Vaccines for children

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,838
19,879
113

And this is why public health is poised to tank in this country because millions of people like you will listen to this man, believe what he says and spread his misinformation far and wide. How many will have to die so maga can own the libs?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Does the efficacy of the covid vaccine plummet into negative territory after 7 months?

The efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines does not plummet into negative territory after 7 months, based on available evidence. Negative efficacy would imply that vaccinated individuals are more likely to contract COVID-19 than unvaccinated individuals, which is not supported by data. Instead, studies show that vaccine effectiveness wanes over time but generally remains positive, particularly against severe outcomes.

Against Infection: Studies indicate that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 and overall infection decreases over time. For example, a 2023 study found that after 6 months, the effectiveness of primary series vaccines (e.g., Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) against symptomatic infection dropped to 14% and to 9% after 9 months during the Omicron wave. Protection against infection fell from 44.4% at 1 month to 20.7% at 6 months and 13.4% at 9 months. However, these values remain positive, not negative.

Against Severe Outcomes: Vaccines maintain higher efficacy against hospitalization and death for longer periods. A Penn State study showed that immunity against severe COVID-19 remained around 90% for up to 6 months for Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, though it was lower (74%) for Johnson & Johnson.

Omicron Impact: The emergence of variants like Omicron reduced baseline vaccine effectiveness compared to earlier variants like Delta, but it did not result in negative efficacy. Booster doses restored protection to higher levels, though this also waned over time (e.g., from 60% at 1 month post-booster to 13% at 9 months).

Immune Memory: Research on the Moderna vaccine showed strong immune memory (antibodies and T cells) persisting 6 months post-vaccination, even at low doses, supporting sustained protection against severe disease.

Some narratives, particularly from vaccine-skeptical sources, have claimed negative efficacy based on observational data showing higher case rates in vaccinated groups over time. However, these interpretations often fail to account for confounding factors like prior immunity, testing biases, or variant-specific immune evasion. For instance, if unvaccinated individuals have higher rates of prior infection, their baseline immunity could skew comparisons. No peer-reviewed studies in the provided data confirm negative efficacy after 7 months.

In summary, while vaccine efficacy against infection wanes significantly by 7 months, especially against Omicron, it does not become negative. Protection against severe outcomes remains robust for at least 6 months, and boosters can help restore efficacy. Always consider variant-specific data and individual risk factors when evaluating vaccine performance









 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,838
19,879
113
You’re fired


LMAO at "permanently destroyed maininstream medicine." Can you explain how what he does in his off-time is causing that kind of catastrophic damage? Because I can think of much, much worse.

I've even heard there is a strange guy in the health agencies who did heroin for 14 years, is a serial adulterer, dumps dead bears in Central Park, cuts the heads off whale carcasses, and is a batshit conspiracy theorist with a worm in his brain.
_____________________________________

"The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has begun eliminating some 10,000 jobs as announced by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a staggering shrinkage of the department’s workforce and consolidation of programs that some former officials and others warned would decimate U.S. life sciences activity, from academic research to industry drug development and regulation to public health oversight.

The 10,000 jobs being eliminated include 3,500 positions at the FDA, 2,400 at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and 1,200 at the NIH. Another 300 positions will also be eliminated at the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. HHS has said the job cuts and its restructuring of operations will save $1.8 billion a year, eliminate bureaucracy and waste, and enhance the agencies’ ability to conduct essential functions."

“The FDA as we’ve known it is finished,” declared Califf in a post on LinkedIn. “Most of the leaders with institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of product development and safety [are] no longer employed.”

“I believe that history will see this [as] a huge mistake.
I will be glad if I’m proven wrong, but even then there is no good reason to treat people this way,” Califf continued. “It will be interesting to hear from the new leadership how they plan to put ‘Humpty Dumpty’ back together again.”

Added Tom Frieden, MD, who served as CDC director during the Obama administration (2009–2017): “This is a recipe for more illness, higher healthcare costs, and less information for people to make decisions about their own health. It’s a recipe for disaster.”

Analysts: “Not proud” of RFK Jr.

“We are not proud to have RFK Jr. at HHS. He is steering this country into dangerous territory based on his own whims and invalidated beliefs,” Schimmer and Schmidt contended. “While some had hoped he would stay focused on food and fitness, he’s ventured far outside of his swim lane. It’s time to take him out of the pool.”

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,838
19,879
113
Thanks MAGA

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113


HOLEE COW! Did you see what President Trump posted?

