West Charlotte

btango

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2003
120,102
4,779
0
Players playing that lived outside their school district.
That is not entirely correct. I do not remember the exact particulars but there were some complexities involving a move from out of state, a grandmother and their subsequent move out of the district, the student filing for emancipation. The student was allowed to play basketball at another school where the grandmother had moved.
Most felt the student was in the right on legal grounds but to win you have to hire an attorney.
 

84k

All-Conference
Aug 24, 2009
1,516
1,140
0
The player did not play in every game so why should they forfeit more games?
I Maybe wrong, But I believe if you’re dressed out and on the side line that makes you ineligible.
Then you have to forfeit the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

crestcharger02

All-Conference
Nov 4, 2011
3,664
1,406
77
The player did not play in every game so why should they forfeit more games?
Wonder poster followed up with correct response. Doesn't matter if star player or a substitute that played snaps late in a 42-7 win over South Caldwell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

btango

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2003
120,102
4,779
0
Wonder poster followed up with correct response. Doesn't matter if star player or a substitute that played snaps late in a 42-7 win over South Caldwell.

I Maybe wrong, But I believe if you’re dressed out and on the side line that makes you ineligible.
Then you have to forfeit the game.
You are correct, if a player dresses he is a participant. I should have written dressed instead of played.

CORRECTION. 1994 is the correct season. My bad.

All games that he dressed for the game was forfeited. I remember the case and that many felt the student should be allow to participate in athletics but was ruled against. Not sure but I think he was injured which is when the questions came up. Do not think it was as much residency as it was legal guardianship, who lived where, et al.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

crestcharger02

All-Conference
Nov 4, 2011
3,664
1,406
77
You are correct, if a player dresses he is a participant. I should have written dressed instead of played.

It was 1993 and not 1994.

All games that he dressed for the game was forfeited. I remember the case and that many felt the student should be allow to participate in athletics but was ruled against. Not sure but I think he was injured which is when the questions came up. Do not think it was as much residency as it was legal guardianship, who lived where, et al.
I actually picked 1993 because of how they ended Crest's season. Wasn't aware they had issues back then as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

Stalk and Go

Freshman
Sep 3, 2021
81
75
0
So West Charlotte returns pretty much the whole team and now has the best running back in North Carolina if that ain't Charlotte football for you...
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

btango

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2003
120,102
4,779
0
I actually picked 1993 because of how they ended Crest's season. Wasn't aware they had issues back then as well.
Correction. I meant to write it was 1994 not 1993. 1994 season was one of Knotts worst at WC. Lost to Ashbrook. They had a good team in 1993 but were absolutely rolled in the second half by a really good Northern Durham team on a very cold and windy day at Kenan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC91

shutdownD24

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2014
2,770
4,143
0
WC returning their complete O-line and adding Smothers to that mix along with their other returning starters definitely makes them a legitimate state championship threat this upcoming season. The addition of Smothers will make his new WC teammates raise their level of dedication and discipline to getting better. WC football now has my attention!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crestufff and UNC91