OT: COVID-19 news. Out of over 3000 positive tests in prison

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 10, 2020
8,138
0
0
just got a text from a buddy in Birmingham, AL:

everything open today, bars, restaurants, beaches, gyms, hair salons, etc. only things still restricted are night clubs and movie theaters.

gov: "we fully understand this will mean a significant increase in positive cases, and we feel our hospitals are ready to respond to the increase."

I guess we'll see.
 

Tarheelhusker

All-Conference
Mar 28, 2003
21,599
1,109
3
Decisions, decisions, decisions. The bride and me must go grocery shopping and the dilemma being mask up and face the world & risk our well being. We just don’t know what to do what with the media reporting the dangers of being alive in these frightening times...and then I remember this...

 

MOHUSKER

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2009
16,561
1,806
113
Decisions, decisions, decisions. The bride and me must go grocery shopping and the dilemma being mask up and face the world & risk our well being. We just don’t know what to do what with the media reporting the dangers of being alive in these frightening times...and then I remember this...


Why “must” you both go?
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
They're the same politically motivated people who gave us the false narrative that antibiotic use in animals was causing antibiotic resistance in humans. In fact the evidence does not remotely support that. Antibiotic resistance is occurring in humans because of widespread antibiotic use in....wait for it....HUMANS. GASP. The worst possible bug you can get lurks in hospitals. It sucks, but the things they've done to complicate things for livestock producers will do nothing to prevent antibiotic resistance of bugs in humans. But oh well, the intentions were good?
Headed up by the lady Dr, thats so controversial, the guy she named, the head of the cdc.

Yep, no sparing the usage of antibiotics, then not following through with infection and prescriptions.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
It’s not a redefinition at all. It’s how you keep the health systems from being overwhelmed.
By locking down until you have a good system of controlling it in place. If you reopen before you are ready, the numbers can go back up again. So healthcare systems could still be at risk.
You don't control the virus, you prepare for cares.
Until testing, known breakouts, bed assessments, ventilator counts etc etc, then using real time break out vs current cases with known hospital capacity.
We may be arguing the same thing, but it still comes back to the original, no overwhelming of the cares system. That I agree with.
That's why the Rt in my link was so important to establish.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
No one says masks are 100% effective. But they help by a good margin. Anyone who wants us to reopen and stay open should be advocating all of these measures or else small businesses will continue to suffer. People aren’t really good at keeping space either btw. Plenty of packs and groups etc to be seen everywhere you look.
If those packs have been packs for months, and they act differently around unknowns, then it's perceptions.
Like the couple who was arrested for not keeping six feet apart.
We will have to trust one another,it's what Sweden did from the onset, leaving liberty to its people, not going nanny state and removing those liberties.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
Do you understand this move by the coffee shop and what you're suggesting is ultimately a lawless world? Since when did it become so popular, even encouraged to disrespect law and order? When institutions are no longer trusted or respected, our system is no longer a system.

What if the circumstances were flipped and a conservative governor was in place and made a demand on local businesses or citizens, and then those citizens basically gave the middle finger and said "you're not in charge of me"? Is it still cool?
To me,it's above politics, it's we the people.
I could care less what pol wears on their lapel taking away my liberties beyond my graces.
 

RedMyMind

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2017
12,390
1,506
0
My workplace is starting to take peoples' temperature twice a day. Coworker tested with a high temp and was sent home and tested for the covid. Here in Kansas we are still using the tests that require a week for results. What a load of ****.
 
Last edited:

Trojanhorse13

Freshman
Oct 19, 2017
237
59
0
Do you understand this move by the coffee shop and what you're suggesting is ultimately a lawless world? Since when did it become so popular, even encouraged to disrespect law and order? When institutions are no longer trusted or respected, our system is no longer a system.

What if the circumstances were flipped and a conservative governor was in place and made a demand on local businesses or citizens, and then those citizens basically gave the middle finger and said "you're not in charge of me"? Is it still cool?

It's called civil disobedience. Some people are tired of having their liberties taken away from them. It's about time somebody stands up to this.
 

MOHUSKER

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2009
16,561
1,806
113
If those packs have been packs for months, and they act differently around unknowns, then it's perceptions.
Like the couple who was arrested for not keeping six feet apart.
We will have to trust one another,it's what Sweden did from the onset, leaving liberty to its people, not going nanny state and removing those liberties.

And yet Sweden is still forecasted for a 6.5% GDP drop, the same as Germany and the US, how can that be? All of our “freedom fighters” insist we can open up and we will be fine, but Sweden isn’t.

https://www.ft.com/content/93105160-dcb4-4721-9e58-a7b262cd4b6e

If their economy is tanking like everywhere else, what is the justification for the extra risk?

