Thoughts?
The only question should be does it safely work or not.
I believe that's true, but it will be years before a complete determination can be made.The only question should be does it safely work or not.
Often have issues seeing tweets at work, is there a link you could share?
A theory.
Im talking about your claim that there was a huge study done showing there was no connection, and then you have this guy claiming there are 27 studies that show a causal relationship. Is he making things up? Is he misconstruing the studies? Who am i to believe?Was at the PT, then a late work call, I don’t know either lol
There was just a 2mm people study done on this and once normalized for genetics and environment, there was no connection. So was curious when a new study was done. Conducted by who, etc.
An association and causation are not the same thing. This has been extensively studied as people absolutely want to find answers. Kenvue might be the least lobbying heavy pharma company in the world as well.Im talking about your claim that there was a huge study done showing there was no connection, and then you have this guy claiming there are 27 studies that show a causal relationship. Is he making things up? Is he misconstruing the studies? Who am i to believe?
“This research is NOT a split decision as you described. TWENTY-SEVEN studies found an association between prenatal use of acetaminophen and autism. There were thirteen studies that went the other way, but the authors concluded that higher quality studies FAVORED an association.
governments seem to really enjoy the victory laps long before the battle is over. Unfortunately there's never a follow up to really analyze if the lap was warranted.An association and causation are not the same thing. This has been extensively studied as people absolutely want to find answers. Kenvue might be the least lobbying heavy pharma company in the world as well.
Your quote of what I said was incorrect, I said "once normalized for genetics and environment", there was no connection. Meaning there have been a lot of studies that showed association, that once studied further, did not show causation.
Study from last year: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2817406
People want to know the answer. It is being studied. But doing victory laps before any actual conclusions, particularly one that has the potential to cause damage (fever absolutely can cause much worse things than autism) is reckless.
And honestly, this will be my last post on the topic.
governments seem to really enjoy the victory laps long before the battle is over. Unfortunately there's never a follow up to really analyze if the lap was warranted.
An association and causation are not the same thing. This has been extensively studied as people absolutely want to find answers. Kenvue might be the least lobbying heavy pharma company in the world as well.
Your quote of what I said was incorrect, I said "once normalized for genetics and environment", there was no connection. Meaning there have been a lot of studies that showed association, that once studied further, did not show causation.
Study from last year: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2817406
People want to know the answer. It is being studied. But doing victory laps before any actual conclusions, particularly one that has the potential to cause damage (fever absolutely can cause much worse things than autism) is reckless.
And honestly, this will be my last post on the topic.
![]()
History of Autism: When Was Autism First Diagnosed? | Otsimo
This article explains the history of autism and how the evolution occurred, characterizing autism from a psychiatric disorder to a developmental disorder.otsimo.com
from what you posted, you know more about this than I do. But, I have to admit, if I'm pregnant (now that I know men can be) I find another another pain reliever. Although, based on today's political environment, some women will take Tylenol just to spite trumpAnd it honestly feels like this is an attempt to placate the people who are convinced that something is "causing" autism, even though they have zero proof or new studies which show that at all.
Honestly the best part of the press conference was the laughingly bad attempt at pronouncing Acetaminophen by our President. I instantly understood why they blamed Tylenol and not acetaminophen. I do wonder if Tylenol is going to sue based on the use of their brand name.
from what you posted, you know more about this than I do. But, I have to admit, if I'm pregnant (now that I know men can be) I find another another pain reliever. Although, based on today's political environment, some women will take Tylenol just to spite trump
Explain the Amish yoshi.And it honestly feels like this is an attempt to placate the people who are convinced that something is "causing" autism, even though they have zero proof or new studies which show that at all.
Honestly the best part of the press conference was the laughingly bad attempt at pronouncing Acetaminophen by our President. I instantly understood why they blamed Tylenol and not acetaminophen. I do wonder if Tylenol is going to sue based on the use of their brand name.
"The Amish, a religious and cultural group primarily in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana, have been the subject of myths claiming they experience little to no autism—often tied to their lower vaccination rates or "simpler" lifestyle. However, scientific evidence shows autism does occur in Amish communities, with prevalence rates that are comparable to or slightly lower than the general population. Apparent differences are largely attributed to underdiagnosis, not absence."Explain the Amish yoshi.
This under diagnosis coping mechanism used by libs and the vax groupies is sad and dangerous for the long term health of our population."The Amish, a religious and cultural group primarily in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana, have been the subject of myths claiming they experience little to no autism—often tied to their lower vaccination rates or "simpler" lifestyle. However, scientific evidence shows autism does occur in Amish communities, with prevalence rates that are comparable to or slightly lower than the general population. Apparent differences are largely attributed to underdiagnosis, not absence."
