POLL: Your Choice for Next PSU Head Coach?

Who is your choice for PSU's next HC?


  • Total voters
    357
  • Poll closed .

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,002
2,746
113
What am I speculating about? I said kraft has plenty of cash and wants to swing for the fences?
I clearly stated what you were speculating about - that he wasn't making this move to save his job.
 

Ram20

All-Conference
Jul 29, 2013
578
1,171
93
I clearly stated what you were speculating about - that he wasn't making this move to save his job.
Oh, you think the board directed Kraft to make this move in order to save his own ***? Wow, now that is a bit of speculation I can' begin to fathom. Either way, if true, my original point remains....good on not only kraft, but the board striving for greatness and not merely complacency.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,002
2,746
113
Oh, you think the board directed Kraft to make this move in order to save his own ***? Wow, now that is a bit of speculation I can' begin to fathom. Either way, if true, my original point remains....good on not only kraft, but the board striving for greatness and not merely complacency.
Holy crap, guy ... I said we can't know. I mean, I wrote it all out. Very clearly. No, I don't think what you claim I think ... I said we don't know either way, so it's all rank speculation. I said that the first time. I'm saying it again. Let's see how you mess this one up.

This was all from you assuming that Kraft didn't make this move because he was worried about his job ... he's taking a big risk and letting it all hang out there. I'm saying we don't know. This could have actually been the low risk move that could be an attempt to save his job.

Yes, these guys worry about money. He makes a couple mill a year. While that's certainly above average, compared to your average schlub, it's not eff you money ... you start making money like that and you adjust your standard of living upward (and that costs more) ... and you also know that you haven't making near that for most of your career and it could all go away tomorrow if you don't play your cards right ... plus, most people are motivated to provide more for their family, regardless of what they make.
 

Ram20

All-Conference
Jul 29, 2013
578
1,171
93
Holy crap, guy ... I said we can't know. I mean, I wrote it all out. Very clearly. No, I don't think what you claim I think ... I said we don't know either way, so it's all rank speculation. I said that the first time. I'm saying it again. Let's see how you mess this one up.

This was all from you assuming that Kraft didn't make this move because he was worried about his job ... he's taking a big risk and letting it all hang out there. I'm saying we don't know. This could have actually been the low risk move that could be an attempt to save his job.

Yes, these guys worry about money. He makes a couple mill a year. While that's certainly above average, compared to your average schlub, it's not eff you money ... you start making money like that and you adjust your standard of living upward (and that costs more) ... and you also know that you haven't making near that for most of your career and it could all go away tomorrow if you don't play your cards right ... plus, most people are motivated to provide more for their family, regardless of what they make.
Okay...I mean 90% of this board is speculation, conjecture and opinions, I guess Im just a little suprised my post about Kraft swinging for the fences and not merely concerning himself with job stability was mild on the speculation meter at best to be the one you single out. Either way, yes....im speculating with no inside knowledge(just his press conference) that perhaps we have an AD(or a board) that is more interested in championships than job security....I'll admit it could be untrue.
 

cjrugger

All-American
Dec 13, 2017
2,509
5,040
113
According to this poll, Bryan Hartline is not hated after all.

The issue with every one of these names is that this search won't make it into December and none of these guys with the exception of Rhule will be available then.

But I know who is: Urban.
No way we’re eliminating the best candidates so that the search can be done by December
 

Bvillebaron

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2004
2,657
2,676
113
Well, I guess whoever coaches will get fired if they don’t win a Natty year 1. You know that’s the goal Kraft said but there is something acceptable about falling short. For example, should Georgia have fired Kirby after last year?
Well there is this pesky difference about Kirby winning a Natty.
 

Bvillebaron

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2004
2,657
2,676
113
Success with Honor never truly existed anyway...it was a brilliant plan by Paterno to have lowered expectations as the fans would dismiss losses because we did the right things.
You must have been born after the National Championships in 1982 and 1986 huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MtNittany

Bvillebaron

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2004
2,657
2,676
113
Of course we don't know this ... retaining his job could hinge on football success, and it could have been communicated that Franklin wasn't cutting it. So, he very well could have made this move to retain his job.

Or, maybe not.