They have admitted they underestimated the deaths that would happen

https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...hief-says-high-death-toll-was-surprise-2020-5

Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's state epidemiologist, appeared on "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah" on Tuesday, when he described the country's controversial approach.

"We never really calculated with a high death toll initially, I must say," he said.

"We calculated on more people being sick, but the death toll really came as a surprise to us."
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
It's called civil disobedience. Some people are tired of having their liberties taken away from them. It's about time somebody stands up to this.
Its kind of sad that we had to get to this point because civil disobedience is basically the last resort against tyranny before we have full on revolution. Anybody that thinks this is just about the last couple of months is missing the bigger picture: this has been brewing for years, the politicians just didn't realize the level of overreach they are guilty of.
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
My workplace is starting to take peoples' temperature twice a day. Coworker tested with a high temp and was sent home and tested for the covid. Here in Kansas we are still using the tests that require a week for results. What a load of ****.

Temperature taking is dumb. You've already been exposed at that point for several days...
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
And yet Sweden is still forecasted for a 6.5% GDP drop, the same as Germany and the US, how can that be? All of our “freedom fighters” insist we can open up and we will be fine, but Sweden isn’t.

https://www.ft.com/content/93105160-dcb4-4721-9e58-a7b262cd4b6e

If their economy is tanking like everywhere else, what is the justification for the extra risk?

They have admitted they underestimated the deaths that would happen

https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...hief-says-high-death-toll-was-surprise-2020-5

Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's state epidemiologist, appeared on "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah" on Tuesday, when he described the country's controversial approach.

"We never really calculated with a high death toll initially, I must say," he said.

"We calculated on more people being sick, but the death toll really came as a surprise to us."

Sweden isn't going to have a huge second wave though. The thing that most of these models show us is that we are going to have the same amount of deaths no matter what. Do you want them all up front, or spaced out over a year. Sweden is taking their lumps up front.
 
Aug 20, 2014
127
39
13
Sweden isn't going to have a huge second wave though. The thing that most of these models show us is that we are going to have the same amount of deaths no matter what. Do you want them all up front, or spaced out over a year. Sweden is taking their lumps up front.
The whole point was always to try to keep the medical system working and not completely overwhelmed. Most of us will probably get it, most of us won’t need a hospital, but the reason we are doing this is to make sure there is room in the hospitals for the people that need it. Humans are dumb.
 

Sporty

Senior
Jul 4, 2007
2,616
632
113
Not taking temps to protect the person you are taking the temp of. You are taking the temps to protect everyone else.
 

MOHUSKER

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2009
16,561
1,806
113
Sweden isn't going to have a huge second wave though. The thing that most of these models show us is that we are going to have the same amount of deaths no matter what. Do you want them all up front, or spaced out over a year. Sweden is taking their lumps up front.

Based on what? Sweden has banned large gatherings, pushed for work from home and basically is at 1 death per 3K to 1 per 4K for the US. Their economy is tracking to be every bit as effed up as the US in relation to GDP impact.

I know, I know, I’m marked as “lock it down” despite repeatedly saying we should be using intelligence in determining how we approach it.

We need localized data in the hands of people to make the right decision for their area. This data includes infection rates and hospital critical care capacity. People should use masks/coverings while out in public around others. Indoor dining should be socially distanced, if not closed when a meaningful case load is known in an area.

I laugh at the sudden outpouring of care for our poorer working class from groups that have fought against them having increased wages. I scoff at the idea that we place the bank accounts of millionaires and billionaires above the actual lives of the working class.

And I maintain that anyone who is equating their inability to go get a cheeseburger and sit in a restaurant or take their 4 kids to Lowe’s to shop for flowers to a need to create an armed protest or encourage the next “civil” war is an absolute nut job.
 

chicolby

All-Conference
May 3, 2012
4,329
3,101
0
It's called civil disobedience. Some people are tired of having their liberties taken away from them. It's about time somebody stands up to this.
We all are tired of it. It's not fun. We want life to be back to normal. We don't want to lose money. We are all fed up. But "civil disobedience" is a nice way of saying "I am above your laws" and that is not the way to address this.
 

chicolby

All-Conference
May 3, 2012
4,329
3,101
0
Wait...so it's not OK to "resist"?? I need to keep a scorecard with a certain segment of our society, it's so hard keeping everything straight anymore....but setting that hypocrisy aside, you are more than welcome to stay home. It's a great big scary world out there.
Why do you put "resist" in quotations? Is that a better way of explaining a defiance of law and order? So when someone is just tired of ****, they should just call it "resisting" and call it a day.

