RAC renovation

fatsam98

Heisman
Mar 23, 2005
42,326
34,934
113
I wish we had started the RAC renovation/replacement job this year. There has been little to no home court advantage since the team can't score and most fans understandably get bored by halftime.

When the renovations do start, I hope we will build extra comfortable seats reserved for football recruits at the bottom of the student section. We need to catch up with the other B1G schools that take care of their future athletes.
Your troll game is deteriorating. I expect a better effort than this
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickRU714

Rutgers2024

Redshirt
Mar 16, 2023
6
12
0
Do the best possible job on renovating the RAC. Losing one season of home games is meaningless in the big picture. Plus, this year's team didn't even play well at home. We should announce that the 2024-25 season's games will be played elsewhere and then get started as soon as next season is over. Do this right!
 
Sep 29, 2005
14,051
16,131
0
Do the best possible job on renovating the RAC. Losing one season of home games is meaningless in the big picture. Plus, this year's team didn't even play well at home. We should announce that the 2024-25 season's games will be played elsewhere and then get started as soon as next season is over. Do this right!
Did you listen to Hobb's interview and his comment on not having to leave the RAC for renovations?
 

needmorecowbell

All-American
Oct 28, 2007
9,133
9,998
78
Thankfully Hobbs has stated they are doing everything possible to avoid leaving the RAC for a season. But troll on.
I am happy to say I was wrong. Everything I heard from people who know, said RU was going to be shutting down the RAC for a year. Sounds like the plans may change or shift if the renovation is reduced or done in multiple off seasons.
 

needmorecowbell

All-American
Oct 28, 2007
9,133
9,998
78
Than let’s compare the Alumni Hall one instead.
That (assuming you mean Assembly Hall) might be a real comparison. The one that made most sense to me was Cincinnati. It is very similar to what Rutgers was proposing. The major difference between the RAC and Assembly Hall is RU wants to add the bowl concourse around the arena. That’s is a major construction job and that may need to change if they don’t want to shut down for a year.


This took 18 months and Cincy played at Northern Kentucky while it was being renovated. Almost identical to what RU proposed.
 
Last edited:

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,650
52,266
102
That might be a real comparison. The one that made most sense to me was Cincinnati. It is very similar to what Rutgers was proposing.


This took 18 months and they played at Northern Kentucky while it was being renovated.
But the Hoosiers never left.🙂

And I don’t like this part of the Cincinnati reno…

“The project would reduce the amount of seating,…”

Also, where they ended up playing was only like 3 miles away.
 
Last edited:

needmorecowbell

All-American
Oct 28, 2007
9,133
9,998
78
But the Hoosiers never left.🙂

And I don’t like this part of the Cincinnati reno…

“The project would reduce the amount of seating,…”

Also, where they ended up playing was only like 3 miles away.
You’re missing the point. Adding a bowl concourse is a huge job. Much different than Indiana. They may have to scrap that part if they don’t want to shut down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers2024

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,650
52,266
102
You’re missing the point. Adding a bowl concourse is a huge job. Much different than Indiana. They may have to scrap that part if they don’t want to shut down.
Is that what the renderings actually show? Seems like Cincy still have sliders on the sidelines.

Indiana did a ton of work out front which I assume is what we plan to do. Or is that going to be on the side now?
 

needmorecowbell

All-American
Oct 28, 2007
9,133
9,998
78
Is that what the renderings actually show? Seems like Cincy still have sliders on the sidelines.

