Your 401K

Flie_rivals154594

All-Conference
Nov 2, 2001
1,271
2,123
113
It’s cherry picking to just use Biden’s last two years. He inherited a market that climbed from 2500 to 3800+ in the 3 quarters leading up to his inauguration. The market was then basically flat for two entire years. It was a horrible stretch of returns.

S&P is up from ~5800 to 7500 since Jan 2025, or about 29%.


YearReturn
2020+18.4%

PeriodS&P 500 Return
Biden (2023)+26.3% [us500.com]
Biden (2024)+25.0% [broadway.bank], [us500.com]
Biden last two full years combined~57.8% cumulative (1.263 × 1.250 − 1) [us500.com], [broadway.bank]
Trump 2nd term (Jan 20, 2025 to Aug 2026)~23.8% since taking office


Quite the improvement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,958
22,812
113
YearReturn
2020+18.4%

PeriodS&P 500 Return
Biden (2023)+26.3% [us500.com]
Biden (2024)+25.0% [broadway.bank], [us500.com]
Biden last two full years combined~57.8% cumulative (1.263 × 1.250 − 1) [us500.com], [broadway.bank]
Trump 2nd term (Jan 20, 2025 to Aug 2026)~23.8% since taking office


Quite the improvement.

Still cherry picking. You are ignoring his first 2 years, which were basically flat. And you can’t blame Trump for that. The market ripped back up in the 3 quarters leading up to Biden’s inauguration. In fact, Biden was in office for a full year prior to 2022, which saw the worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PedMaller

RagnarLothbrok

Heisman
Jun 11, 2025
5,934
15,872
113
As I was saying yesterday, if Oil resolves itself to $70-$75 a barrel or lower, this market is primed at the pump and will take off like a Starship rocket. Earnings are looking like they are coming in H.O.T.

@RagnarLothbrok err shortcok is not going to like this.


The World Is Wonderful: First Time Since 1955 | ZeroHedge

View attachment 1381545
I’m not gay and I will not date you.

Again, you’re a f#cking idiot who can’t read.

Stop wasting everyone’s time.
 

Flie_rivals154594

All-Conference
Nov 2, 2001
1,271
2,123
113
Still cherry picking. You are ignoring his first 2 years, which were basically flat. And you can’t blame Trump for that. The market ripped back up in the 3 quarters leading up to Biden’s inauguration. In fact, Biden was in office for a full year prior to 2022, which saw the worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis.

2022 was the peak of the pandemic recovery. Was it 2021 that saw the "worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis"?


Trump First Term (2017-2020)

YearS&P 500 Return
2017+21.8%
2018-4.4%
2019+31.5%
2020+18.4%


Biden Administration (2021-2024)


YearS&P 500 Return
2021+28.7%
2022-18.1%
2023+26.3%
2024+25.0%

Note the big improvement:

Trump Second Term (2025-Present)

YearS&P 500 Return
2025+17.9%
2026+10.1% YTD (through July 31, 2026)

 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,958
22,812
113
2022 was the peak of the pandemic recovery. Was it 2021 that saw the "worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis"?


Trump First Term (2017-2020)

YearS&P 500 Return
2017+21.8%
2018-4.4%
2019+31.5%
2020+18.4%


Biden Administration (2021-2024)


YearS&P 500 Return
2021+28.7%
2022-18.1%
2023+26.3%
2024+25.0%

Note the big improvement:

Trump Second Term (2025-Present)

YearS&P 500 Return
2025+17.9%
2026+10.1% YTD (through July 31, 2026)


I don’t understand your question.
 

Flie_rivals154594

All-Conference
Nov 2, 2001
1,271
2,123
113
I don’t understand your question.

" Biden was in office for a full year prior to 2022, which saw the worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis."

Maybe I misinterpreted this. I read it as you pointing out that Biden was in office a year prior to 2022, which (that year) saw the worst S&P returns yada yada.

Guessing you meant 2022 saw the worst returns. 2021 had great returns, along with 2023 and 2024.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,958
22,812
113
" Biden was in office for a full year prior to 2022, which saw the worst S&P returns since the 2008 financial crisis."

Maybe I misinterpreted this. I read it as you pointing out that Biden was in office a year prior to 2022, which (that year) saw the worst S&P returns yada yada.

Guessing you meant 2022 saw the worst returns. 2021 had great returns, along with 2023 and 2024.

Yep, correct. He was in seat for a full year prior to 2022. And then 2022 had the worst returns (-18%) since the 2008 financial crisis. That contributed to essentially a flat market for Biden's first 2 years, despite the market being on the upswing when he took office. We can't ignore that and just give him credit for his final 2 years like you and @dpic73 seem to be trying to do.
 