I made my case without peppering my post with words like "scary" to somehow make you seem tougher than me. I'm not afraid of the virus because I've already had it. My point is much more about faith in institutions and following the law. You seem to celebrate people breaking the law. Go protest. Go take a knee. Go talk to your representatives. But to cheer on a blatant disobedience of the law is questionable to me and would result in more damage to our country.
 

chicolby

All-Conference
May 3, 2012
4,329
3,101
0
to be fair, this business made it extraordinarily clear their intentions and issued warnings to any and all who were not comfortable to stay away, stay home and not come in.

they needed the money to survive. those in attendance were supporting a local business at their own risk.
While I empathize with them, that's not how the law works. You can't simply say "hey, we're doing some illegal **** here, if you don't like it, stay away". I don't mean to sound flippant here, but ignoring orders by our government officials is not the way to solve problems. I'll repeat again - NO ONE WANTS THIS. We all want to be back to normal. We don't want people to not earn money, or have the right to earn it. It's called a sacrifice for a reason. If it were easy, it wouldn't be a sacrifice. It's hard. It sucks. But I stand on the side of following governmental leadership advice and order vs. everyone just going their own way.
 
Aug 27, 2006
27,799
5,559
0
Why do you put "resist" in quotations? Is that a better way of explaining a defiance of law and order? So when someone is just tired of ****, they should just call it "resisting" and call it a day.

I made my case without peppering my post with words like "scary" to somehow make you seem tougher than me. I'm not afraid of the virus because I've already had it. My point is much more about faith in institutions and following the law. You seem to celebrate people breaking the law. Go protest. Go take a knee. Go talk to your representatives. But to cheer on a blatant disobedience of the law is questionable to me and would result in more damage to our country.

I appreciate the civil response...we're going to have to chalk this one up to, I ain't changing my mind and I don't expect you to either. Hopefully this will all be a distant memory soon enough.
 
Jan 10, 2020
8,138
0
0
While I empathize with them, that's not how the law works. You can't simply say "hey, we're doing some illegal **** here, if you don't like it, stay away". I don't mean to sound flippant here, but ignoring orders by our government officials is not the way to solve problems. I'll repeat again - NO ONE WANTS THIS. We all want to be back to normal. We don't want people to not earn money, or have the right to earn it. It's called a sacrifice for a reason. If it were easy, it wouldn't be a sacrifice. It's hard. It sucks. But I stand on the side of following governmental leadership advice and order vs. everyone just going their own way.
you keep saying 'law'. those in charge have responded to their defiance of a public health order by simply telling them to not do that again.
 

Tarheelhusker

All-Conference
Mar 28, 2003
21,599
1,109
3
We’ve been lied too so much, it’s difficult to keep the B/S @ bay. Our enemies are watching how we handle this.
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
The whole point was always to try to keep the medical system working and not completely overwhelmed. Most of us will probably get it, most of us won’t need a hospital, but the reason we are doing this is to make sure there is room in the hospitals for the people that need it. Humans are dumb.

Yeah, but that narrative has morphed. It was flatten the curve to help out the medical system, now it is flatten to help eradicate. It's all ******* stupid, and we need to open up, protect the elderly and unhealthy and move on with our lives.
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
The whole point was always to try to keep the medical system working and not completely overwhelmed. Most of us will probably get it, most of us won’t need a hospital, but the reason we are doing this is to make sure there is room in the hospitals for the people that need it. Humans are dumb.
Didn't you get the memo? The goalposts have been moved from "trying to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed" to "not a single death, ever, no matter what it costs"
 

schuele

All-American
Apr 17, 2005
21,124
5,734
0
you keep saying 'law'. those in charge have responded to their defiance of a public health order by simply telling them to not do that again.
If only Polis was more politically savvy, he would just claim he had nothing to do with it, blame TriCounty Health and Tweet out #FreeCastleRock!

