OT: B10 expands/PAC B12 TBD

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,813
83,354
113
USC/UCLA already make that time zone thing true regardless of Oregon/Washington. There may be a stay or reprieve for now but I still believe it will happen sooner or later. I've always said timetables are hard to predict, except tv deal expirations are often a good guess. So if not now, some time in the future it will still likely come to fruition.
Yeah, I get it. But scheduling 1 West coast game per year not a big deal. Scheduling 2 or 3 per year, and then considering hoops and all the non-revenue sports, and it gets expensive and puts a lot of pressure and takes a lot of time away from the student athletes, who, mostly, except for a handful, are students first, and athletes second. Think about the number of football and hoops players who will actually move to the next level of pro sports, and it is not many. I'm sure I will get killed by some for my line of thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1_rivals

Ridge 22

All-American
Jun 30, 2007
7,348
9,428
98
The comeback to that is there will be opportunities later. IMO, this is not a now or never decision to move. A short term decision to kill a historical conference with a 107 year history would be a bad short-term decision just to make a few extra bucks.
Maybe there will. Maybe there wont. Regardless, if they sign a GOR, they will be locked in again for a bit. Again, making decisions as an individual school with better options based on the sentiments for a conference on life support is short-sighted decision making IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I wonder if this is less about the PAC staying together and more about the B1G getting cold feet.
Well the B10 moving was still predicated on Arizona/ASU/Utah. So those schools had to be the first dominoes regardless of how the B10 felt. If they don't fall, the B10 wasn't going to act.
 

Ridge 22

All-American
Jun 30, 2007
7,348
9,428
98
Yeah, I get it. But scheduling 1 West coast game per year not a big deal. Scheduling 2 or 3 per year, and then considering hoops and all the non-revenue sports, and it gets expensive and puts a lot of pressure and takes a lot of time away from the student athletes, who, mostly, except for a handful, are students first, and athletes second. Think about the number of football and hoops players who will actually move to the next level of pro sports, and it is not many. I'm sure I will get killed by some for my line of thinking.
if you have enough schools, no reason the Olympic sports cant play in regional pods. It doesnt have to be a one size fits all answer for all sports. Football and MBB vs the rest might look quite different from a scheduling perspective
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

AntiG

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2012
4,512
3,561
113
wow ASU is blocking Arizona from leaving the PAC via ABOR
 

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,664
9,819
58
I think this is much simpler than a lot of you are making it. I don't think this is about Washington/Oregon making a bad decision not to jump. Washington/Oregon have been trying to jump to the Big Ten at least as long ago as the USC/UCLA departure. But the Big Ten is too busy digesting the latter two schools to want to take on more at this time. There's an additional problem with taking UNC or UVA: One can be liable for inducing a breach of contract, and so there is no way the Big Ten goes near any ACC school as long as the ACC's GOR is in force.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,059
15,638
113
I wonder if this is less about the PAC staying together and more about the B1G getting cold feet.
Yea..this is crazy…changing by the minute. Rumors that Arizona might now leave now when it was considered a done deal. That changes everything.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I think this is much simpler than a lot of you are making it. I don't think this is about Washington/Oregon making a bad decision not to jump. Washington/Oregon have been trying to jump to the Big Ten at least as long ago as the USC/UCLA departure. But the Big Ten is too busy digesting the latter two schools to want to take on more at this time. There's an additional problem with taking UNC or UVA: One can be liable for inducing a breach of contract, and so there is no way the Big Ten goes near any ACC school as long as the ACC's GOR is in force.
No conference will go near a school that isn't free and clear. But looks like FSU with an outside the box move might try to use private equity money to help fund getting out of their GOR. I posted it in the FSU thread.

That would be something to see lol.
 

AntiG

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2012
4,512
3,561
113
Yea..this is crazy…changing by the minute. Rumors that Arizona might now leave now when it was considered a done deal. That changes everything.
Arizona decided to leave last night, but ASU is blocking them since the ABOR wants to keep them together in the same conference or at least both have strong landing spots (i.e. one in B12, other in B1G)
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,059
15,638
113
Wonder if the Pac12 is offering uneven revenue shares…which would be lipstick on a pig. Can’t see Oregon or Arizona signing a GOR with the Pac12 and leaving all that money on the table.
 

