Venezuela is ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,935
5,787
113
You're right on the court battle, but I cant get worked up over it. Maduro was not the legitimate President, and he has been removed. I welcome lengthy hearings on the legality of removing him this way, and the extent of Executive power in this regard. Doubt we get much clarity, though.
He was not legitimately elected, agreed.
As mentioned up thread, my concern is that the decision to remove a leader due to them being viewed as illegitimate, is inconsistently/arbitrarily applied.

There are others in power due to shenanigans and not supporting democracy...and it's crickets. Heck, there has been actual praise for some of them.
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,868
2,513
113
How many casualties did we suffer with the Iran strike and now the Maduro raid? These aren't wars and we lost zero Americans.
Again, if Obama's NATO intervention in Libya was a "war" (it was consistently labeled that way and was a huge rallying cry from Republicans against him that he got us involved in another war), then this Venezuela entanglement is a war.
 

HotMop

All-American
May 8, 2006
7,736
6,033
113
But my point was, the US cannot just accuse someone of being a terrorist and then go grab them from a foreign country.
Donald Trump GIF by reactionseditor
 

Dawgg

Heisman
Sep 9, 2012
10,535
10,793
113
Congress, lol. The only thing Congress is good for is voting themselves a raise. And yes, the end does justify the means.

You see, this is the excuse republicans use to not do anything, then when the tables turn the demonrats have no problem justifying their means to an end. Use it while you got it, baby!

I voted for this!!! Don’t FAFO with him. Sorry that strength offends you lib Pu55ies

Strength for what??? Men in women’s sports?? A liberal president will let the world burn down as long as rainbows can continue to fly

Why are liberals always for the bad guys?

BS

Yep when you’re the baddest MF on the block you apply the rules as you see fit.


You guys are fuсking morons.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,985
5,797
113
Legit concern. He was basically arrested in a foreign country to answer for a criminal indictment in the US, which we dont typically have legal authority to do. But, its pretty much what we did to Manuel Noriega, who was captured, tried, and convicted in the US.

I imagine Maduro's first defense will be that his arrest was illegal, and we'll see how that goes.
Trump admin will argue that Maduro wasn't legitimately elected and doesn't have the same immunities that a legitimate leader of a UN nation does. Similar to Noriega as you said. Might work, might not. Noriega was an unelected military dictator that served alongside various Presidents - so our courts deferred to the executive's claim he wasn't a head of state there. They bought the claim he wasn't a legit head of state entitled to immunities. Probably a little less clear with Maduro since he's clearly been the shot caller there for the last decade+ with other countries also recognizing his legitimacy. He got there in a corrupt way but there's no question that he's the acting leader so it presents something unsettled in the international law context.

That's not me defending Maduro the person/leader. He can rot. Just bringing up unsettled and murky issues in international law that will make this interesting to follow. If Country A can decide Country B has an illegitimate leader and invade and remove them from power under international law, that's frightening. Equally frightening that someone might be able obtain power by corruption or force and get an immunity protection under the same framework.
 

leeinator

All-Conference
Feb 24, 2014
2,130
1,575
113
Hey guys got this figured out
It’s oil I think
Not just oil, but more to get Iran, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Cuban influence out of their country. Now that Venezuela is off the board......Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico......"You're on the Clock".
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloryDawg

BTCMoonBoy

Sophomore
Dec 4, 2024
191
159
43
Again, if Obama's NATO intervention in Libya was a "war" (it was consistently labeled that way and was a huge rallying cry from Republicans against him that he got us involved in another war), then this Venezuela entanglement is a war.
Gawd ur a moron
 

H8arebel

Redshirt
Feb 12, 2023
15
14
3
Whatever power Trump takes, the next president will have it too. And there will be someone from the other side at some point. Everybody okay with President AOC having the same amount of power? If you are cheering for the way he is going about getting stuff done, then you better be
To even mention AOC as president shows you are as dense as you sound. Is that the best of the best from the left?
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,935
5,787
113
Not just oil, but more to get Iran, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Cuban influence out of their country. Now that Venezuela is off the board......Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico......"You're on the Clock".
Since there are now many different justifications claimed, stay with me, please.

So you are saying the US is justified in invading a sovereign country and kidnapping it's leader because that will stop 5 other countries we don't like from influencing that country?

That is insane.
You need to drop this justification and support one of the other justifications.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgsmith15

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,935
5,787
113
To even mention AOC as president shows you are as dense as you sound. Is that the best of the best from the left?
I am pretty sure AOC was referenced because she is so divisive and is a boogeyman for the right.
It was an extreme example to help highlight the concern of giving the same power to the other side.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,985
5,797
113
So what comes next? That is a deadly serious question. It’s much more important than snatching Maduro.
Great question. Whatever is next - it's the hard part. If we can facilitate a transition to legitimate democratic platform that the Venezuelan people have been wanting, then that's a win. I suspect that we will take whatever path will be of the least resistance to a privatized oil industry whether it's what the people want or not. Time will tell.
 

Xenomorph

All-American
Feb 15, 2007
15,319
8,984
113
Great question. Whatever is next - it's the hard part. If we can facilitate a transition to legitimate democratic platform that the Venezuelan people have been wanting, then that's a win. I suspect that we will take whatever path will be of the least resistance to a privatized oil industry whether it's what the people want or not. Time will tell.
The only reason I have to hope this situation turns out ok is that the Venezuelan people have some idea of what democracy looks like and they're surrounded by some stable(ish) neighbors. I think there is a chance they'll stand up for what they want.

The problem in Afghanistan was/is/always will be.. those people have no concept of freedom, democracy and finding commonality among others within their nation. They are savages with cell phones. And if that pissesoff some folks.. tough. I've read too much over the last 25 years about that part of the world. There is no fixing it.

But maybe Venezuela is different.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
9,985
5,797
113
The only reason I have to hope this situation turns out ok is that the Venezuelan people have some idea of what democracy looks like and they're surrounded by some stable(ish) neighbors. I think there is a chance they'll stand up for what they want.

The problem in Afghanistan was/is/always will be.. those people have no concept of freedom, democracy and finding commonality among others within their nation. They are savages with cell phones. And if that pissesoff some folks.. tough. I've read too much over the last 25 years about that part of the world. There is no fixing it.

But maybe Venezuela is different.
Agree. I guess we could find out quickly if there's a push for Gonzalez and his party to take over if the sentiment from 2024 is still there - which I assume it is. If we push for something else, then the end game will sound more profit based than watering seeds of democracy and political stability. I hope there's a democratic win for their people, but if that gets in the way of Trump's vision for the oil industry there, the Venezuelan people will be taking a back seat.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,252
7,109
113
I started this thread and never commented on what I actually thought about this action. Well here I go…..There is absolutely NO doubt Maduro needed to go. The oil argument people are trying to make against it is bogus, we don’t need their oil for now. The sentiment was good, the method was over the top. The tanker blockade would have achieved the same end eventually. That being said the precedent for this is out there, Panama. All in all given what is going on elsewhere in the world, Formosa and Ukraine..I think this was a strategic and tactical misstep. Eliminating that context you can make an argument this was a good move. To begin with I thought this was incredibly stupid. After thinking on it I think the negatives outweigh the positives overall. That may not sound like a huge difference, but it really is. Time will tell, unfortunately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.