Seems to fool some of the people some of the time.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
8,993
1,443
113
The whole point was always to try to keep the medical system working and not completely overwhelmed. Most of us will probably get it, most of us won’t need a hospital, but the reason we are doing this is to make sure there is room in the hospitals for the people that need it. Humans are dumb.
Pretty much everywhere but New York, the hospitals haven't been close to capacity. It's not like capacity has to be static either. If worst comes to worst, states could set up field hospitals, commandeer hotels, etc., if they needed more hospital beds. I also said from the beginning we should have greatly expanded training programs for new nurses and if necessary could setup a medical draft. I think we would have been just fine had the country not shutdown at all. The flattening the curve to protect hospital capacity was always a load of bs and makes no sense from an economics perspective. Even our regular baseline low capacity hospital system is handling cases just fine.
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
Pretty much everywhere but New York, the hospitals haven't been close to capacity. It's not like capacity has to be static either. If worst comes to worst, states could set up field hospitals, commandeer hotels, etc., if they needed more hospital beds. I also said from the beginning we should have greatly expanded training programs for new nurses and if necessary could setup a medical draft. I think we would have been just fine had the country not shutdown at all. The flattening the curve to protect hospital capacity was always a load of bs and makes no sense from an economics perspective. Even our regular baseline low capacity hospital system is handling cases just fine.
Well there's more than one way to destroy the healthcare industry. Never let a crisis go to waste.
 

kerpal_68

Senior
Dec 12, 2005
120,770
954
0
There is a few of you that should just lock yourselves in your home with your weeks worth of supplies and log off the internet.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
And yet Sweden is still forecasted for a 6.5% GDP drop, the same as Germany and the US, how can that be? All of our “freedom fighters” insist we can open up and we will be fine, but Sweden isn’t.

https://www.ft.com/content/93105160-dcb4-4721-9e58-a7b262cd4b6e

If their economy is tanking like everywhere else, what is the justification for the extra risk?

They have admitted they underestimated the deaths that would happen

https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...hief-says-high-death-toll-was-surprise-2020-5

Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's state epidemiologist, appeared on "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah" on Tuesday, when he described the country's controversial approach.

"We never really calculated with a high death toll initially, I must say," he said.

"We calculated on more people being sick, but the death toll really came as a surprise to us."
It could be friggin hoola hooping, if they take it away, liberty lost.
You focus on the money end all you want, you let others tell your girl to get away from you all you want, you obey their commands all you want.
Others aren't so gracious with their liberties, get over it.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
While I empathize with them, that's not how the law works. You can't simply say "hey, we're doing some illegal **** here, if you don't like it, stay away". I don't mean to sound flippant here, but ignoring orders by our government officials is not the way to solve problems. I'll repeat again - NO ONE WANTS THIS. We all want to be back to normal. We don't want people to not earn money, or have the right to earn it. It's called a sacrifice for a reason. If it were easy, it wouldn't be a sacrifice. It's hard. It sucks. But I stand on the side of following governmental leadership advice and order vs. everyone just going their own way.
What law has this business broken to be shut in the first place? Or, over reaching and trashing the constitution is ok, until more trashing of it is defied?
Then, that business better shape up?
 
Jan 10, 2020
8,138
0
0
What law has this business broken to be shut in the first place? Or, over reaching and trashing the constitution is ok, until more trashing of it is defied?
Then, that business better shape up?
I get what you're saying, and am empathetic to it, but it's a delicate balance.

do stop signs impose upon your personal liberties? I mean, after all,
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
Pretty much everywhere but New York, the hospitals haven't been close to capacity. It's not like capacity has to be static either. If worst comes to worst, states could set up field hospitals, commandeer hotels, etc., if they needed more hospital beds. I also said from the beginning we should have greatly expanded training programs for new nurses and if necessary could setup a medical draft. I think we would have been just fine had the country not shutdown at all. The flattening the curve to protect hospital capacity was always a load of bs and makes no sense from an economics perspective. Even our regular baseline low capacity hospital system is handling cases just fine.
Most the nurses I know are overworked. Pounding hours at them. We have shortages of Drs and nurses.
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
I get what you're saying, and am empathetic to it, but it's a delicate balance.

do stop signs impose upon your personal liberties? I mean, after all,
Exactly, and Ive been consistent on giving our grace by shutting down our liberties.
We are well past that point. People decide when enough is enough, not some pol somewheres.
How long have people been gracious about this? And at what costs to them?
I can't answer that any better than you, but society is about to burst.

Just the way it is.

Oh, and stop signs are well regulated tested and isn't harming people.
There is nothing lost with a stop sign, no bodies starving because of them etc.

The pols are making this up on the fly, and it's out of touch for some, not enough for others.
The not enough crowd aren't starving, losing their house, their business etc.
 

MOHUSKER

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2009
16,561
1,806
113
Consider yourself totally blind about discussions of liberties.

Open to it, spell out what liberties you’ve been denied specifically.

Religion? Press? Speech? Assembly? Petition?

I could maybe get behind assembly, but in times of public health crisis the Supreme Court has been pretty consistent in allowing some restrictions or requiring specific actions in the name of public health. If you’re so worried about your liberties lawyer up and bring a case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.