you're making my point for me, you ask, I respond...but you don't like my answer so your response is "you didn't answer my question" and the loop continues.
You won't accept a response until or it's "you're right moogy, you've always been right, how could I have been so misguided". And just to be clear, that's not going to happen because I Disagree with you and no matter what or how you move it around with "answer my question"," its a yes or no answer". My answer will be the same and you will say "you didn't answer" etc etc etc, round and around and around.
Are you NJPSU by another moniker? Was was your past user name?
No, you didn’t answer my question.
It’s not that I don’t like your response, it’s that you didn’t respond to the question.
If I ask you “what does 2 plus 2 equal?, if you respond “I like the color blue.” that isn’t me not liking your response, that’s you not answering the question. Now, if you had answered “2+2=5”, that’s responding to my question, but it’s wrong and I won’t like that response.
Thank you for admitting that you're never going to be logical, and you're going to stick to your position, no matter how unsound and invalid the attempted logic is illustrated to be. It was known you were this limited, but it's nice for you to acknowledge it.
So, again, this was about the impropriety of saying you'd date your daughter. Reasonable people with a working moral compass would simply say "it's improper." You, on the other hand, in order to protect your fuhrer, have tried to not answer questions, sidestep questions, or dispute questions, rather than just answer the questions. "It's not banging." "I don't have a daughter", etc. In each instance, I've explained away your attempted diversion and restated the question in a manner that avoids your supposed disputed area, and you refuse to answer the amended question.
And, at each step, when it was clear that you wouldn't answer the question, I've posed a different question ... and you've avoided that one.
Currently, we're at the issue of the difference between "dating" someone and going out with friends. You will not address this. I know why you won't. You know why you won't. But the simple fact is, you won't. And now you're trying to run cover for that.
And, in the end, what we're left with is the fact that you have unfettered, immutable support for a guy who looks at his daughter in a sexual way, who has been found liable for sexual assault, who has admitted he's a sexual predator, who has bragged about sexual assault on underage girls, has bragged about sexual assault on women, has been deemed "too gross" for a sex trafficker of underage girls, after being his bestie for years, who has committed felonies in order to try to cover up his sexual deviancies for political advancement and who has tried to run cover for the epstein files. And that's just the stuff that is known and settled. What lies underneath is obviously much worse.
And you say "that's OK with me" or "I don't care."