all of December. My mom got it from him the first week of December. Thankfully my mom was vaccinated in early 2021 (booster Fall 2021) and had mild symptoms but my dad has been a wreck. He's had friends pass from covid and when I try to throw some sense at him he ends up listening at first but then backtracks once he talks to friends. These people misconstrue the CDC 6% study which in turn leads to them not taking covid seriously. I worry about misinformed people like this.
Someone eating mac and cheese isn't going to make the person eating a salad unhealthy nor can it impact the health of everyone else in that restaurant.
Someone unvaccinated, not taking precautions, etc can spread it around. Those that are vaccinated that end up getting it will be fine but those that are unvaccinated at that restaurant might not be.
Jesus said "Love thy neighbor" and yet it seems people don't think like that anymore.
Australia at this point frankly looks like the alpha test site for the Great Reset.I have wanted to go to Australia for years and was planning a trip and also take in New Zealand for a week or so. I am striking that trip, Australia would be a nightmare to visit.
My time on earth is limited so I will spend it in a place where people have not lost their mind. FREE FLORIDA
Correct and that's what I was referring to saying a 70 year old has 15 years left to live at least according to those ssa actuarial tables.Life expectancy tables allow you to look at a person’s expected remaining life from any age.
Correct and that's what I was referring to saying a 70 year old has 15 years left to live at least according to those ssa actuarial tables.
My issue is people treating the deaths of the older generations as if they're eventually going to die anyway and that's not the case. They see a 75 year old and think that person only has a few years left to live when in reality it's probably closer to 12 years.
You missed the point of my original post which was the sacrifice by our people to ration goods so our soldiers could win the war.I actually missed your very good post when I retorted to the Coronabro. He is comparing American deaths in World War 2 to American deaths during this "pandemic" and not realizing that World War 2 killed up to 75 million people on Earth. World War 2 caused the death of about 30% of Poland; by way of contrast, "Covid" has killed about .3% of Poland- to name just one example.
It does but they're still covid deaths. If the country took better actions in early 2020 we wouldn't have such a high loss of life. Look at other first world countries in comparison.Any thoughts about the CDC director saying last week 75% of COVID deaths have been by people with AT MINIMUM 4 comorbidities? Do you feel that might make their life expectancy lower than average?
Again my original post had nothing to do with comparing deaths.The Spanish Flu is the only true pandemic in modern history. It killed about 3% of the world, yet the world failed to wet the bed over it. Granted, during that time period, there was no Zoom and no pajama class who had the luxury to scold people for trying to work and support their families during the pandemic. The world at that point didn't have the luxury of upper middle class parasites able to live on DoorDash while the working class were still exposed.
By way of contrast, "Covid" has killed less than .1% of the world. At this point, the per capita ratio for the Spanish Flu is about 50 to 1, never mind that the Spanish Flu killed the young as indiscriminately as the old. The Black Death ratio to "Covid" is about 500 to 1, yet the hipsters insist that this is the Black Death, or World War 2. Well, if it really is World War 2, then let's have Nuremberg trials for those what funded the dangerous research what caused this crap in the first place.
If you look at "other first world countries", let's start with Sweden, which took fewer measure than any European nation, outside of Belarus, and they're doing relatively fine. For that matter, so is Belarus, though I would hesitate to call Belarus "first world". We are, in terms of death rate, marginally better than most of Eastern Europe (which, for the most part, took stricter measures than we did), and marginally worse than most of Western Europe. I'm not sure what lessons can be drawn from that. The nation with the highest death rate in the world, which lockdowned fast, hard, and long, is Peru.It does but they're still covid deaths. If the country took better actions in early 2020 we wouldn't have such a high loss of life. Look at other first world countries in comparison.
Sure those people with a number of comorbidities will likely have a shorter lifespan but at least a number of those deaths could've been prevented if we had took covid seriously when this all started.
My issue is people discounting these deaths because they had comorbidities when in fact most Americans have at least one.
You're correct you can't force people to wear seat belts but it's required by law. Getting vaccinated is a personal decision but that doesn't mean not getting one is the right choice.Okay but if they choose to be unvaccinated and die, who cares? That’s their decision. You can’t make people wear seatbelts either. I don’t care about people dying anymore because of it. Everyone knows the risk, they’ve made their choice, so let’s move the touch on and put it to bed.
The long term costs of saving stubborn fat, old, sickly people isn’t worth the short term gain of them being alive for 5-10 more years.
You're correct saying it's foolish but it's also selfish.How is it "selfish" not to take a vaccine? That is counter-intuitive. If the vaccine protects, then it is a foolish decision not to take it but far from "selfish".
I'll have to take a look.If you look at "other first world countries", let's start with Sweden, which took fewer measure than any European nation, outside of Belarus, and they're doing relatively fine. For that matter, so is Belarus, though I would hesitate to call Belarus "first world". We are, in terms of death rate, marginally better than most of Eastern Europe (which, for the most part, took stricter measures than we did), and marginally worse than most of Western Europe. I'm not sure what lessons can be drawn from that. The nation with the highest death rate in the world, which lockdowned fast, hard, and long, is Peru.