Let’s clear a few things up... because what you’re arguing blends half-truths, projections, and emotional framing into a misleading narrative.
1. “ICE will be the largest law enforcement agency.”
- No, it won’t. Even with increased funding, ICE will not surpass CBP (Customs and Border Protection) in personnel, scope, or enforcement power.
- CBP employs over 60,000 people
- CE currently employs around 20,000
Even with growth, ICE won’t suddenly eclipse agencies like the FBI, DEA, or CBP in size or function. Funding ≠ size. More money doesn’t change the core jurisdiction of the agency.
2. “$150 billion over 4 years proves it’s a police state.”
- The $150 billion isn’t just for ICE detention. It includes a wide range of immigration-related spending: enforcement, legal adjudication, border tech, personnel, detention infrastructure, and contracting costs.
- Yes, it’s a huge number. But that does not mean the government is building a police state... it means it’s making immigration enforcement a priority (right or wrong, that’s a policy choice, not authoritarianism).
3. “More than Israel, Italy, Brazil military budgets!”
- True... on paper. But the U.S. is a superpower with 330+ million people, a massive land border, and complex immigration systems. Comparing domestic enforcement funding to national military budgets in smaller countries is apples to oranges. Plus, CBP + ICE + DHS are still dwarfed by the U.S. military, which has an annual budget exceeding $850 billion.
4. Bottom Line
You can absolutely argue that this spending is excessive, morally wrong, or a poor use of funds compared to Medicare. But framing it as the "largest" police state ever" is inaccurate, hyperbolic, and undermines real concerns with fear-based rhetoric.
The reality is... yes... immigration enforcement is being supercharged. But ICE is not becoming the FBI, it's not eclipsing CBP, and it's not turning American into a police state (unless you truly have zero clue what a police state actually is). Exaggeration isn't truth... it's just noise.