Why do we continue to speculate on things, and present these rank speculations as facts, when we don't have a clue?
Or maybe Kraft was a micromanaging jerk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G3624

Classof09

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,100
2,272
113
Well there is this pesky difference about Kirby winning a Natty.
So based on this, your criteria is Kraft can hire only coaches who have won a previous NC (upsets don’t matter there) or a coach that has never been upset, but hasn’t won a NC?

Guess it’s Dabo, Kirby and Day, or bring back Saban or Urban. None of those seem likely to me.

Leaving you with Option 2 - not sure no coach hasn’t been upset.

I still stand by the idea that Freeman is a home run candidate for all the reasons I listed earlier. He is not CJF (won ‘big’ games), his recruiting outpaces PSUs (by a widening margin), and he seems to be the recruiter/game manager/face of program while hiring good coordinators and position coaches to do the coaching (Seider for one).

Dismissing him as a candidate because his team lost to 1 non-P4 school each of the last 2 years seems shortsighted since his team played for a Natty last year after beating PSU and having a harder path to the NC than our draw was. And he stands a good chance of making the playoffs again this year, if they win Saturday night. I dislike ND as much as anybody, but I’m not letting that distract from the idea that hiring Freeman seems like a huge win for Kraft if he can pull it off.

Has anybody also considered the Singleton drop off could be somewhat related to Seider leaving? Not sure - just speculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 84lion

Midnighter

Heisman
Jan 22, 2021
11,476
18,923
113
So based on this, your criteria is Kraft can hire only coaches who have won a previous NC (upsets don’t matter there) or a coach that has never been upset, but hasn’t won a NC?

Guess it’s Dabo, Kirby and Day, or bring back Saban or Urban. None of those seem likely to me.

Leaving you with Option 2 - not sure no coach hasn’t been upset.

I still stand by the idea that Freeman is a home run candidate for all the reasons I listed earlier. He is not CJF (won ‘big’ games), his recruiting outpaces PSUs (by a widening margin), and he seems to be the recruiter/game manager/face of program while hiring good coordinators and position coaches to do the coaching (Seider for one).

Dismissing him as a candidate because his team lost to 1 non-P4 school each of the last 2 years seems shortsighted since his team played for a Natty last year after beating PSU and having a harder path to the NC than our draw was. And he stands a good chance of making the playoffs again this year, if they win Saturday night. I dislike ND as much as anybody, but I’m not letting that distract from the idea that hiring Freeman seems like a huge win for Kraft if he can pull it off.

Has anybody also considered the Singleton drop off could be somewhat related to Seider leaving? Not sure - just speculation.

You forgot one....

 

CVLion

All-Conference
Oct 13, 2021
880
1,755
93
And it was brilliant...he lowered expectation. Not really sure how you think that proves me wrong. Before all his undefeated seasons is exactly my point.

I have to disagree… if he did not yet have undefeated seasons and NCs under his belt, exactly what expectations were there to lower at that point?

You actually used the “Success With Honor” phrase in your assertion about lowering expectations. As I recall, that specific motto came around later on, maybe not until the 90s. So I thought you were implying he believed the on-field success up through the 80s would not be sustainable as the sport evolved and Joe intended to continue demanding integrity and academic diligence out of his athletes — thereby trying to “lower expectations” AT THAT TIME, when some actual expectations had emerged.

And MY point was that “Success With Honor” had existed in spirit, under the “Grand Experiment” parlance, from the very beginning… when Joe had no track record yet and thus there was no national prominence for fans to even “expect.”

Now that I know you meant he was trying to lower expectations from the very beginning (or you’re trying to retrofit that meaning onto your earlier post), the stink of BS on your insinuation has become even raunchier.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,809
2,892
113
I have to disagree… if he did not yet have undefeated seasons and NCs under his belt, exactly what expectations were there to lower at that point?

You actually used the “Success With Honor” phrase in your assertion about lowering expectations. As I recall, that specific motto came around later on, maybe not until the 90s. So I thought you were implying he believed the on-field success up through the 80s would not be sustainable as the sport evolved and Joe intended to continue demanding integrity and academic diligence out of his athletes — thereby trying to “lower expectations” AT THAT TIME, when some actual expectations had emerged.

And MY point was that “Success With Honor” had existed in spirit, under the “Grand Experiment” parlance, from the very beginning… when Joe had no track record yet and thus there was no national prominence for fans to even “expect.”