He posted a video of a renowned geneticist and the Director of genetics at Maryland Medical Library about how POISONOUS many Vaccines with Thimerosal is

This comes JUST before RDK Jr is set to release his autism report. HE KNOWS WHATS COMING!

The FALLOUT IS GOING TO CREATE SHOCKWAVES!
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
26,838
19,879
113
What about Amish kids dpic?
What about Iron Lung kids T-goober?


The Amish are an insular society and have a lower chance of running into people like you.

Lower vaccination coverage leaves Amish children vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). In recent decades, Amish communities have experienced outbreaks of measles, pertussis, and polio. During outbreaks:
  • In one study, children from the Plain community were hospitalized for VPDs at more than twice the rate of non-Plain children.
  • Public health interventions can be effective, particularly with the support of trusted community leaders.

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113
Peer reviewed studies people.



🚨BREAKING: Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study Found Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders — 57% Were Chronically Ill After 10 Years


Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. Vaccinated kids had:


496% more autoimmune disease
453% more neurodevelopmental disorders
329% more asthma
203% more atopic disease


After 10 years: 57% of vaccinated vs 17% of unvaccinated had chronic illness.


Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, or tics.


The most important vaccine safety study ever suppressed:


"Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study"


@ICANdecide @HighWireTalk @AaronSiriSG @SenRonJohnson @P_McCulloughMD @delbigtree
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113


🚨Aaron Siri just EXPOSED the TRUTH about vaccine injuries live in front of the Senate.

The first major vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study was finished in 2020.

And the results were so SHOCKING that it was never released.

“Vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.”

“There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group but zero in the unvaccinated group … including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and tics.”

“Overall, the study found that after 10 years, 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple.”
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113


First study on 18,000 vaccinated versus unvaccinated children- still think it's a "conspiracy theory?"

Compared to unvaccinated kids, vaccinated kids had:

6X more autoimmune disease

6X more neurodevelopmental disorders

4X more asthma

4X more speech disorders

3.5X more mental health issues

3.7X more developmental delays
 
Last edited:

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113


The Gov't Buried Evidence Proving Autism Is Caused By Poisoning...It Is Not Genetic.


5 Non-Verbal Autistic Boys Regained Language, Eye Contact & Playfulness Within Hours.


One Child Who Had NEVER Spoken Said His 1st Full Sentence.


If The Gov't Cannot Profit, Evidence Is Buried.



Have you heard of an anti-parasitic drug that brought back language, eye contact & play in non-verbal autistic kids within hours — & then got buried?


And what I’m about to share… might flip everything you thought you knew about autism.


It’s called Suramin — a 100-year-old drug originally derived from white pine needles. Today it can be purchased in health food stores as a dried product to steep in boiling water & make into white pine needle tea.


It’s so effective that the World Health Organization gives it out for free to treat sleeping sickness in Africa.


But here in the U.S.?


It’s not FDA-approved.


And it's almost impossible to get the pharmaceutical drug. But, easy to get natural white pine needles from reputable health food & natural stores.


And here’s where it gets interesting.


In 2017, Dr. Robert Naviaux gave a single low dose of Suramin to five non-verbal boys with autism.


And within hours to days…


Eye contact returned.


Language improved.


Playfulness, awareness & social connection came back.


One child even spoke his first full sentence.


But Suramin has one big problem: it can’t be patented. No one can own it. And if no one can profit, no one funds it.
So the study got no funding.


Dr. Naviaux went $500,000 into debt just to run it.


And despite the jaw-dropping results, the data was essentially buried.


This just goes to show how corrupt our system is — & how they don’t care about truth, healing, or our kids… just money.


👇Dr Naviaux: Suramin For Autism Trial👇
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC54…
👇White Pine Needle Suramin👇
sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmac…
👇Suramin For Autism Spectrum Disorder👇
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…
Video: @roystonebelize
Speaker: @denny_dure
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knickslions69

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
41,567
31,184
113


An 11-week-old baby girl got 20 vaccines in one visit. 6 hours later, she was dead.

For 12 years, DOJ & HHS fought to deny her parents justice.

A court has finally ruled: the vaccines killed her.

This ruling could set a precedent for thousands of families denied justice.

More than ten years of litigation to acknowledge what is clear and undeniable is an injustice to every grieving family.

Watch the full episode of ‘This Week with Mary & Polly’ on #CHDTV👇
live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/g…
 

housess1

Heisman
Dec 24, 2008
10,369
15,043
113
I have explained repeatedly why the diagnosis of autism is in the rise. Anti-vaxxers don't want to hear facts that don't fit the narrative. They don't want to hear from experts who have literally worked with autistic children for decades.

