OT: Devils Trade Jaromir Jagr

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,034
17,658
97
Guess signaling Lou Lamoriello is giving up on the season.

Not bad return for him..I was hoping for a 3rd round pick..but the Panthers gave up a 2nd round pick this season..and a 3rd round pick next year. Nice get for NJ.
 

JMORC2003

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2008
4,609
2,535
0
Can't say I'm surprised... his minutes were down and he's been pretty vocal about it. Makes sense, he can still help a team in the short term. Devils need young forwards, so a 2nd and choice of 3rd from either Fla or the Wild next year is a steal for the good guys!

This post was edited on 2/26 5:02 PM by JMORC2003
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,034
17,658
97
Originally posted by mikemarc1:
Guess signaling Lou Lamoriello is giving up on the season.

Not bad return for him..I was hoping for a 3rd round pick..but the Panthers gave up a 2nd round pick this season..and a 3rd round pick next year. Nice get for NJ.
Not surprised he was traded either...kinda surprising that Florida went all in on him and he agreed to go there.

It's not like they're a lock for the playoffs. i thought he'd go somewhere guaranteed a spot. Not complaining though.

Time for the rebuild. Hopefully Zidlicky and Ryder are the next to go.
 

brista21

Freshman
Dec 7, 2004
7,840
63
0
Not only do the Devs need to rebuild, but Lamoriello needs to retire as well. Trading Jagr for these draft picks was a good move though.
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
Lamorillo has needed to go for awhile. Went way to long with the adoration of Brodeur routine. Cost the Devs.
 

tuffer76

Senior
Sep 19, 2005
1,411
639
113
Great trade for Devils. They got great value for a 43 year old rental. I've questioned Lou in the last couple of years but I think recently his moves have been better. He had a rough spell with the Zajac contract, not forfeiting the pick in the Stanley Cup year, etc. problem is the team is so old up front and no youth in the system. All prospects are defenseman and he's going to havevtobtrade one or two to get young skill guys.
 

Jumba72

Junior
Nov 27, 2005
2,439
247
0
You guys are nuts. Lou still has some mulligans left. Besides, its not like he's had an open checkbook to work with.
 

Jumba72

Junior
Nov 27, 2005
2,439
247
0
Now go check the Victoria Secret show on CBS. Can't seem to post a new thread.

This post was edited on 2/26 10:03 PM by Jumba72
 

apgoosebumps

Sophomore
Sep 26, 2003
1,469
104
0
Originally posted by Jumba72:
You guys are nuts. Lou still has some mulligans left. Besides, its not like he's had an open checkbook to work with.
I haven't been happy with Lou in over 10 years but gave him a 10 year untouchable status after the last cup. Its now been 13 years and outside of a lucky run in 2012 the Devils haven't done anything.

1. Letting Parise walk away for nothing- If he thought there was any chance of not signing him you trade him for multiple first round picks in todays NHL!!!!
2. In addition hes let Clarkson, Nidermayer, Raflaski, Gionta, Paul Martin walk away for nothing
2. Terrible free agent signings over the past decade Clowe, Ryder, Volchenkov, Tallinder to name a few
3. Giving Zajac a big contract and resigning Salvador for 3 years
4. Drafting has been terrible. We have zero forwards in the system

Today's trade is one of the best moves Lou has made in years!!!
 

Jumba72

Junior
Nov 27, 2005
2,439
247
0
1) He offered more that Minny. Noone was giving away multiple 1sts, even if they had them, for a 1yr rental. Certainly not Minny.

2) Nieds wanted to go home and play with his brother. Raf was in the doghouse. Clarkson and Gionta had little value. PM was overpaid.

3 4 5) faire points.

He doesn't have even the bankroll he used to.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,034
17,658
97
Agree with most points..

But the Leafs just traded away Clarkson for nothing.

The Ckarkson non-signing was genius.
 

RU old timer

Junior
Feb 26, 2015
594
316
0
Lou and our Vivian have something in common. At their peak...defensive brilliance in management (lou) and coaching (Vivian). But weak on offense (roster makeup for Lou), coaching for Vivian.
 