"Key Scientific Studies Limited but rigorous research has examined ASD in Amish populations, focusing on screening and diagnosis challenges like cultural norms (e.g., reluctance to seek external medical care) and genetic founder effects (the Amish descend from a small group of European settlers, leading to higher rates of certain genetic conditions)."
Debunking the Myth The "no autism in Amish" claim originated from anecdotal reports and anti-vaccine advocates (e.g., a 2005 UPI article citing unverified low rates of 1 in 15,000, later discredited). Fact-checkers like FactCheck.org, AP News, and Snopes label it false:
- Diagnosis Challenges: Amish families often prioritize community-based care and may view behavioral differences as "quirky" traits rather than seeking formal diagnosis. Limited health insurance and rural isolation contribute to underreporting. A 2009 case study also identified a genetic mutation (CNTNAP2) linked to autism and seizures in Amish children, confirming hereditary factors.
- Vaccination Context: While Amish vaccination rates are lower (~14–32% fully unvaccinated per 2011–2017 surveys), 68–85% receive at least some vaccines. Over 20 large-scale studies (e.g., Danish cohort of 657,000 children) show no link between vaccines (including MMR) and autism—rates are identical in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups.
In summary, the Amish do not experience a dramatically different percentage of autism from the rest of the U.S.—rates are similar when accounting for underdiagnosis. This myth harms public health by fueling vaccine hesitancy, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. For support, Amish families increasingly access specialized clinics, improving outcomes.
- Autism exists but is underdiagnosed; experts like Braxton Mitchell (Amish Research Clinic) confirm cases via clinics serving Amish families.
- Lower observed rates (~1/3 of national) stem from diagnostic barriers, not biology or vaccines. Genetic studies show no protective "Amish gene" against ASD; instead, their founder population increases risks for some neurodevelopmental disorders.
- Broader factors (e.g., lower exposure to pollutants or screens) may mildly influence severity, but not eliminate ASD.
You have a bloated orange turnip with zero expertise in public health bellowing on national tv about not taking a drug he can't even pronounce, while recommending taking a drug conveniently sold by his Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, with no new studies that prove any of this.This under diagnosis coping mechanism used by libs and the vax groupies is sad and dangerous for the long term health of our population.
This under diagnosis coping mechanism used by libs and the vax groupies is sad and dangerous for the long term health of our population.
Yoshi,Show me a single study that shows a link. What is dangerous is idiotic buffoons like our President and apparently you spreading misinformation such a Tylenol causes Autism.
It's the most MAGA thing ever to try and blame women for autism.
I really wonder if Tylenol is going to sue the administration for slander.
Yoshi,
Trust the experts running the show and be grateful for more knowledge. Being anti science is unbecoming bro.
Yoshi come in out of the woods. Science is our friend.You support an idiot who can't pronounce Acetaminophen.
I feel good with the experts I follow.
Yoshi come in out of the woods. Science is our friend.
This graph is meaningless. It has no sourcing, no references. I can make that graph in excel in 2 minutes. Sometimes it's hard to tell when people are being serious and when they are not. You seem to take it very seriously, which i appreciate, and then you post something like that which any person with an average IQ knows is meaningless. Without sourcing and telling where the data comes from it is like a child's fingerpainting.View attachment 926783
Explain this then.
I need you to calm down. That was clearly a joke and I am aware that RFK Jr's years on earth haven't caused autism. Goodness man. I do take it seriously, but I thought that this graph was clear enough haThis graph is meaningless. It has no sourcing, no references. I can make that graph in excel in 2 minutes. Sometimes it's hard to tell when people are being serious and when they are not. You seem to take it very seriously, which i appreciate, and then you post something like that which any person with an average IQ knows is meaningless. Without sourcing and telling where the data comes from it is like a child's fingerpainting.
If it was a joke, i missed it. I apologize.I need you to calm down. That was clearly a joke and I am aware that RFK Jr's years on earth haven't caused autism. Goodness man. I do take it seriously, but I thought that this graph was clear enough ha
No worries. I wouldn't have dropped something serious like that without at least an article or something (if something more legit were on the axis that his years on earth).If it was a joke, i missed it. I apologize.
Just listen to RFK and his team. They will have you back on the right track in no time.So share the science...
That's right, no science supports this idiocy.
Lol!!!So share the science...
That's right, no science supports this idiocy.
Lol!!!