There has never been a single study that hasn't been refuted as false, that has shown any connection between autism and vaccines. Not a single one.
That is true. However, can you name a study that absolutely shows no connection. There is no funding for studies that don't have an economic impact (drug approvals are the majority).

The meta data collected on Covid vaccines is now being examined. While that isn't a controlled study, the vast quantity of data allows for statistically significant conclusions to be drawn.

My wife has ALS and will die from it within a year (probably less). There is a test for nerve deterioration byproducts. There are basically no studies to speak of for this test (ALS lacks any definitive test for diagnosis). The most information I could find was a 97 point scatter diagram of test results for people diagnosed with the disease. There was a second test with a smaller group that had both diagnosed and suspected of having ALS. That had even less data points. NO ONE WILL FINANCE STUDIES! My wife had the test once and actually had a low value. She won't get another test because there is no value. Multiple tests on my wife and others who have been diagnosed would determine if this test was a valuable tool for identification of the disease and a means to measure progression.

I am not an anti-vaxer. However, Covid vaccines are showing detrimental side effects. The value of any given vaccine needs to be weighed against the side effects.
 

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,526
21,291
113
That is true. However, can you name a study that absolutely shows no connection. There is no funding for studies that don't have an economic impact (drug approvals are the majority).

The meta data collected on Covid vaccines is now being examined. While that isn't a controlled study, the vast quantity of data allows for statistically significant conclusions to be drawn.

My wife has ALS and will die from it within a year (probably less). There is a test for nerve deterioration byproducts. There are basically no studies to speak of for this test (ALS lacks any definitive test for diagnosis). The most information I could find was a 97 point scatter diagram of test results for people diagnosed with the disease. There was a second test with a smaller group that had both diagnosed and suspected of having ALS. That had even less data points. NO ONE WILL FINANCE STUDIES! My wife had the test once and actually had a low value. She won't get another test because there is no value. Multiple tests on my wife and others who have been diagnosed would determine if this test was a valuable tool for identification of the disease and a means to measure progression.

I am not an anti-vaxer. However, Covid vaccines are showing detrimental side effects. The value of any given vaccine needs to be weighed against the side effects.

I'm truly sorry for your wife and for you, that's terrible. I'll be praying for you.

I would assume you are not happy that the government has cut funding for research at Colleges and Universities?
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
1,758
2,660
113
That is true. However, can you name a study that absolutely shows no connection. There is no funding for studies that don't have an economic impact (drug approvals are the majority).

The meta data collected on Covid vaccines is now being examined. While that isn't a controlled study, the vast quantity of data allows for statistically significant conclusions to be drawn.

My wife has ALS and will die from it within a year (probably less). There is a test for nerve deterioration byproducts. There are basically no studies to speak of for this test (ALS lacks any definitive test for diagnosis). The most information I could find was a 97 point scatter diagram of test results for people diagnosed with the disease. There was a second test with a smaller group that had both diagnosed and suspected of having ALS. That had even less data points. NO ONE WILL FINANCE STUDIES! My wife had the test once and actually had a low value. She won't get another test because there is no value. Multiple tests on my wife and others who have been diagnosed would determine if this test was a valuable tool for identification of the disease and a means to measure progression.

I am not an anti-vaxer. However, Covid vaccines are showing detrimental side effects. The value of any given vaccine needs to be weighed against the side effects.
Very sorry to hear about your personal situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,526
21,291
113
That is true. However, can you name a study that absolutely shows no connection. There is no funding for studies that don't have an economic impact (drug approvals are the majority).

The meta data collected on Covid vaccines is now being examined. While that isn't a controlled study, the vast quantity of data allows for statistically significant conclusions to be drawn.

My wife has ALS and will die from it within a year (probably less). There is a test for nerve deterioration byproducts. There are basically no studies to speak of for this test (ALS lacks any definitive test for diagnosis). The most information I could find was a 97 point scatter diagram of test results for people diagnosed with the disease. There was a second test with a smaller group that had both diagnosed and suspected of having ALS. That had even less data points. NO ONE WILL FINANCE STUDIES! My wife had the test once and actually had a low value. She won't get another test because there is no value. Multiple tests on my wife and others who have been diagnosed would determine if this test was a valuable tool for identification of the disease and a means to measure progression.

I am not an anti-vaxer. However, Covid vaccines are showing detrimental side effects. The value of any given vaccine needs to be weighed against the side effects.

And that's why government research grants are so valuable. We as a country can invest in research without worrying if there is a profit. Only the government can do major research such as this.