Toggle sidebar

This was push back against the B1G. And I almost get it.

R

RutgersClassof2004

All-Conference
Feb 23, 2020
3,055
2,794
113
Arizona Knight said:
it’s a bad look to keep disappointing in March especially when liking into the tournament with 10 teams.

Of course we would be the sacrificial lamb. We absolutely deserved to be in. Such a d!ck punch.
Click to expand...
Yep. It was a very likely call. I said it and got panned here. These bracketologists are a joke. They were all wrong! My Trump test was right.
 
S

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
7,957
10,385
113
And it’s a statement that you can’t have 3+ quad 3/4 losses. No matter what your Q1 record is.

And if you lose a key player , you better not be in the bubble convo
 
B

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,609
12,589
66
Conference keeps pissing in its pants year after year in tourney.

Plus this year conference is full of 8-10 seeds and there wasn’t much opportunity for huge wins albeit we were 2-2 vs Purdue and Indiana. Only top seeds on conference.

Bottom line is we blew it with how we ended season losing to Nebraska / Minnesota / Michigan and NW.

Committee did us a favor last year and was not going to give us a favor 2 years in a row.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedTeam1994, RutgersClassof2004 and RUskoolie
R

RCBeta79

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2013
1,058
1,045
0
Illinois played its way into a bubble team, but still got into the tournament.

Close record to Rutgers and played poorly down the stretch.
 
R

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
25,977
12,152
113
I hope this will be a learning lesson for Rutgers where the team can't be outstanding on defense and mediocre on offense and expect the NCAA Committee will select them.The team played hard but lacked go to scorers to halt scoring droughts and making shots at crunch time.There will be a need to change the roster for next season bringing in players that can create shots off the dribble.There also must be a change in the half court offense to create open 3 point shots.Rutgers needs more points from the 3 point line.Bracketology clearly didn't work for Rutgers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersClassof2004
4

4IUSox2

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
6,673
3,946
0
While I certainly agree RU got screwed, I also concur this is a big middle finger to the league as a whole by these smaller conference ADs. They are envious of the kind of dough this conference rakes in and this how they get their pound of flesh.
 
C

combes

Heisman
Jul 10, 2001
36,254
10,765
0
RCBeta79 said:
Illinois played its way into a bubble team, but still got into the tournament.

Close record to Rutgers and played poorly down the stretch.
Click to expand...
Never a bubble team. Never mentioned as a bubble team. Beat UCLA and Texas. Beat Rutgers head to head.

Should they have been better? Sure. But replacing 5 starters turned out to be harder than many thought.
 
F

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
RUJMM78 said:
I hope this will be a learning lesson for Rutgers where the team can't be outstanding on defense and mediocre on offense and expect the NCAA Committee will select them.The team played hard but lacked go to scorers to halt scoring droughts and making shots at crunch time.There will be a need to change the roster for next season bringing in players that can create shots off the dribble.There also must be a change in the half court offense to create open 3 point shots.Rutgers needs more points from the 3 point line.Bracketology clearly didn't work for Rutgers.
Click to expand...
Just win games, no one cares if it's using offense or defense. Win more games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roy_Faulker
DirtyRU

DirtyRU

All-American
Nov 16, 2002
6,505
6,073
113
ScarletKid2008 said:
And it’s a statement that you can’t have 3+ quad 3/4 losses. No matter what your Q1 record is.

And if you lose a key player , you better not be in the bubble convo
Click to expand...
Check #8-seed Iowa's quad 3&4 record and get back to me. And that's just one team... and an EIGHT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigantor1024
D

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,816
0
DirtyRU said:
Check #8-seed Iowa's quad 3&4 record and get back to me. And that's just one team... and an EIGHT.
Click to expand...
very interesting. BUT then the spin will be the Q1/Q2 record with loses to Duke and TCU..but wins 3 wins vs. SHU, Iowa St. and Clemson?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU
A

Arizona Knight

All-American
Jun 25, 2001
16,672
9,929
56
FinalFourOrBust said:
No one is making excuses? You’re literally making up conspiracy theories. Cliff, cam and Caleb are undoubtedly more important than mag. Sorry dude.
Click to expand...

Not a conspiracy theory. Just having an understanding of human nature and again, I kind of agree with where the Committee is coming from you can’t keep underperforming as a conference and expect to squeeze nine or ten teams in.

This is why I root for the conference in the NCAA and in the Football playoffs. Not everyone gets why that’s important but hopefully today serves as a reminder for next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tulloal
F

FinalFourOrBust_rivals142702

All-Conference
Dec 5, 2022
1,346
1,664
0
Arizona Knight said:
Not a conspiracy theory. Just having an understanding of human nature and again, I kind of agree with where the Committee is coming from you can’t keep underperforming as a conference and expect to squeeze nine or ten teams in.

This is why I root for the conference in the NCAA and in the Football playoffs. Not everyone gets why that’s important but hopefully today serves as a reminder for next year.
Click to expand...
Basically the definition of a conspiracy theory
 
M

motorb54

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2005
9,922
4,233
113
Make the f**kin" free throws at the end of Ohio State and Minnesota.
Or Call a time out at Minnesota to set up the D.
And whoever the refs were at Ohio State **** YOU!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh
R

RedTeam1994

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,254
6,051
0
Going by the numbers our snub literally makes ZERO SENSE

IMHO this was all about the committee not wanting to give the big10 nine teams - and we were #9 in their eyes.

And considering the Big10s performance (or lack thereof) last few years - not surprising

Since the #s make no sense the “Big10 snub” theory is the only one that makes sense to me
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arizona Knight
R

RedTeam1994

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,254
6,051
0
fluoxetine said:
The #s make a bit more sense when you realize they don't give a **** what your NET or kenpom ratings are.
Click to expand...
Then that just means they change the rules year to year since I thought NET was really important as recently as last year …. No?
 
F

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
RedTeam1994 said:
Then that just means they change the rules year to year since I thought NET was really important as recently as last year …. No?
Click to expand...
It wasn't important last year either. A lot of people have said it is but they are pretty clearly wrong. It's being used to sort the quads, and look at the strength of wins and losses. It's not being directly used (much) to select the field.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom