I honestly never heard that. Ever.
Kamala Harris can’t wage war on wildfires in her home state, much less complicated geo-political regime change.
Time to unburden Venezuela from what has been.
I honestly never heard that. Ever.
Kamala Harris can’t wage war on wildfires in her home state, much less complicated geo-political regime change.
Time to unburden Venezuela from what has been.
He was not legitimately elected, agreed.You're right on the court battle, but I cant get worked up over it. Maduro was not the legitimate President, and he has been removed. I welcome lengthy hearings on the legality of removing him this way, and the extent of Executive power in this regard. Doubt we get much clarity, though.
Again, if Obama's NATO intervention in Libya was a "war" (it was consistently labeled that way and was a huge rallying cry from Republicans against him that he got us involved in another war), then this Venezuela entanglement is a war.How many casualties did we suffer with the Iran strike and now the Maduro raid? These aren't wars and we lost zero Americans.
But my point was, the US cannot just accuse someone of being a terrorist and then go grab them from a foreign country.
Nah, it was never the same after Walter Payton died.Regime meddling in Columbia improved things to an extent.
TLDR all of it....but he's screwed.Indictment is linked below. Good stuff starts at the bottom of page 10.
![]()
Read the Indictment Against Nicolás Maduro
The Venezuelan president was accused of narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine, among other charges. His wife, Cilia Flores, was also charged.www.nytimes.com
Congress, lol. The only thing Congress is good for is voting themselves a raise. And yes, the end does justify the means.
You see, this is the excuse republicans use to not do anything, then when the tables turn the demonrats have no problem justifying their means to an end. Use it while you got it, baby!
I voted for this!!! Don’t FAFO with him. Sorry that strength offends you lib Pu55ies
Strength for what??? Men in women’s sports?? A liberal president will let the world burn down as long as rainbows can continue to fly
Why are liberals always for the bad guys?
BS
Yep when you’re the baddest MF on the block you apply the rules as you see fit.
Trump admin will argue that Maduro wasn't legitimately elected and doesn't have the same immunities that a legitimate leader of a UN nation does. Similar to Noriega as you said. Might work, might not. Noriega was an unelected military dictator that served alongside various Presidents - so our courts deferred to the executive's claim he wasn't a head of state there. They bought the claim he wasn't a legit head of state entitled to immunities. Probably a little less clear with Maduro since he's clearly been the shot caller there for the last decade+ with other countries also recognizing his legitimacy. He got there in a corrupt way but there's no question that he's the acting leader so it presents something unsettled in the international law context.Legit concern. He was basically arrested in a foreign country to answer for a criminal indictment in the US, which we dont typically have legal authority to do. But, its pretty much what we did to Manuel Noriega, who was captured, tried, and convicted in the US.
I imagine Maduro's first defense will be that his arrest was illegal, and we'll see how that goes.
Not just oil, but more to get Iran, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Cuban influence out of their country. Now that Venezuela is off the board......Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico......"You're on the Clock".Hey guys got this figured out
It’s oil I think
So it’s a police action then?How many casualties did we suffer with the Iran strike and now the Maduro raid? These aren't wars and we lost zero Americans.
Panama....next.Not just oil, but more to get Iran, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Cuban influence out of their country. Now that Venezuela is off the board......Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico......"You're on the Clock".
Gawd ur a moronAgain, if Obama's NATO intervention in Libya was a "war" (it was consistently labeled that way and was a huge rallying cry from Republicans against him that he got us involved in another war), then this Venezuela entanglement is a war.
To even mention AOC as president shows you are as dense as you sound. Is that the best of the best from the left?Whatever power Trump takes, the next president will have it too. And there will be someone from the other side at some point. Everybody okay with President AOC having the same amount of power? If you are cheering for the way he is going about getting stuff done, then you better be
14 months ago, it was "Don't vote for warmongering Kamala Harris who will get us in a war with Russia or Venezuela."
14 months ago, it was "Don't vote for warmongering Kamala Harris who will get us in a war with Russia or Venezuela."
Gosh must have missed US tanks rolling through the streets of Caracas.14 months ago, it was "Don't vote for warmongering Kamala Harris who will get us in a war with Russia or Venezuela."
Since there are now many different justifications claimed, stay with me, please.Not just oil, but more to get Iran, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Cuban influence out of their country. Now that Venezuela is off the board......Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico......"You're on the Clock".
I am pretty sure AOC was referenced because she is so divisive and is a boogeyman for the right.To even mention AOC as president shows you are as dense as you sound. Is that the best of the best from the left?
Regime meddling in Columbia improved things to an extent.
Damn sure were helicopters. That’s amazing by the way, military speaking.Gosh must have missed US tanks rolling through the streets of Caracas.
So what comes next? That is a deadly serious question. It’s much more important than snatching Maduro.At least Trump took action, something Biden was too stupid to do.
Great question. Whatever is next - it's the hard part. If we can facilitate a transition to legitimate democratic platform that the Venezuelan people have been wanting, then that's a win. I suspect that we will take whatever path will be of the least resistance to a privatized oil industry whether it's what the people want or not. Time will tell.So what comes next? That is a deadly serious question. It’s much more important than snatching Maduro.
Realistically speaking.... 20 years and $2T.So what comes next? That is a deadly serious question. It’s much more important than snatching Maduro.
The only reason I have to hope this situation turns out ok is that the Venezuelan people have some idea of what democracy looks like and they're surrounded by some stable(ish) neighbors. I think there is a chance they'll stand up for what they want.Great question. Whatever is next - it's the hard part. If we can facilitate a transition to legitimate democratic platform that the Venezuelan people have been wanting, then that's a win. I suspect that we will take whatever path will be of the least resistance to a privatized oil industry whether it's what the people want or not. Time will tell.
Agree. I guess we could find out quickly if there's a push for Gonzalez and his party to take over if the sentiment from 2024 is still there - which I assume it is. If we push for something else, then the end game will sound more profit based than watering seeds of democracy and political stability. I hope there's a democratic win for their people, but if that gets in the way of Trump's vision for the oil industry there, the Venezuelan people will be taking a back seat.The only reason I have to hope this situation turns out ok is that the Venezuelan people have some idea of what democracy looks like and they're surrounded by some stable(ish) neighbors. I think there is a chance they'll stand up for what they want.
The problem in Afghanistan was/is/always will be.. those people have no concept of freedom, democracy and finding commonality among others within their nation. They are savages with cell phones. And if that pissesoff some folks.. tough. I've read too much over the last 25 years about that part of the world. There is no fixing it.
But maybe Venezuela is different.
Okay, they can do it, but its not legal to do it just because you label them a terrorist.
You must be retardedIt’s nuanced. If you are a white male MAGA, I’m this country your rights are pretty secure as long as you stay that way and toe the party line. Very small line between authoritarian and oppressive. I don’t make much distinction for our FOTUS.
Sigh. You pick the candidate from the left then. And give me an actual answer to the question that doesn’t involve name calling. It’s a serious questionTo even mention AOC as president shows you are as dense as you sound. Is that the best of the best from the left?
Okay, they can do it, but its not legal to do it just because you label them a terrorist.
**** em, watch it burn.So what comes next? That is a deadly serious question. It’s much more important than snatching Maduro.