MulletCork

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2012
2,630
3,153
113
Hoping the PAC 12 stays together because the college sports landscape is better of with The Conference of Champions remaining at least in its current form (less USC, UCLA and Colorado) than being destroyed by sheer greed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeantownKnight

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Staying would be stupid for any teams with options. What do they is think going to happen to their brand value with most of their games unwatched on Apple TV? Do they think ESPN and Fox will pay more for them in 6 years to reappear on linear TV?
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Wonder if the Pac12 is offering uneven revenue shares…which would be lipstick on a pig. Can’t see Oregon or Arizona signing a GOR with the Pac12 and leaving all that money on the table.
One rumor I posted just now is that Oregon State and Washington State are willing to take reduced shares and give it to Oregon and Washington.
 

Ridge 22

All-American
Jun 30, 2007
7,348
9,428
98
Staying would be stupid for any teams with options. What do they is think going to happen to their brand value with most of their games unwatched on Apple TV? Do they think ESPN and Fox will pay more for them in 6 years to reappear on linear TV?
Agree. Secure your future now, or degrade your program for the next 6 years and hope someone throws you a lifeline then? How does that makes sense?
 

AntiG

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2012
4,512
3,561
113
might as well drop to MWC if they are going to do that lol
 

AntiG

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2012
4,512
3,561
113
I know B1G doesn't want to be the "bad guy who breaks up the PAC" but they should offer a backroom wink to ASU as a travel partner for USC and UCLA and bring along them and Stanford along with Oregon/Washington and allow Arizona/Utah to "break up the PAC" by jumping to BXII.

ASU has hockey and top 10 wrestling
 

RU from Jersey_rivals

All-Conference
Jan 16, 2002
2,609
1,645
0
If the Big Ten needs to expand and Oregon and Washington are off the table then go for UNC and UVA as they would fit in academically (putting aside the no show classes from the past) plus they would be a good fit from a non-revenue sports perspective. Lacrosse for one would be a nice fit. Not to mention they have good baseball programs.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I wonder if the news with FSU possibly buying out their GOR using PE money might not have spurred the B10 (Fox in the background) to get to 20 in one fell swoop with Oregon/Washington/FSU and I'm not sure who #20 will be.
 

Ridge 22

All-American
Jun 30, 2007
7,348
9,428
98

Honestly who cares who makes the first move? Has that really been relevant or had any implacations to date? I don't see it. If I am a Pac 12 school with a chance to move now and secure my future, I look out for myself over the interests of a dying conference. If Arizona or Utah allow the AAU President, who is more out of touch with reality than the old Big East leadership, to impact their movement, their leadership should be fired for negligence.
 

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,664
9,819
58
No conference will go near a school that isn't free and clear. But looks like FSU with an outside the box move might try to use private equity money to help fund getting out of their GOR. I posted it in the FSU thread.

That would be something to see lol.
FSU isn't the only ACC school that can raise a lot of money, and the ACC will not want to set a precedent of letting a school out. So the ACC would demand a huge price. Note that for all of the talk of suing to break the GOR, no one has actually done it -- that may say something about the odds of success.

BTW, speaking as someone who went to high school in Central Florida in the 1960s, I find it hysterically funny that the University of South Florida, a poor relation then, has made it to the AAU ahead of FSU.
 

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,664
9,819
58
I think this is much simpler than a lot of you are making it. I don't think this is about Washington/Oregon making a bad decision not to jump. Washington/Oregon have been trying to jump to the Big Ten at least as long ago as the USC/UCLA departure. But the Big Ten is too busy digesting the latter two schools to want to take on more at this time. There's an additional problem with taking UNC or UVA: One can be liable for inducing a breach of contract, and so there is no way the Big Ten goes near any ACC school as long as the ACC's GOR is in force.
There's something else here: the Big Ten would look bad leaving Cal and Stanford stranded, and the Big Ten does not want to take all four schools.