RUaMoose_rivals

All-American
Oct 31, 2004
17,237
7,058
0
Originally posted by apgoosebumps:

Originally posted by Jumba72:
You guys are nuts. Lou still has some mulligans left. Besides, its not like he's had an open checkbook to work with.
I haven't been happy with Lou in over 10 years but gave him a 10 year untouchable status after the last cup. Its now been 13 years and outside of a lucky run in 2012 the Devils haven't done anything.

1. Letting Parise walk away for nothing- If he thought there was any chance of not signing him you trade him for multiple first round picks in todays NHL!!!!
2. In addition hes let Clarkson, Nidermayer, Raflaski, Gionta, Paul Martin walk away for nothing
2. Terrible free agent signings over the past decade Clowe, Ryder, Volchenkov, Tallinder to name a few
3. Giving Zajac a big contract and resigning Salvador for 3 years
4. Drafting has been terrible. We have zero forwards in the system

Today's trade is one of the best moves Lou has made in years!!!
How many times we have to discuss this? Lou didn't "let" Parise go. IIRC, he was offered the same money Minn offered. Clarkson ? Please. The guy wanted way too much money for what he was, a gritty winger who had one good year. Can't blame LL for letting that one go. Neids wanted to play with his brother. Rafalski is from MI so LL was up against it there. Can't argue about Clowe and some of the other FA signings. All teams lose FA and all teams sign some flops, not just the Devils. IMHO, Lou's biggest blunder was screwing around and getting caught trying to work around the cap to sign Kovalchuk. That cost the Devils a high first round pick and one or two other lower picks ( a 3rd and a 4th, IIRC).
 

RUaMoose_rivals

All-American
Oct 31, 2004
17,237
7,058
0
Originally posted by tuffer76:
Great trade for Devils. They got great value for a 43 year old rental. I've questioned Lou in the last couple of years but I think recently his moves have been better. He had a rough spell with the Zajac contract, not forfeiting the pick in the Stanley Cup year, etc. problem is the team is so old up front and no youth in the system. All prospects are defenseman and he's going to havevtobtrade one or two to get young skill guys.
I'd like to see how Stefan Matteau develops before I kill LL for that. I always wondered, at what point did LL have to declare he was forfeiting that pick ? Was it before the draft began or as late as when you're on the clock to pick a player ? If it's the latter, perhaps Lou saw a guy like Matteau as being long gone by pick 30, saw great value and decided to go for it. If that was the case, I can't kill him.
 

tuffer76

Senior
Sep 19, 2005
1,411
639
113
The timing doesn't matter. If you have to forfeit a pick in the next three drafts you give up he 29th pick when you have the chance. It's a no brainer. Chances the pick will be that low again in next two years are slim. It's about assets and he drafted yet another high-motor checking winner and gave up a likely better pick in a future year. He got lucky the NHL bailed him out last year and gave him the 30th pick. Even if Matteau turns out to be a good player (possibly a second line winger is his ceiling) it was still a bad choice because it was a bad bet.
 

JMORC2003

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2008
4,609
2,535
0
I think Clarkson would have been better staying in NJ w/ PDB's system than he ended up being in Toronto. Not 30 goals a year good, that was a fluke, but better than he was for Tor where his claim to fame was vehemently defending his goalie's water bottle. Still, Lou would have been crazy to pay him more than the Leafs did, so no issue with letting him walk.

I don't blame him for Parise, and certainly not Kovy's retirement. I do think he didn't do nearly enough to fill that hole. They're both elite players, and you can't replace with Zajac, Zubrus, Henrique, and Clowe. This isn't the 90s/early 2000s. You need stars, not role players and has beens.

The Schneider trade was a big move. Moment of clarity, perhaps.
 

sherrane

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2003
10,560
1,309
0
Originally posted by mikemarc1:

Originally posted by mikemarc1:
Guess signaling Lou Lamoriello is giving up on the season.

Not bad return for him..I was hoping for a 3rd round pick..but the Panthers gave up a 2nd round pick this season..and a 3rd round pick next year. Nice get for NJ.
Not surprised he was traded either...kinda surprising that Florida went all in on him and he agreed to go there.

It's not like they're a lock for the playoffs. i thought he'd go somewhere guaranteed a spot. Not complaining though.