Indiana did a ton of work out front which I assume is what we plan to do. Or is that going to be on the side now?
The renderings do show a bowl but I don’t think it will look anything like those renderings. The work outside is most likely very easy to complete without interruption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,650
52,266
102
The renderings do show a bowl but I don’t think it will look anything like those renderings. The work outside is most likely very easy to complete without interruption.
Flow is hopefully being considered as a top thing to be changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wheezer

adamchas

Sophomore
Dec 12, 2007
226
163
43
Do the best possible job on renovating the RAC. Losing one season of home games is meaningless in the big picture. Plus, this year's team didn't even play well at home. We should announce that the 2024-25 season's games will be played elsewhere and then get started as soon as next season is over. Do this right!
Your handle implies you graduate in 2024...of course you are fine with the RAC being shutdown the following season 😂
 

RU-ROCS

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
12,206
7,281
113
If MSG can be renovated without losing a season for the Knicks or Rangers then we can do it at RU. Year 1 build the exterior structures to expand the entrance and concourse, including bathrooms etc. Year 2 work on the interior seating
Not a great example. The MSG renovation was one of the most expensive renovations anywhere, ever - $1.2 BILLION. For that price, the could do anything.
 

Rutgers2024

Redshirt
Mar 16, 2023
6
12
0
I think Hobbs referenced the Northwest reno as a blueprint they may follow
FYI - Northwestern closed their arena for 18 months for the reno.
Exactly. And just because Hobbs says the “goal” is to not leave the RAC means nothing. He’s just hedging. The team could and should leave the RAC for a year to make sure this project gets done correctly. Who cares about one season if it means we get a huge facility upgrade that will help recruiting and the university itself? The whiners should think bigger.
 
Last edited:

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,069
6,303
113
Exactly. And just because Hobbs says the “goal” is to not leave the RAC means nothing. He’s just hedging. The team could and should leave the RAC for a year to make sure this projects gets done correctly. Who cares about one season if it means we get a huge facility upgrade that will help recruiting and the university itself? The whiners should think bigger.

I’m not sure what’s bigger than potentially having a top 3 class in 2024 with some guys who only stay one year and giving up the RAC to play at some other random building.

Whiners? Haha.
 

rutobs

Senior
Jan 26, 2012
322
402
63
Do it in the offseason

Start the day after the season, ask the B1G for help scheduling conference opponents next year to later in the year if possible (if things look meh during Central CT state, who cares)

It's not difficult. More costly, yes. But it can, and needs to be done, this way. End of story
Do it in the off season and make it a 2-year project if you have to. I agree that we must play our home games here.
 

jerseybird

Senior
Jul 31, 2001
522
558
93
Exactly. And just because Hobbs says the “goal” is to not leave the RAC means nothing. He’s just hedging. The team could and should leave the RAC for a year to make sure this project gets done correctly. Who cares about one season if it means we get a huge facility upgrade that will help recruiting and the university itself? The whiners should think bigger.
Hobbs wasn't hedging. Two off-seasons consist of 17-18 months. Much can get done in a 8 1/2-9-month stretch.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,004
24,601
113
I’m not sure what’s bigger than potentially having a top 3 class in 2024 with some guys who only stay one year and giving up the RAC to play at some other random building.

Whiners? Haha.
If we could get a top 3 class, I vote for that and have the renovation a year or two after
We may not have this recruiting opportunity again and you don’t screw that up
We can exist in the RAC as it is for a while
 
  • Like
Reactions: Njcanesfan

Njcanesfan

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2005
2,348
2,413
113
Exactly. And just because Hobbs says the “goal” is to not leave the RAC means nothing. He’s just hedging. The team could and should leave the RAC for a year to make sure this project gets done correctly. Who cares about one season if it means we get a huge facility upgrade that will help recruiting and the university itself? The whiners should think bigger.
People missed that part. lol. The goal.

Had the same exact thought.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,255
0
People just *****---he mentioned two arenas that were redone by the same company while still playing in them and that's why Rutgers hired them for the RAC. That's the plan --not to play any home games away from the RAC--can anyone guarantee anything in life--no --but he has no reason to make things up. Stop the nonsense about Hobbs.
 

Southern Gentleman

All-Conference
Aug 10, 2011
7,315
3,928
0
Remodeling an arena makes sense IF:

1. You can afford it
2. Will help to generate more income to service the debt
3. Will assist in recruiting
4. Enhances the college basketball experience for students to attend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AreYouNUTS