And by the way, you say USC was trash with Orth. Let me remind you that they beat UNC before losing to us and losing Orth and UNC is 9-1 right now with their only loss to USC. So yes, they were a much different team with Orth and at that time they played well.
Funny you say that everyone on this board says I am one of the less intelligent ones here, yet you joined this past Sunday. You don't know what people say about me. And I really don't care what you or anyone else here thinks of my intelligence. Doesn't make you or them right.
Yes it does. You changed you stance. Big difference when you use history and then all of a sudden add another component to change your stance. Typically that happens when someone proves your first statement wrong.
When you defend you arguments that are 100% wrong. Then yes it makes all of us right. No one here likes to discuss football with you because you're the biggest unrealistic homer there is. I've been following these boards for awhile and definitely have noticed how no one values your opinion here. And I'm no longer going to pretend to myself. It's pointless. This years USC team = trash. Last years Florida team was a bowl team. So had we beaten Florida I could have called it a quality win. And at the same damn time. I can call this years USC win a non quality win. No having it both ways because you can't compre this years trash USC team to last years Florida team. No comparison. Not gonna pretend to care about what you say it makes me feel dumber reading the stuff. Bye
No, continuing to try to prove your point by repeating the same "example" makes you look ignorant. How many posts have you made about the USC Uf thing? I have explained that ten times now. You just can't comprehend things you read apparently.
YOU are the one who used history by saying its a quality win because they're historically better than us. I'm the one who said history doesn't matter when your evaluating a programs current team. I didn't bring history into the equation. You did! Jesus efdignchrist man give it up you're wrong.
Ok we got you on the UF USC thing. Get over it. And there are plenty of people who talk football with me. But even if they didn't, I really don't give a piss.
You are right. That is exactly how it went. Then I followed by asking you if beating a mediocre UF team would have been a quality win last year and you said yes, because they have beaten us 30 years in a row. That is using history to justify a quality win. So again, you just admitted to contradicting yourself.
I used that as part of the reason. But my main point was that they were 7-5 is why I stated they would have been a quality win. Again. In post number 63 you state that this years USC team is as good as last years Florida team. You did say that. Which is dumb as hell. And if you can't admit that. Then there's no hope.
And what was the first sentence in that post? I said, "we have awful losing streaks to many SEC teams." So the comment of they are as good, I am obviously referring to the quality of win due to the HISTORY, not the records of the team.
Lol I'm laughing my *** off over here. you said beating a UF team that's EQUIVALENT to this years mizzou and USC teams were your words. Then at the end of the post you said don't give me history. As in you weren't talking about history when comparing those teams. You need help man? Because in the post I put in bold. You even state that you're not referring to history in that post. You said that Florida team was equal to THIS YEARS USC and mizzou teams. Which has nothing to do with you reffwring to history?
You really can't comprehend things. I said you couldn't use history because that was your previous argument. As you already have proven, I was the first to say history is a part of it. And you said it wasn't, until I used the UF reference.
I really hate to get in this pissing match, but I most. I disagree with merrimanm more than I agree with him, but so much of what you are saying is stupid, the gin has convinced me to hop in. First of all, if Stoops makes 20 mistakes a game, and no one makes 5% of the mistakes he makes, that means everyone else is perfect. I really hate people that suck at math. While Missouri isn't a top 25 win, for Kentucky standards it is a good win. They have a good defense and played Georgia better than we did. More than math errors, I get frustrated by people that smart off for the sake of smarting off.
Read my last post where I underlined what he is claiming he never said. Obviously the kid is delusional. Why justify that?
Your words merriman. Are that USC this year is equivalent to Floridas team last year. The only point im getting at here is that that's not true. That's all I've been trying to prove. Because it's a fact. This years USC team is not as good as last years Florida team. Which you clearly stated they are equivalent in the post I have in bold.
First, I am not a kid. Secondly, most anyone who will read those posts will be able to comprehend that I used history as to why they are quality wins and you said that history was dumb to use. Then said that if we beat UF last year, then it would have been a quality win because they have beaten us 30 years in a row.
Equivalent in the HISTORY of them having long streaks against us, NOT the record. I have stated that many times. Yet that is all you can point to. When reading a paragraph supporting sentences are key to the main message. Just saying.
You said merriman. That LAST YEARS Florida team. Is equivalent to THIS YEARS USC team. Then stated how could one be a quality win then not the other since both teams are equal? I DID mention that Florida has had our number. That was PART of my reasoning. But my MAIN POINT is that last years Florida team Is way better than this years USC team. USC has never had our number near the same way as Florida which is true. But what else is also true. Is that you stated last years Florida team is equal to this years USC team. Which is why you claimed they would both be quality wins. Because both team are equal and you told me how could I call one a quality win and not the other if they're just as good. And my point was because Florida last year was way better than USC this year. Everyone reading these posts know you're wrong as far as this specific arguement goes once they read the message I put in bold. I'm done I'm done man bye. Please someone come here and point out this man is a talking hypocrite cuz I can't do it anymore.
CAN YOU READ!??? You said merriman. That beating a UF TEAM. Clearly meaning team and not programs history. That's equal to this years USC TEAM. Clearly meaning this years USC team not the program's history. Oh you were talking about the long losing streak that this years USC team put us thru? They beat us 10 times in a row this year forgot about that man that's why you mentioned the specific TEAM. And not the program's history? Ok merriman
can you truly agree that in that specific post that I put in bold he was clearly talking about the specific teams and not the program's history's? Then yes I can. But you do know that in that post I put in bold. He was clearly talking about last years Florida team and this years USC team right? Like he clearly states that. And not the program's history's right? Is the guy not off his wagon right now?
That is too you, only under an alt. Starting with jrizzle, this is the third go-round for you, then?
Jesus man absolutely not but if that's what you choose to believe go for it.
Again, I am pointing at that it is the same in the historical context. I clearly state that.