Now that I know you meant he was trying to lower expectations from the very beginning (or you’re trying to retrofit that meaning onto your earlier post), the stink of BS on your insinuation has become even raunchier.
Correct...the phrase came much later on but claiming we were doing things the right way and attacking others created room for error.

I dont know why everyone takes offense to his. It's why O'Brien discussed their being a cult.

Paterno was a great man and a great coach. He genuinely cared about his players. He was smarter than people give him credit for and understood how to achieve his goals. You're taking this as an insult. It's not. It's praise.

We just can't live in the past forever as some want. See those that want Rhule or Smith.
 
Oct 6, 2012
2,777
728
113
I am a 65 yo Nebraska fan grown up in Lincoln. This is eerily familiar to us firing Solich way back when we began our plunge.

I am ambivalent about Rhule leaving or staying, but us Huskers wished for better too, when things were really going well.

In full disclosure, I voted Rhule as your next coach.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,002
2,746
113
Okay...I mean 90% of this board is speculation, conjecture and opinions, I guess Im just a little suprised my post about Kraft swinging for the fences and not merely concerning himself with job stability was mild on the speculation meter at best to be the one you single out. Either way, yes....im speculating with no inside knowledge(just his press conference) that perhaps we have an AD(or a board) that is more interested in championships than job security....I'll admit it could be untrue.

You could have just cut out everything in your post, except for the last 6 words.

Regardless ... consider your assertion that this is Kraft being bold and brash and not caring about his job security ... he's throwing caution to the wind and swinging for the fences ... according to just about everyone on this board, the consecutive losses when we were heavy favorites made it so that Franklin had to go. According to just about everyone else who has been so excited for this happening, Franklin had proven he couldn't win the big game, and now he'd lost the team, the media, the boosters, his daughters took out an ad looking for a new daddy, his dog wouldn't let CJF take him for a walk ... everyone gave up on him. So wouldn't it be exactly job security and the safe call to can Franklin? Wouldn't it be much riskier to keep him on? Or even stand up and say "this is our guy ... if you have a problem with it, there's the door"? If mostly everyone is to be believed, this was the "only" reasonable option ... therefore, it's the safe way out.
 

Classof09

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,100
2,272
113
why would urban and saben leave those cush jobs, paying big bucks, for a head coaching job with all kinds pressure and headaches?
My point exactly. Never said they would leave their gigs. I said I didn’t see either of them being a candidate.
 

Ram20

All-Conference
Jul 29, 2013
578
1,171
93
You could have just cut out everything in your post, except for the last 6 words.

Regardless ... consider your assertion that this is Kraft being bold and brash and not caring about his job security ... he's throwing caution to the wind and swinging for the fences ... according to just about everyone on this board, the consecutive losses when we were heavy favorites made it so that Franklin had to go. According to just about everyone else who has been so excited for this happening, Franklin had proven he couldn't win the big game, and now he'd lost the team, the media, the boosters, his daughters took out an ad looking for a new daddy, his dog wouldn't let CJF take him for a walk ... everyone gave up on him. So wouldn't it be exactly job security and the safe call to can Franklin? Wouldn't it be much riskier to keep him on? Or even stand up and say "this is our guy ... if you have a problem with it, there's the door"? If mostly everyone is to be believed, this was the "only" reasonable option ... therefore, it's the safe way out.
Sorry if you thought my post was windy, however, your's is so long I cant spend the time. I'll be sure to preface every post with this "is just speculation" or "just my $0.2 cents" as to make it obvious to you. I do hope you'll hold every poster to the same standard. I believe 90% of the current threads are speculative and truly lacking inside knowledge.....probably because its a free message board and the school just underwent a huge change.
 
Last edited:
Oct 12, 2021
147
274
63
That’s fair. But that also doesn’t mean he’s a good fit at PSU. Places like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, etc have hired the new, up and coming guy and it didn’t work because they weren’t a good fit. Look at Wisconsin with Fickell now. He was widely considered a very, very good coach with all the success he had at Cincinnati and he was the hot coaching commodity. However, he looks way in over his head at Wisconsin. I’m sure Campbell is a good coach, but does he give PSU the edge to get the top recruits and beat the likes of Ryan Day, Dan Lanning, etc? I also still think of Iowa St as a wrestling school, FWIW.
Iowa state…. Basketball school😊