Skip to main content
56 Replies
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:32 AM

He’s not a quitter. You suggesting that says a lot. I will say this. We are on the road to wasting Caleb much like the football team wasted Drake Maye.
Avatar

TNTARHEEL

Jan 15, 4:33 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
He’s not a quitter. You suggesting that says a lot. I will say this. We are on the road to wasting Caleb much like the football team wasted Drake Maye.
We are already there? We just lost to Stanford lmao (for the 2nd straight year)
Avatar

lward343

Jan 15, 4:34 AM

It really is reminiscent of Drake/Sam. I almost feel bad that they chose to come here. It's embarrassing that we can't do better to surround them with help.
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:34 AM

TNTARHEEL said:
We are already there? We just lost to Stanford lmao (for the 2nd straight year)
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
Avatar

bmonk40

Jan 15, 4:39 AM

Dramatic
Avatar

UNC_Born_N_Bread

Jan 15, 4:39 AM

Agree with you OP. Agree.
Avatar

TNTARHEEL

Jan 15, 4:40 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
Stanfords roster is not anywhere close to what ours is financially…. You can’t lose to them. And yes they are trash.
Avatar

blue2013

Jan 15, 4:41 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
they were terrible last year and we lost at home
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:41 AM

TNTARHEEL said:
Stanfords roster is not anywhere close to what ours is financially…. You can’t lose to them. And yes they are trash.
Na they aren’t. And we clearly overpaid for our roster.
Avatar

dubtowntarheel

Jan 15, 4:41 AM

No, part of what makes him the player he is is that he would never consider that.
Avatar

Albert_Onestone

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

TNTARHEEL said:
No reason to keep playing for Hubert. Wouldn’t blame him one bit
Not everyone thinks like a loser
Avatar

Jamison33

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
15 days ago, Stanford scored 40 points on their home floor in a 47-40 loss to ND (with their 2nd leading scorer playing as well). Get the hell out of here with that nonsense.
Avatar

bluebooksandbluecups

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

Probably worth mentioning that Caleb is making a lot of money during his six months in Chapel Hill. I don’t think he will walk away from that.
Avatar

almostda

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

He should do so if for no other reason than the coaching sucks
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

blue2013 said:
they were terrible last year and we lost at home
They aren’t terrible this year. We can acknowledge this was a bad loss without making it seem like we just lost to Arkansas Pine Bluff.
Avatar

TennesseeTarHeel1999

Jan 15, 4:42 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
How many times does Hubert get to lose to average teams as the head coach of a top 3 basketball program of all time before it’s too many? Personally I’d say that’s already surpassed its limit.
Avatar

dubtowntarheel

Jan 15, 4:44 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
71 in Kenpom. That's the type of team we should handle on the road after a competitive 30 minutes. Not whatever we saw tonight.
Avatar

BuckHeels2356

Jan 15, 4:44 AM

TNTARHEEL said:
Stanfords roster is not anywhere close to what ours is financially…. You can’t lose to them. And yes they are trash.
They have a bunch of goofballs, a D2 player and a freshman stud. We should win by 20
Avatar

BooneHeel23

Jan 15, 4:44 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
You’re acting like Stanford is trash. This was a bad loss because UNC had this game and choked it away, but Stanford isn’t a bad team.
Stop. They are the 71st ranked team on Kenpom and have the 106th ranked offense. They were also missing one of their best players this was a bad loss to a bad team
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:45 AM

Jamison33 said:
15 days ago, Stanford scored 40 points on their home floor in a 47-40 loss to ND (with their 2nd leading scorer playing as well). Get the hell out of here with that nonsense.
They beat Louisville. You get out of here and go back to the football board and continue to be a drag over there gump.
Avatar

AndyHeel

Jan 15, 4:46 AM

He is the only reason I got tickets and go to the games. Would not blame him but hope he continues.
Avatar

TheHeelsDJ

Jan 15, 4:46 AM

BooneHeel23 said:
Stop. They are the 71st ranked team on Kenpom and have the 106th ranked offense. They were also missing one of their best players this was a bad loss to a bad team
I don’t care anything about Kenpom. Yall can continue to glaze that.
Avatar

Jamison33

Jan 15, 4:47 AM

TheHeelsDJ said:
They beat Louisville. You get out of here and go back to the football board and be a drag over there gump.
70s in KenPom…offense in the +100s. Stop making excuses for Hubert Davis. This is garbage basketball and it needs to end.
Avatar

1stGenerationHeel

Jan 15, 4:48 AM

Jamison33 said:
15 days ago, Stanford scored 40 points on their home floor in a 47-40 loss to ND (with their 2nd leading scorer playing as well). Get the hell out of here with that nonsense.
So what is your explanation for the difference in the two games? Is Shrewsberry a defensive savant as a coach or did Stanford have an off shooting night?

Thanks for checking out this free message board preview.

Join the full discussion at UNC Basketball Premium