Flie_rivals154594

All-Conference
Nov 2, 2001
1,271
2,123
113
Yep, correct. He was in seat for a full year prior to 2022. And then 2022 had the worst returns (-18%) since the 2008 financial crisis. That contributed to essentially a flat market for Biden's first 2 years, despite the market being on the upswing when he took office. We can't ignore that and just give him credit for his final 2 years like you and @dpic73 seem to be trying to do.

Nobody ignores it. We just disagree on the reasons that it happened.

I believe that 2022 would have experienced similar results if Trump had been in office. MAGAs think otherwise.

MAGAs ignore the post 2022 recovery and also seem to ignore that things were better in 2024 than they are now. Shouldn't you all expect to see improvement from Biden's last two years through now? i.e. cheaper gas, lower inflation, cheaper groceries, better market growth etc.....

I mean sure, when your data points are limited to:

  • June 2022 (Biden - peak inflation rate, gas prices)
  • Today (Trump)

Hey look, things got better!!
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
33,417
29,192
113
It’s cherry picking to just use Biden’s last two years. He inherited a market that climbed from 2500 to 3800+ in the 3 quarters leading up to his inauguration. The market was then basically flat for two entire years. It was a horrible stretch of returns.

S&P is up from ~5800 to 7500 since Jan 2025, or about 29%.
Well sure it is and it was intentional. Can you guess why?
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,958
22,812
113
Nobody ignores it. We just disagree on the reasons that it happened.

I believe that 2022 would have experienced similar results if Trump had been in office. MAGAs think otherwise.

MAGAs ignore the post 2022 recovery and also seem to ignore that things were better in 2024 than they are now. Shouldn't you all expect to see improvement from Biden's last two years through now? i.e. cheaper gas, lower inflation, cheaper groceries, better market growth etc.....

I mean sure, when your data points are limited to:

  • June 2022 (Biden - peak inflation rate, gas prices)
  • Today (Trump)

Hey look, things got better!!

Well, I'm not MAGA. I disagree with Trump on a lot of things and think he's made unnecessary missteps that have hurt the economy. I also think that Biden injected unnecessary capital into the market in 2021 that helped fuel inflation, which contributed materially to the 2022 market decline. I believe both are bad presidents.
 

r_desihawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
2,658
3,832
112
This was one of the worst Julys for the market in a long time.

This market is primed at the pump for the 2nd half the year.



nobody with a brain would make that post without actually accomplishing something unless ulterior motives are at play and trump isn't dumb...
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
26,038
25,005
113
nobody with a brain would make that post without actually accomplishing something unless ulterior motives are at play and trump isn't dumb...
He knows he can end Iran easily. However, 1) it won't be popular with Iranians or Americans 2) It will tank the economy and markets.

Trump is kind of trapped and hence why he is "desperate" for a deal. There is no public appetite for the war in the US. A ground invasion or other bad press would tank the economy, and we all know how sensitive he is to the economy.

But we already know that Trump uses his Truth Social account as a bully pulpit. He definitely uses it for propaganda too.
 

PedMaller

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2021
1,833
1,921
113
Bless your heart. More successful..... lol.

Yep I'm just here on welfare just like the faux news told you.
Then why do you retards keep pushing for higher taxes (from those of us that already pay the most) to support ever expanding welfare programs for lazy grifters?

 

GesterHawk

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
20,485
39,811
113
I assume because what you said was funny.

For one "soaring" is not reality. You work for an investment firm and know the market is currently wobbly.

Second, since you work for an investment firm, you know 401ks are not portable, right?
Say dpic works for FedEx, he is not able to just "change investment firms" because the firm he is forced to use is dictated by FedEx, not him.

I am not sure why I am telling you things you clearly know, because, again, you work for an investment firm. And I believe you.
Stop yelling at the janitor.
 

PedMaller

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2021
1,833
1,921
113
401k Smashing through all time highs today. I would just like to thank President Trump for making these economic conditions possible.
SPY to all-time high of 768 & climbing!

So…..much…….winning!!!!! 🇺🇸 🏆

Donald J Trump Dance GIF
 

PedMaller

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2021
1,833
1,921
113
Dow at yet ANOTHER all-time high ending over 54k. Life is good for those of us who have worked hard & invested wisely.

Libtards make sure to include your daddy Trump in your prayers tonight for making this happen! 😂
 
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Linebacker
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated SUMMER UPDATE: T.J. Moore
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Tuesday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets: Sam Walker, Asher Ghioto
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated Clemson debuts at No. 23 in Coaches Poll
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated SUMMER UPDATE: Will Heldt