Time for the rebuild. Hopefully Zidlicky and Ryder are the next to go.
Florida needs a playoff birth to breathe some life into the "fan base". They're only 2 points out of a playoff birth although Boston has a game in hand. I think they'll fall short because they have a fairly difficult schedule starting in two weeks. They play Buffalo, Tampa, Toronto, Dallas, Islanders, Winnipeg, and Carolina before the schedule gets much tougher. They need at least 9 points in these 7 games to have a chance.
 

apgoosebumps

Sophomore
Sep 26, 2003
1,469
104
0
You're missing my point... it doesn't matter what we offered Parise, Lou should have gotten rid of him once there was a high chance he was going to hit UFA status. (which was obvious the year before when he only signed a one year deal).

It pains me to say this but Lou should take a page out of Sather's book. Once Sather realizes a player is not going to sign for what he wants to offer, Sather trades him for something before they inevitably reach UFA status. (Dubinsky, Callahan, and now its rumored he is shopping Zuc)
How many times we have to discuss this? Lou didn't "let" Parise go. IIRC, he was offered the same money Minn offered. Clarkson ? Please. The guy wanted way too much money for what he was, a gritty winger who had one good year. Can't blame LL for letting that one go. Neids wanted to play with his brother. Rafalski is from MI so LL was up against it there. Can't argue about Clowe and some of the other FA signings. All teams lose FA and all teams sign some flops, not just the Devils. IMHO, Lou's biggest blunder was screwing around and getting caught trying to work around the cap to sign Kovalchuk. That cost the Devils a high first round pick and one or two other lower picks ( a 3rd and a 4th, IIRC).
 

tuffer76

Senior
Sep 19, 2005
1,411
639
113
The only problem is that while Lou knew Parise was going to be an UFA, he knew that he'd have a chance to sign him. Parise was torn between staying a Devil and going home to Minnesota. It wasn't a forgone conclusion that he was going to walk.

Sather knows that guys like Callaha (last year) and Zuccarello (this year) are definitely gone if he tries to hang on to them because their demands are way more than he's willing to pay. So he gets something in return while he can. It's not the same situation as the Devils had with Parise.
 

apgoosebumps

Sophomore
Sep 26, 2003
1,469
104
0
I'm of the opinion you give the player your best offer the year before he hits ufa....If he doesn't take it then chances are very slim hes not going to take it once he hits free agency.

I still remember the sinking feeling when I heard Parise had only signed a 1 year deal and would be an unrestricted free agent the next year. I never believed a word that came out of his mouth that entire year as to me the writing was already on the wall.
 

JerseyPride13

Redshirt
Aug 16, 2007
66,170
2
0
Originally posted by apgoosebumps:
You're missing my point... it doesn't matter what we offered Parise, Lou should have gotten rid of him once there was a high chance he was going to hit UFA status. (which was obvious the year before when he only signed a one year deal).

It pains me to say this but Lou should take a page out of Sather's book. Once Sather realizes a player is not going to sign for what he wants to offer, Sather trades him for something before they inevitably reach UFA status. (Dubinsky, Callahan, and now its rumored he is shopping Zuc)
How many times we have to discuss this? Lou didn't "let" Parise go. IIRC, he was offered the same money Minn offered. Clarkson ? Please. The guy wanted way too much money for what he was, a gritty winger who had one good year. Can't blame LL for letting that one go. Neids wanted to play with his brother. Rafalski is from MI so LL was up against it there. Can't argue about Clowe and some of the other FA signings. All teams lose FA and all teams sign some flops, not just the Devils. IMHO, Lou's biggest blunder was screwing around and getting caught trying to work around the cap to sign Kovalchuk. That cost the Devils a high first round pick and one or two other lower picks ( a 3rd and a 4th, IIRC).
I disagree with you on Parise as well. Looking back, it obviously did not work the way that we, (Devils Fans) wanted it to work out but hindsight is 20/20. The fact is that Parise was very close to resigning with the Devils and I am not sure if you know this but so was Ryan Suter. There have been numerous reports that both Parise and Suter were talking to Brodeur about signing to play for the Devils. If things worked that way, we would be sitting here praising Lou about the move instead of arguing about it.

Parise and Suter to NJ...